This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

AKEEGA® (niraparib and abiraterone acetate)

Medical Information

AKEEGA - QUEST Study

Last Updated: 08/22/2024

SUMMARY

  • QUEST (NCT03431350) is an ongoing, phase 1b-2, multicenter, open-label study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of niraparib in combination with other anti-cancer therapies, including either cetrelimab, an investigational, intravenous, monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1), or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP), for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations who progressed on prior androgen-receptor targeted (ART) therapy for prostate cancer. For niraparib/AAP, the primary endpoints were incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and composite response rate (CRR). Secondary endpoints included circulating tumor cell (CTC) response rate, objective response rate (ORR), and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS).1-3
  • A summary of TEAEs in the niraparib/AAP group is described below. In patients receiving niraparib/AAP, the most common TEAEs leading to dose interruption/reduction in 58.3% (n=14) of patients were anemia (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=5), and neutropenia (n=3).4 Serious treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 3 patients and included lower gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage (n=1), asthenia and noncardiac chest pain (n=1), and anemia (n=1).3
  • Efficacy results for niraparib/AAP are summarized in Table: Primary and Secondary Efficacy Endpoints. In the niraparib/AAP intention-to-treat (ITT) population (n=23), CRR was 56.5% (90% CI, 37.5-74.2) after a median follow up of 18 months. ORR was 50.0% (90% CI, 9.0-40.4), and the median duration of response (DOR) was 4.7 months (range, 3.7-8.2).3
  • Results from other niraparib combination therapies in the QUEST study have not been published.

CLINICAL DATA

QUEST Study

Chi et al (2023)3 reported the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of niraparib/AAP (combination 2) in patients with mCRPC and HRR gene alterations who had progressed on 1 prior line of ART therapy.

Study Design/Methods

  • Ongoing, phase 1b-2, multicenter, open-label study.1,3
  • In this study, designed as a master protocol, patients were assigned to receive one of three combination therapies, with oral niraparib as a backbone therapy:
    • Combination 1: niraparib 200 mg orally (PO) once daily + cetrelimab 480 mg intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks.1,2
    • Combination 2: niraparib 200 mg (2 x 100 mg) PO once daily + abiraterone acetate 1000 mg (4 x 250 mg) PO once daily + prednisone 5 mg PO twice daily.1-3
    • Combination 3: niraparib with abiraterone acetate for pharmacokinetics assessment.1
  • Part 1 of the study established the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for combination 1 and determined the incidence of specified toxicities.1,2
  • Part 2 of the study evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of combination 1 and combination 2.
    • Combination 1 patients were assigned to cohort 1A or cohort 1B if they were DNA repair gene defect (DRD) positive or DRD negative, respectively.2
    • Combination 2 patients were divided into 3 cohorts depending on if they had biallelic BRCA1/2 HRR alterations, monoallelic BRCA1/2 HRR alterations, or monoallelic other HRR alterations.
  • The study will also determine the relative bioavailability of combination 3.1
  • The study design for combination 2 is presented in Figure: QUEST Study Design (Combination 2).

QUEST Study Design (Combination 2)3

Abbreviations: AA, abiraterone acetate; AAP, abiraterone acetate with prednisone; AE, adverse event; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; AR, androgen receptor; CRR, composite response rate; CTC, circulating tumor cell; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HRR, homologous recombination repair; ITT, intent-to-treat; mCRPC, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; NIRA, niraparib; NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; ORR, objective response rate; PO, orally; PSA, prostatespecific antigen; PSA50, prostate-specific antigen decline ≥50%; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; rPFS, radiographic progression-free survival.
aIncluding AAP and enzalutamide.
bExcept NMIBC, skin cancer (non-melanoma or melanoma), breast cancer, and malignancy that is considered cured with minimal risk of recurrence.
cOf the 24 patients included in the safety analysis, 1 was excluded from the ITT population.
dEvaluated in the ITT efficacy population. Defined as the proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 of the following responses: objective response, CTC response (defined as patients with CTC0 response at 8 weeks or with CTC conversion), or PSA50.
eEvaluated in the safety population.
fPer RECIST 1.1.

Results

Patient Characteristics
  • A total of 24 patients with mCRPC were enrolled to receive combination 2 of niraparib/AAP. Select patient baseline characteristics are described in Table: Select Baseline Characteristics: Combination 2 Safety Population.
  • Of the 24 enrolled patients, 8 patients had biallelic BRCA1/2 alterations, 9 patients had monoallelic BRCA1/2 alterations, and 6 patients had monoallelic other alterations.4
    • Initially, 1 HRR negative patient was assigned to the monoallelic BRCA1/2 cohort in error. This patient was excluded from the ITT population but was included in the safety population.
  • In the safety population, 42% of patients had soft tissue or nodal metastasis and 29% of patients received prior docetaxel therapy.4

Select Baseline Characteristics: Combination 2 Safety Population3,5
NIRA/AAP
(n=24)

Median age, years (range)
73 (58-88)
Race, n (%)
   Black or African American
3 (12.5)
   White
21 (87.5)
Ethnicity, n (%)
   Hispanic or Latino
1 (4.2)
   Not Hispanic or Latino
23 (95.8)
HRR alterations, n
   BRCA1/2
17
   ATM
2
   CHEK2
2
   PALB2
1
   FANCA
1
Gleason score at initial diagnosis, n (%)
   <7
2 (8.3)
   7
5 (20.8)
   ≥8
15 (62.5)
   Unknown
2 (8.3)
Extent of disease, n (%)
   Bone
22 (91.7)
      Bone only
13 (54.2)
   Liver
1 (4.2)
   Lymph node
9 (37.5)
   Other
2 (8.3)
ECOG PS score, n (%)
   0
14 (58.3)
   1
10 (41.7)
Prior therapy, n
   Prior taxanes
7
   Prior AR-targeted therapies
24
   Any PC-related radiotherapy
24
   Any PC-related surgery
24
Abbreviations: AAP, abiraterone acetate with prednisone; AR, androgen receptor; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HRR, homologous recombination repair; NIRA, niraparib; PC, prostate cancer.
Safety
  • In the safety population (n=24), the most common TEAEs of any grade reported by ≥15% of patients were anemia, fatigue, constipation, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, neutropenia, back pain, dyspnea, dizziness, and weight decreased.3
    • The most common grade ≥3 AEs were anemia (41.7%), thrombocytopenia (20.8%), fatigue (16.7%), and neutropenia (12.5%).
  • TEAEs led to dose interruption in 11 patients and dose reduction in 9 patients. Anemia (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=5), and neutropenia (n=3) were the most cited reasons for dose interruptions/reductions.
  • Discontinuation of niraparib/AAP therapy due to a TEAE occurred in 2 patients (thrombocytopenia [n = 1]; thrombocytopenia and anemia [n = 1]).
  • A total of 3 patients in the combination 2 group experienced serious TRAEs, which consisted of lower GI hemorrhage (n=1), asthenia and noncardiac chest pain (n=1), and anemia (n=1).
    • No deaths due to AEs were observed.
Efficacy
  • The median treatment duration for patients receiving niraparib/AAP was 10.3 months (range, 0.7-22.0).
  • CRR was 56.5% (90% CI, 37.5-74.2) in the ITT population (n=13) at a median followup of 18 months.3 Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints are described in Table: Primary and Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Combination 2 ITT Population.
    • A total of 8 patients remained on treatment at the analysis cutoff.
  • Of 10 patients with measurable disease at baseline, 5 (50%) patients reached partial response. Best response of stable disease and progressive disease were experienced by 2 (20%) patients and 3 (30%) patients, respectively. No patient experienced a complete response.
  • ORR was 50.0% (90% CI, 9.0-40.4), and the median DOR was 4.7 months (range, 3.78.2).
  • The median rPFS was 11.0 months (9.7-not estimable). At 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, event-free survival rates were 85.1%, 74.1%, 74.1%, and 46.7%, respectively.4

Primary and Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Combination 2 ITT Population3
% (90% CI)
NIRA/AAP
(n=23)

CRRa
56.5 (37.5-74.2)
ORRb
50.0 (9.0-40.4)
Overall CTC responsec
26.1 (12.0-45.1)
   CTC0 response at 8 weeksd
17.4 (6.2-35.5)
   CTC conversione
21.7 (9.0-40.4)
PSA50 response
30.4 (15.2-49.6)
Median rPFS, months (90% CI)
11.0 (9.7-NE)
Abbreviations: AAP, abiraterone acetate with prednisone; CI, confidence interval; CRR, composite response rate; CTC, circulating tumor cell; ITT, intent-to-treat; NE, not estimable; NIRA, niraparib; ORR, objective response rate; PCWG3, Prostate Cancer Working Group 3; PSA50, prostate-specific antigen decline ≥50%; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; rPFS, radiographic progression-free survival.
aCRR is defined as proportion of patients with 1 of the following: ORR, CTC response, or PSA decline ≥50%.
bObjective response was assessed in patients with measurable disease at baseline according to RECIST v1.1 and PCWG3.
cOverall CTC response = CTC0 response at 8 weeks or CTC conversion.
dCTC0 response at 8 weeks = baseline CTC per 7.5 mL blood >0 and 8-week post-baseline CTC=0.
eCTC conversion = baseline CTC per 7.5 mL blood >5 and a post-baseline CTC <5 with a confirmation CTC <5 taken ≥4 weeks later.

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 09 August 2024.

References

1 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A study of niraparib combination therapies for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (QUEST). In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2024 August 09]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03431350 NLM Identifier: NCT03431350.  
2 Subudhi SK, Aparicio A, Zurita A, et al. A phase 1b-2 study of niraparib combination therapies for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (NCT03431350). Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting; May 31-June 1, 2019; Chicago, IL.  
3 Chi KN, Fleshner N, Chiuri V, et al. Niraparib with abiraterone acetate and prednisone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: phase II QUEST study results. Oncologist. 2023;28(5):e309-e312.  
4 Chi KN, Fleshner N, Chiuri VE, et al. Niraparib with abiraterone acetate and prednisone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from the phase 2 QUEST study. Poster presented at: American Urological Association (AUA) Annual Meeting; May 13-16, 2022; New Orleans, LA.  
5 Chi KN, Fleshner N, Chiuri VE, et al. Supplement for: Niraparib with abiraterone acetate and prednisone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: phase II QUEST study results. Oncologist. 2023;28(5):e309-e312.