SUMMARY
- Hyperphosphatemia is an expected and transient laboratory abnormality during BALVERSA therapy due to renal tubular fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibition.1
- Under normal physiological conditions, fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) binds to the FGFR in the renal proximal tubule, inhibiting renal phosphate reabsorption. FGFR inhibition with erdafitinib blocks the inhibition of reabsorption, resulting in increased reabsorption of phosphate from the proximal tubules which leads to elevated serum phosphate levels.2-4
- Refer to the product labeling for monitoring and dose modifications for elevated phosphate levels.
- THOR (BLC3001/NCT03390504) is an ongoing, phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of BALVERSA vs chemotherapy (docetaxel or vinflunine) or pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) and selected FGFR gene alterations that has progressed during or after 1 or 2 prior lines of therapy.5,6
- In an analysis of results from cohort 1 (n=266), the safety profiles were reported to be consistent with the known safety profiles of BALVERSA and chemotherapy. In the safety population, any grade and grade ≥3 hyperphosphatemia was reported in 108 (80%) and 7 (5.2%) patients in the BALVERSA arm. No hyperphosphatemia events were reported in the chemotherapy arm.
- BLC2001 (NCT02365597) is a phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of BALVERSA in 99 patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic UC and prespecified FGFR genetic alterations (FGFR3 mutation or FGFR2/3 fusion).7,8
- In the final analysis, the safety profile remained similar to that in the primary analysis, with no new safety signals reported with a longer follow-up. The most common TRAEs and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included hyperphosphatemia (any grade), which was reported in 74.3% and 78% of patients treated with BALVERSA, respectively. No incidences of grade 4 or 5 treatment-related or treatment-emergent hyperphosphatemia were reported.
- Hyperphosphatemia leading to soft tissue mineralization, cutaneous calcinosis, non-uremic calciphylaxis, and vascular calcification has been observed in patients who have received BALVERSA as described in published case reports.9-11
- Serum phosphate concentrations should be assessed between 14 and 21 days after initiating treatment with BALVERSA.1
- Uptitrate the dose to 9 mg daily as soon as possible if that serum phosphate concentration is <9.0 mg/dL, and there is no drug-related toxicity.
- If the phosphate level is 9.0 mg/dL or higher, follow the relevant dose modifications within the product labeling. Phosphate concentrations should be monitored monthly.
- Interventions investigators in the BLC2001 study and THOR study were instructed to perform to manage elevated phosphate concentrations are provided in Table: Management of Elevated Phosphate Levels in the BLC2001 Study and Table: Management of Elevated Phosphate Levels in the THOR Study.5,12
- Dietary phosphate may require restriction in patients receiving BALVERSA.12 In general, plant-based foods have lower phosphorous levels compared to processed foods and animal-based foods.13 Examples of high phosphorus foods include: dairy products, protein-rich foods, phosphorus food additives, and beverages such as dark colas, beer, and cocoa/chocolate drinks. Additional information on dietary phosphorus, including infographics and patient handouts, may be found at http://www.kidney.org/atoz/content/phosphorus.14,15
- Because many foods may contain significant amounts of phosphorus/phosphates, consulting a nutrition professional (eg, a registered dietician nutritionist [RDN]) for individualized dietary planning and education may be an important part of an interdisciplinary treatment plan.15
- For persistently elevated phosphate concentrations, adding a non-calcium containing phosphate binder (eg, sevelamer carbonate) may be considered.12
CLINICAL Data
To provide the most relevant information, the summary below is limited to information from the pivotal phase 3 (THOR/BLC3001; cohort 1) and phase 2 (BLC2001) studies in patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC and selected FGFR gene alterations.
THOR Study
THOR is an ongoing study evaluating the efficacy and safety of BALVERSA vs standard of care chemotherapy (docetaxel or vinflunine) or pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic or unresectable UC and selected FGFR gene alterations that has progressed during or after 1 or 2 prior lines of therapy.5,6
In cohort 1, 266 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive an uptitration regimen of BALVERSA 8 mg daily or chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 intravenous [IV] every 3 weeks [Q3W] or vinflunine 320 mg/m2 IV Q3W). Of all patients, 136 received BALVERSA 8 mg daily and 130 received chemotherapy (82 assigned to docetaxel and 48 assigned to vinflunine).5,6
Cohort 1 Analysis
In cohort 1, after a median of 15.9 months follow-up for efficacy and median duration of BALVERSA exposure of 4.8 months (range, 0.2-38.2). The safety profiles in both arms were consistent with the known safety profiles of BALVERSA and chemotherapy.5
- Among 135 patients receiving BALVERSA who were evaluated for safety, the most frequent grade 3-4 TRAEs included hyperphosphatemia, which was reported in 7 (5.2%) patients.
- The incidence of treatment-related hyperphosphatemia in the safety population is summarized in the Table: THOR Cohort 1 Safety Population: Incidence of Hyperphosphatemia.
THOR Cohort 1 Safety Population: Incidence of Hyperphosphatemia5
|
|
|
---|
|
|
|
|
---|
Hyperphosphatemia
| 108 (80)
| 7 (5.2)
| 0
| 0
|
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event. aAEs (of any cause) that emerged or worsened during treatment, according to preferred term and highest grade, and that were reported in >15% of the patients in either treatment group.
|
BLC2001 Study
BLC2001 is a multicenter, open-label phase 2 study evaluating the use of BALVERSA in 99 patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic UC who had prespecified FGFR genetic alterations (FGFR3 mutation or FGFR2/3 fusion) and who had progressed during or following ≥1 line of prior systemic chemotherapy or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy (n=87), or were chemotherapy-naïve due to cisplatin ineligibility (n=12). Patients had tumor tissues with 1 of the following FGFR3 gene mutations: R248C, S249C, G370C, Y373C OR 1 of the following FGFR gene fusions: FGFR3-TACC3, FGFR3-BAIAP2L1, FGFR2-BICC1, FGFR2-CASP7.12
Final Analysis
In the final analysis, after a median of 24 months of follow-up for efficacy (interquartile range [IQR], 22.7-26.6) and median treatment duration of 5.4 months (IQR, 2.8-9), 101 patients were treated with an uptitration regimen of BALVERSA 8 mg daily (2 patients enrolled after the clinical cutoff date for the primary analysis). Overall, 60 patients received BALVERSA 8 mg daily and 41 were uptitrated to BALVERSA 9 mg daily.7
- The safety profile of BALVERSA remained consistent with that in the primary analysis.7
- No grade 4 adverse events (AEs) were considered related to BALVERSA, and no new TRAEs were observed with the longer follow-up.7
- No incidences of grade 4 or 5 treatment-related or treatment-emergent hyperphosphatemia were reported.7,16
- The incidence of treatment-related hyperphosphatemia is summarized in the Table: BLC2001: Treatment-Related Hyperphosphatemia in the Final Analysis.
- Treatment-related hyperphosphatemia leading to treatment discontinuation was reported in 1 (1%) patient.16
BLC2001: Treatment-Related Hyperphosphatemia in the Final Analysis16
|
|
---|
|
|
|
|
---|
Hyperphosphatemia
| 75 (74.3)
| 50 (49.5)
| 23 (22.8)
| 2 (2.0)
|
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; UpT, potential for uptitration to 9 mg daily.
|
- Grade 1-2 and grade 3 treatment-emergent hyperphosphatemia was reported in 77 (76%) and 2 (2%) patients, respectively.7
- The incidence of treatment-emergent hyperphosphatemia is summarized in the Table: BLC2001: Treatment-Emergent Hyperphosphatemia.
- Incidence of treatment-emergent hyperphosphatemia was higher among patients who received BALVERSA 8 mg daily (n=52 [87%]) compared with patients who were uptitrated to BALVERSA 9 mg daily (n=27 [66%]).7
BLC2001: Treatment-Emergent Hyperphosphatemia8
|
|
---|
Developed hyperphosphatemia, n/N with ≥1 TEAE (%)
| 79/101 (78)
|
Median (range) time to onset of hyperphosphatemia, days
| 20 (8-449)
|
Dose modification for hyperphosphatemia, n/N with hyperphosphatemia (%)
|
| Dose reduction
| 11/79 (14)
|
| Dose interruption
| 24/79 (30)
|
| Discontinuation
| 1/79 (1)
|
Median (range) time treatment withheld for hyperphosphatemia, days
| 13 (4-43)
|
Received treatment for hyperphosphatemia, na/N with hyperphosphatemia (%)
| 31/79 (39)
|
Resolution of ≥1 hyperphosphatemia event by data cutoff, nb/N with hyperphosphatemia (%)
| 74/79 (94)
|
Median (range) time to resolution of hyperphosphatemia, days
| 17 (4-141)
|
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.aAmong the 31 patients receiving concomitant medications, the most common therapy was phosphate binders (94%). The median (range) phosphate value prompting the use of phosphate binders was 6.04 mg/dL (1.8-8.6).bAmong patients with hyperphosphatemia, ≥1 event resolved in 11 of 11 patients with dose reduction, in 24 of 24 patients with dose interruption, and in 1 of 1 with treatment discontinuation.
|
management of elevated phosphate levels in the THOR study
Table: Management of Elevated Phosphate Levels in the THOR Study summarizes interventions that investigators in the THOR study were instructed to perform for the management of elevated phosphate levels.5 These interventions from the THOR study may not reflect current practice. Interventions should be based on patient presentation and the clinical judgment of the treating physician. Refer to the product labeling for monitoring and dose modifications for elevated phosphate levels.
Management of Elevated Phosphate Levels in the THOR Study5
|
|
|
---|
<5.5 mg/dL
| | |
5.6-6.9 mg/dL
| | |
7.0-9.0 mg/dL
| | |
>9.0-10.0 mg/dL
| | |
>10.0 mg/dL
| | |
Significant alteration in baseline renal function and/or grade 3 hypocalcemia
| | |
aPersistent hyperphosphatemia is considered to be more than 1 sequential phosphate value above the cutoff. bStudy drug interruptions for hyperphosphatemia are suggested to be of 7 days duration.
|
management of elevated phosphate levels in the blc2001 study
Table: Management of Elevated Phosphate Levels in the BLC2001 Study summarizes interventions investigators in the BLC2001 study were instructed to perform for the management of elevated phosphate levels.12 These interventions from the BLC2001 study may not reflect current practice. Interventions should be based on patient presentation and the clinical judgment of the treating physician. Refer to the product labeling for monitoring and dose modifications for elevated phosphate levels.
Management of Elevated Phosphate Levels in the BLC2001 Study12
|
|
|
---|
5.6-6.9 mg/dL
| | |
7.0-9.0 mg/dL
| | |
>9.0 mg/dL
| | |
>10.0 mg/dL and/or significant alteration in baseline renal function and/or grade 3 hypocalcemia
| | |
aStudy drug interruptions for hyperphosphatemia are suggested to be of 7 days duration. bPersistent hyperphosphatemia is considered to be more than 1 sequential phosphate value above the cutoff.
|
Management of Hyperphosphatemia During BLC2001 Study
- In the interim analysis of the BLC2001 study, hyperphosphatemia was managed by dose interruption (n=23), dose reduction (n=9), and treatment with phosphate binders which included sevelamer (n=26), sevelamer carbonate (n=5), and lanthanum carbonate, calcium carbonate, and calcium acetate (n=1 each). One patient discontinued BALVERSA due to hyperphosphatemia.17
- Phosphate binders were used prophylactically for 5 patients and for 29 patients following phosphate assessment during the study.17
- Median total duration of phosphate binder treatment was 81 days.17
- Use of the following drugs that increase serum phosphate levels were prohibited unless there were no alternatives: potassium phosphate supplements, vitamin D supplements, antacids, phosphate-containing enemas or laxatives.12
Literature Search
A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 23 August 2024.
1 | Data on File. Erdafitinib. Company Core Data Sheet. Janssen Research & Development, LLC; 2024. |
2 | Wohrle S, Henninger C, Bonny O, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor signaling ameliorates FGF23-mediated hyphophosphatemic rickets. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:899-911. |
3 | Gattineni J, Alphonse P, Zhang Q, et al. Regulation of renal phosphate transport by FGF23 is mediated by FGFR1 and FGFR4. Am J Physiol-renal. 2014;306(3):F351-F358. |
4 | Hierro C, Rondon J, Tabenero J. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor/FGF inhibitors: novel targets and strategies for optimization of response of solid tumors. Semin Oncol. 2015;42:801-819. |
5 | Loriot Y, Matsubara N, Park SH, et al. Erdafitinib or chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:1961-1971. |
6 | Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A phase 3 study of erdafitinib compared with vinflunine or docetaxel or pembrolizumab in subjects with advanced urothelial cancer and selected FGFR gene aberrations. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2024 May 28]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03390504. NLM Identifier: NCT03390504. |
7 | Siefker-Radtke AO, Necchi A, Park SH, et al. Efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: long-term follow-up of a phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(2):248-258. |
8 | Siefker-Radtke AO, Necchi A, Park SH, et al. Management of fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor treatment-emergent adverse events of interest in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium; February 11-13, 2021; Virtual. |
9 | Hirner J, Cleary JM, Sheets A, et al. Fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors and nonuremic calciphylaxis. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(1):119-121. |
10 | Macklis P, Chung C, Kaffenberger B. Calciphylaxis associated with the fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor erdafitinib. JAAD Case Rep. 2020;7:125-127. |
11 | Arudra K, Patel R, Tetzlaff MT, et al. Calcinosis cutis dermatologic toxicity associated with fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor for the treatment of Wilms tumor. J Cutan Pathol. 2018;45(10):786-790. |
12 | Loriot Y, Necchi A, Park SH, et al. Erdafitinib in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(4):338-348. |
13 | Joshi S, Potluri V, Shah S. Dietary Management of Hyperphosphatemia. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;72(1):155-156. |
14 | National Kidney Foundation. Phosphorus and Your Diet. Accessed 2024-01-10. Available via: https://www.kidney.org/atoz/content/phosphorus |
15 | Brauer A, Waheed S, Singh T, et al. Improvement in hyperphosphatemia using phosphate education and planning talks. J Renal Nutr. 2019;29(2):156-162. |
16 | Siefker-Radtke AO, Necchi A, Park SH, et al. Supplement for: Efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: long-term follow-up of a phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(2):248-258. |
17 | Data on File. Erdafitinib Clinical Study Report Protocol 42756493BLC2001. Janssen Research & Development, LLC; 2018. |