This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

Use of BALVERSA in Geriatric Patients

Last Updated: 10/17/2024

SUMMARY  

  • BLC2001 (NCT02365597) was a phase 2, multicenter, open-label study in evaluating the use of BALVERSA in adult patients (age ≥18 years; N=99) with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) and prespecified fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) genetic alterations (FGFR3 mutation or FGFR2/3 fusion) who received prior chemotherapy or were chemotherapy-naïve due to cisplatin ineligibility.1-4The median age was 68 years (range, 36-87 years) for the overall study population, with 16 patients aged ≥75 years and 83 patients aged <75 years.1,2
    • Park et al (2019)1 conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients with high-risk disease from the BLC2001 study. The investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) was 50.0% (8/16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.7-75.3) in those aged ≥75 years. No differences in the proportion of grade 3/4 serious adverse events (AEs) were identified between age-based subgroups (eg, age ≥75 years and age <75 years).

CLINICAL DATA

Park et al (2019)1 conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients with high-risk disease, including patients aged ≥75 years, in the BLC2001 study.

Study Design/Methods

  • Phase 2, multicenter, open-label study evaluating the use of BALVERSA in adult patients (N=99) with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic UC who had prespecified FGFR genetic alterations (FGFR3 mutation or FGFR2/3 fusion).1,2
  • Patients who had progressed during or following ≥1 line of prior systemic chemotherapy or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy (n=87) or were chemotherapy-naïve due to cisplatin ineligibility (n=12) were included.1,2
  • Patients had tumor tissues with one of the following FGFR3 gene mutations (R248C, S249C, G370C, Y373C) or FGFR gene fusions (FGFR3-TACC3, FGFR3-BAIAP2L1, FGFR2-BICC1, FGFR2-CASP7).5
  • Efficacy and safety analyses were reported for patients who received an initial BALVERSA dose of 8 mg once daily, with up-titration to 9 mg once daily if the serum phosphate levels on day 14 were below the target of 5.5 mg/dL and there were no treatment-related AEs.1

Results

Patient Characteristics
  • The median age was 68 years (range, 36-87 years) for the overall study population, with 16 patients aged ≥75 years and 83 patients aged <75 years.1,2
Efficacy
  • Investigator-assessed ORR was 40.4% (95% CI, 30.7-50.7) in the primary analysis of all patients.
    • The ORR was 50.0% (8/16; 95% CI, 24.7-75.3) in patients aged ≥75 years and 38.6% (32/83; 95% CI, 28.1-49.9) in patients aged <75 years.
  • The median duration of response (DOR) was 5.59 months (95% CI, 4.24-7.23) in the primary analysis of all patients.
    • The median DOR was 13.37 months (8/16; 95% CI, 2.56-13.37) in patients aged ≥75 years and 5.59 months (32/83; 95% CI, 4.21-7.00) in patients aged <75 years.
  • The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.52 months (95% CI, 4.17-5.95) in the primary analysis of all patients.
    • The median PFS was 5.65 months (95% CI, 1.38-14.75) in patients aged ≥75 years and 5.52 months (95% CI, 4.04-6.64) in patients aged <75 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; P=0.28).
  • The median overall survival (OS) was 13.80 months (95% CI, 8.82-not evaluable [NE]) in the primary analysis of all patients.
    • The median OS was 14.03 months (95% CI, 3.98-NE) in patients aged ≥75 years and 12.02 months (95% CI, 8.97-NE) in patients aged <75 years (HR, 0.76; P=0.54).
Safety

Safety Analysis for the Primary Analysis Population and Age Subgroups1
Grade 3/4 Serious TEAEs
Dose Reduction
Dose Interruption
Treatment Discontinuation
Death
Primary analysis of all patients (N=99), n (%)
33 (33.3)
55 (55.6)
70 (70.7)
21 (21.2)
7 (7.1)
Age
   ≥75 years
   (n=16), n (%)

6 (37.5)
11 (68.8)
13 (81.3)
3 (18.8)
2 (12.5)
   <75 years
   (n=83), n (%)

27 (32.5)
44 (53.0)
57 (68.7)
18 (21.7)
5 (6.0)
Abbreviations: TEAEs, treatment-emergent adverse events.

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT Drug Files (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 07 October 2024.

References

1 Park SH, Loriot Y, Zhong B, et al. Erdafitinib in high-risk patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO); May 31-June 4, 2019; Chicago, IL.  
2 Loriot Y, Necchi A, Park SH, et al. Erdafitinib in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(4):338-348.  
3 Siefker-Radtke AO, Necchi A, Park SH, et al. Efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: long-term follow-up of a phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(2):248-258.  
4 Siefker-Radtke AO, Necchi A, Park SH, et al. Supplement to: Efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: long-term follow-up of a phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(2):248-258.  
5 Loriot Y, Necchi A, Park SH, et al. Protocol for: Erdafitinib in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(4):338-348.