This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

ERLEADA - Hematologic Events

Last Updated: 06/04/2024

SUMMARY

  • In SPARTAN, the phase 3 study in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC; N=1207), at the final analysis of overall survival (OS), which occurred after a median follow-up of 52.0 months,1 anemia was the only hematologic treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) that occurred in ≥5% in any treatment group: 10.1%, 4.3%, and 3.9% of patients in the ERLEADA, placebo, and crossover groups, respectively.2 Additional hematologic TEAEs reported from the primary analysis are summarized below.
  • In TITAN, the phase 3 study in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC; N=1052), at the final analysis of OS, which occurred after a median follow-up of 44.0 months,3 anemia and leukopenia were the only hematologic TEAEs that occurred in ≥5% in any treatment group: 13.2% and 5.5%, 13.7% and 4.0%, and 6.3% and 3.8% of patients in the ERLEADA, placebo, and crossover groups, respectively.4 Additional hematologic TEAEs reported from the primary and final analyses are summarized below. Safety results from the primary analysis were previously reported.5

CLINICAL DATA

Phase 3 SPARTAN Study in Patients With nmCRPC

The phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled SPARTAN study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ERLEADA in patients with nmCRPC (N=1207). Patients were required to have a prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) of ≤10 months and confirmation of non-metastatic disease by blinded independent central review. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either ERLEADA 240 mg orally (PO) once daily (n=806) or placebo PO once daily (n=401).6 All patients received a concomitant gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog or had a bilateral orchiectomy. Patient baseline demographic and disease characteristics were well balanced, and there were no significant differences between groups. No patients in either group had baseline hematology laboratory values with ≥grade 3 severity.7 Patients were excluded if they had hemoglobin (Hb) <9.0 g/dL, platelets <100,000/µL, or absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1500/µL.8 In the SPARTAN primary analysis, the median treatment duration was 16.9 months in the ERLEADA group and 11.2 months in the placebo group.6,7 After study unblinding, patients in the placebo group were eligible for crossover into the ERLEADA group (n=76).1

In the primary analysis, the number of patients in the safety population with hematologic TEAEs reported in the SPARTAN study, by toxicity grade, are shown in Table: Hematologic TEAEs by Toxicity Grade in the SPARTAN Study (Primary Analysis).


Hematologic TEAEs by Toxicity Grade in the SPARTAN Study (Primary Analysis)7a,b
n (%)
Total
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Anemia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
52 (6.5%)
16 (4.0%)
21 (2.6%)
6 (1.5%)
25 (3.1%)
6 (1.5%)
6 (0.7%)
4 (1.0%)
0
0
Leukopenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
7 (0.9%)
1 (0.3%)
5 (0.6%)
1 (0.3%)
1 (0.1%)
0
1 (0.1%)
0
0
0
Neutropenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
12 (1.5%)
4 (1.0%)
5 (0.6%)
2 (0.5%)
2 (0.2%)
2 (0.5%)
4 (0.5%)
0
1 (0.1%)
0
Thrombocytopenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
8 (1.0%)
3 (0.8%)
5 (0.6%)
2 (0.5%)
0
1 (0.3%)
1 (0.1%)
0
2 (0.2%)
0
Leukocytosis
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
5 (0.6%)
1 (0.3%)
4 (0.5%)
1 (0.3%)
0
0
1 (0.1%)
0
0
0
Neutrophilia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
3 (0.4%)
0
2 (0.2%)
0
1 (0.1%)
0
0
0
0
0
Coagulopathy
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
0
1 (0.3%)
0
0
0
0
0
1 (0.3%)
0
0
Lymphopenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
10 (1.2%)
2 (0.5%)
4 (0.5%)
0
5 (0.6%)
2 (0.5%)
0
0
1 (0.1%)
0
Lymphadenopathy
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
3 (0.4%)
2 (0.5%)
2 (0.2%)
1 (0.3%)
1 (0.1%)
1 (0.3%)
0
0
0
0
Eosinophilia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
3 (0.4%)
3 (0.8%)
3 (0.4%)
2 (0.5%)
0
1 (0.3%)
0
0
0
0
Pancytopenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
1 (0.1%)
0
0
0
0
0
1 (0.1%)
0
0
0
Abbreviations: NCI, National Cancer Institute; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.aPercent is based on the safety population within the ERLEADA (n=803) and placebo (n=398) groups. bToxicity grade is based on NCI common toxicity criteria, Version 4.0.

At the final analysis for OS, after a median follow-up of 52.0 months, anemia was the only hematologic TEAE that occurred in ≥5% in any treatment group, which occurred in 10.1%, 4.3%, and 3.9% of patients in the ERLEADA, placebo, and crossover groups, respectively.2

Additional Information

Additional information regarding the SPARTAN study, including the clinical study report, protocol, and statistical analysis plan, can be found at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2018/Erleada_210951_toc.cfm (Scroll to the “Sponsor Clinical Study Reports ARN-509-003 SPARTAN NCT # 01946204” section at the bottom of the web page).

Phase 3 TITAN Study in Patients With mCSPC

The phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled TITAN study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ERLEADA in patients with mCSPC (N=1052). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either ERLEADA 240 mg PO once daily (n=525) or placebo PO once daily (n=527).5 All patients received a concomitant GnRH analog or had prior bilateral orchiectomy.9 Patient baseline demographic and disease characteristics were well balanced, and there were no substantial differences between groups.5 Patients were excluded if they had Hb <9.0 g/dL, neutrophils <1.5 x 109/L, or platelets <100 x 109/L.9 In the TITAN primary analysis, the median treatment duration was 20.5 months in the ERLEADA group and 18.3 months in the placebo group.5 After study unblinding, patients in the placebo group were eligible for crossover into the ERLEADA group (n=208). At the final analysis for OS, after a median follow-up of 44.0 months, the median treatment duration was 39.3 months in the ERLEADA group, 20.2 months in the placebo group, and 15.4 months in the ERLEADA crossover group.3

The number of patients in the safety population with hematologic TEAEs reported at the TITAN primary analysis and at the final analysis for OS, by toxicity grade, are shown in Table: Hematologic TEAEs by Toxicity Grade in the TITAN Study.


Hematologic TEAEs by Toxicity Grade in the TITAN Study4,10a
n (%)
Total
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Primary Analysisb
Anemia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
48 (9.2%)
71 (13.5%)
24 (4.6%)
26 (4.9%)
15 (2.9%)
28 (5.3%)
9 (1.7%)
17 (3.2%)
0
0
Leukopenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
26 (5.0%)
19 (3.6%)
14 (2.7%)
10 (1.9%)
12 (2.3%)
6 (1.1%)
0
3 (0.6%)
0
0
Neutropenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
14 (2.7%)
14 (2.7%)
7 (1.3%)
6 (1.1%)
3 (0.6%)
7 (1.3%)
2 (0.4%)
0
2 (0.4%)
1 (0.2%)
Thrombocytopenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
11 (2.1%)
15 (2.8%)
10 (1.9%)
10 (1.9%)
1 (0.2%)
3 (0.6%)
0
0
0
2 (0.4%)
Leukocytosis
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
2 (0.4%)
1 (0.2%)
2 (0.4%)
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Neutrophilia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
1 (0.2%)
1 (0.2%)
0
1 (0.2%)
0
0
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
Thrombocytosis
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
1 (0.2%)
1 (0.2%)
1 (0.2%)
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Coagulopathy
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
1 (0.2%)
0
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Febrile neutropenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
0
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
Lymphopenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
0
Lymphadenopathy
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
0
1 (0.2%)
0
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Final Analysisc,d
Anemia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
   Crossover group
69 (13.2%)
72 (13.7%)
13 (6.3%)
33 (6.3%)
26 (4.9%)
8 (3.8%)
24 (4.6%)
27 (5.1%)
3 (1.4%)
11 (2.1%)
19 (3.6%)
2 (1.0%)
1 (0.2%)
0
0
Leukopenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
   Crossover group
29 (5.5%)
21 (4.0%)
8 (3.8%)
16 (3.1%)
11 (2.1%)
4 (1.9%)
13 (2.5%)
7 (1.3%)
4 (1.9%)
0
3 (0.6%)
0
0
0
0
Neutropenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
   Crossover group
16 (3.1%)
15 (2.8%)
2 (1.0%)
7 (1.3%)
6 (1.1%)
1 (0.5%)
5 (1.0%)
8 (1.5%)
1 (0.5%)
2 (0.4%)
0
0
2 (0.4%)
1 (0.2%)
0
Thrombocytopenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
   Crossover group
12 (2.3%)
15 (2.8%)
6 (2.9%)
11 (2.1%)
10 (1.9%)
5 (2.4%)
1 (0.2%)
3 (0.6%)
1 (0.5%)
0
0
0
0
2 (0.4%)
0
Leukocytosis
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
   Crossover group
3 (0.6%)
1 (0.2%)
0
3 (0.6%)
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Neutrophilia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
   Crossover group
1 (0.2%)
1 (0.2%)
0
0
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
0
Thrombocytosis
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
   Crossover group
1 (0.2%)
1 (0.2%)
0
1 (0.2%)
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Coagulopathy
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
   Crossover group
2 (0.4%)
0
0
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
0
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
0
Febrile neutropenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
   Crossover group
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
0
Lymphopenia
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
   Crossover group
2 (0.4%)
0
2 (1.0%)
1 (0.2%)
0
1 (0.5%)
1 (0.2%)
0
1 (0.5%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Lymphadenopathy
   ERLEADA group
   Placebo group
   Crossover group
0
1 (0.2%)
0
0
1 (0.2%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Abbreviations: NCI, National Cancer Institute; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.aToxicity grade is based on NCI common toxicity criteria, Version 4.03.bPercent is based on the safety population within the ERLEADA (n=524) and placebo (n=527) groups.cPercent is based on the safety population within the ERLEADA (n=524), placebo (n=527), and crossover (n=208) groups.dAfter study unblinding, patients in the placebo group were eligible for crossover into the ERLEADA group.

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 24 May 2024. Summarized in this response are relevant data limited to the phase 3 SPARTAN and TITAN studies in patients with nmCRPC and mCSPC, respectively.

 

References

1 Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S, et al. Apalutamide and overall survival in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2021;79(1):150-158.  
2 Data on File. Apalutamide. SPARTAN Clinical Study Report. Janssen Research & Development, LLC. EDMS-ERI-205435292; 2020.  
3 Chi KN, Chowdhury S, Bjartell A, et al. Apalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: final survival analysis of the randomized, double-blind, phase III TITAN study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(20):2294-2303.  
4 Data on File. Apalutamide. TITAN Clinical Study Report. Janssen Research & Development, LLC. EDMS-RIM-127733; 2021.  
5 Chi KN, Agarwal N, Bjartell A, et al. Apalutamide for metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(1):13-24.  
6 Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S, et al. Apalutamide treatment and metastasis-free survival in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(15):1408-1418.  
7 J&J PRD. Clinical Study Report: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of ARN-509 in men with non-metastatic (M0) castration-resistant prostate cancer selective prostate AR targeting with ARN-509 (SPARTAN) Protocol ARN-509-003; Phase 3 JNJ-56021927 (apalutamide); 2017. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2018/rev_210951_arn-509-003_CSR_Redacted.pdf. Updated March 29, 2018. Accessed April 30, 2024.  
8 Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S, et al. Protocol for: Apalutamide treatment and metastasis-free survival in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(15):1408-1418.  
9 Chi KN, Agarwal N, Bjartell A, et al. Protocol for: Apalutamide for metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(1):13-24.  
10 Data on File. Apalutamide. TITAN Clinical Study Report. Janssen Research & Development, LLC. EDMS-ERI-174221283; 2019.