This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

Adverse Event - Increased Urination and Select Urine Chemistry

Last Updated: 05/31/2023

SUMMARY

  • INVOKANAresults in osmotic diuresis which may lead to reductions in intravascular volume.1
  • In a pooled analysis of four2-5 26-week, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 3, adverse reaction of increased urination (which includes polyuria, pollakiuria, urine output increased, micturition urgency, and nocturia) occurred more commonly with INVOKANA than PBO (100 mg [5.3%], 300 mg [4.6%], and PBO [0.8%]).1,6
  • Urine Output: In phase 3 and 4 INVOKANAstudies, timed 24-hour urine collections were not routinely performed.3-5, 7-13 Timed 24-hour urine collections were detailed in three phase 1 studies.14-16.
  • Day and Night Time Urination: A phase 1 study evaluated the safety and tolerability of canagliflozin (liquid suspension formulation) 30 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg and 400 mg once daily, and 300 mg twice daily vs PBO. There were no apparent differences in day or evening urination symptoms between INVOKANA groups and the PBO group based on patient-reported questionnaires.14,17
  • Other Urine Parameters: In a pooled analysis of four2-5 26-week, PBO-controlled phase 3 studies there were no notable changes in urine specific gravity with INVOKANAand PBO.18
    • In the same analysis, there was a slight non-dose-dependent mean percent reduction (-0.14%) in urine pH with the combined INVOKANAgroup (100 mg and 300 mg), and a slight increase (0.06%) in the PBO group.18
    • In a phase 1 study, urine osmolality increased in the combined INVOKANAgroup relative to PBO with greater increase observed with INVOKANA300 mg twice daily.16
  • Polyuria/pollakiuria: In a post-marketing surveillance study, pollakiuria, nocturia, polyuria, increased urine output, and micturition disorder was reported in 96 (0.79%), 21 (0.17%), 12 (0.10%), 2 (0.02%), and 1 (0.01%) patients, respectively.19

BACKGROUND

Fluid Intake

In INVOKANA phase 3 and 4 studies, there were no specific instructions or restrictions given to patients regarding fluid intake. In some phase 1 studies that measured timed 24-hour urine collections, water was allowed ad libitum.14, 16, 17

CLINICAL DATA

Urine Output

Phase 3 Studies

  • In a pooled analysis of four2-5 26-week, PBO-controlled phase 3 studies (including one INVOKANAmonotherapy study2 and 3 studies with INVOKANAas add-on to metforminbased therapy3-5), the adverse reaction of increased urination (which includes polyuria, pollakiuria, urine output increased, micturition urgency, and nocturia) occurred more commonly with INVOKANA than PBO, and occurred in at least 2% of patients treated with INVOKANA (100 mg [5.3%], 300 mg [4.6%], and PBO [0.8%]).1,6
  • Timed 24-hour urine collections were not routinely performed in INVOKANA phase 3 studies.2-5, 7-11

Osmotic Diuresis-Related Adverse Events

  • In a pooled analysis of four2-5 26-week, PBO-controlled phase 3 studies (including one INVOKANAmonotherapy study2 and 3 studies with INVOKANAas add-on to metforminbased therapy3-5), incidences of adverse events (AEs) related to osmotic diuresis were increased with INVOKANA 100 and 300 mg relative to PBO. Three patients in the INVOKANA group (two patients in 300 mg group and one patient in 100 mg group) discontinued due to osmotic diuresis-related pollakiuria.6, 20 See Table: Osmotic Diuresis-Related AEs in a Pool of Four 26-Week PBO-Controlled Studies

Osmotic Diuresis-Related AEs in a Pool of Four 26-Week PBO-Controlled Studies6,20
 
PBO (n=646),
n (%)

INVOKANA 100 mg (n=833),
n (%)

INVOKANA 300 mg (n=834),
n (%)

Any osmotic diuresis AE
5 (0.8)
56 (6.7)
47 (5.6)
Osmotic diuresis leading to discontinuation
0
1 (0.1)
2 (0.2)
AEs related to study druga
5 (0.8)
41 (4.9)
41 (4.9)
Serious AE
0
0
0
Micturition urgency
0
2 (0.2)
3 (0.4)
Nocturia
1 (0.2)
3 (0.4)
1 (0.1)
Pollakiuria
4 (0.6)
35 (4.2)
26 (3.1)
Polyuria
0
6 (0.7)
12 (1.4)
Urine output increased
0
1 (0.1)
1 (0.1)
Dry mouth
0
6 (0.7)
2 (0.2)
Polydipsia
0
6 (0.7)
2 (0.2)
Thirst
1 (0.2)
11 (1.3)
16 (1.9)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; PBO, placebo.
aPossibly, probably, or very likely related to study drug.

  • In a pooled analysis of six phase 3, double-blind, PBO-controlled studies2-5, 7, 21, 22 evaluating efficacy and safety of INVOKANA in subgroups of patients <75 and ≥75 years of age, the incidence of osmotic diuresis-related AEs (including dry mouth, dry throat, micturition disorder, micturition urgency, nocturia, pollakiuria, polydipsia, polyuria, thirst, and high urine output) with INVOKANA 100 and 300 mg and non-INVOKANA was 6.9%, 6.9%, and 1.8%, respectively, in patients aged <75, and 4.3%, 9.9%, and 4.5%, respectively, in those aged >75.23
    • Osmotic diuresis-related AEs that led to discontinuation occurred in 16 patients younger than 75 years (seven with INVOKANA 100 mg, eight with INVOKANA 300 mg, one with non-INVOKANA) and in one patient aged >75 (INVOKANA 300 mg). None of the AEs leading to discontinuation were considered serious.

Osmotic Diuresis-Related AEs in Extension Phase of Glycemic Control Trials

In the seven INVOKANAphase 3 studies with extension phases, safety endpoints were evaluated in core and extension study periods. The core study period was up to 26 weeks in majority of the studies; 2-5, 7-11 and 52 weeks in two studies.8,9 Several phase 3 INVOKANAstudies included an extension phase,3, 4, 24-27  with the longest extension data available through 104 weeks.25,26

  • Most osmotic diuresis-related AEs occurred during the first 26 weeks (core period) of treatment.3,5,24,26,27

Osmotic Diuresis-Related AEs in the CANVAS Program

The CANVAS (CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study) Program28, 29 (N=10,142) comprises the two large INVOKANA cardiovascular (CV) outcome studies, CANVAS10, 30 and CANVAS-R12, 31, and includes a pre-specified integrated analysis of these two studies to meet Food and Drug Administration post-marketing requirement (PMR) for CV safety, as well as to evaluate potential for CV protection of INVOKANA in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients who had either a prior history of CV disease or ≥2 CV risk factors.28, 29

  • In the CANVAS study, osmotic diuresis-related events were reported at a rate of 34.5 and 13.3 per 1000 patient-years (PY) for the INVOKANA and PBO group, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 2.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.06 to 3.81; P<0.001).28, 32 For these events, the annualized incidence rates are reported through January 7, 2014; after this time, only serious AEs or AEs leading to discontinuation were collected.28
  • In a secondary analysis based on baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; <45, 45-<60, 60-<90, and ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2), osmotic diuresis-related events within the CANVAS program were similar across eGFR subgroups (P=0.17 for heterogeneity).33
  • Absolute risk of osmotic diuresis-related events was significantly lower in patients with a history of heart failure in the CANVAS study compared to those without (P interaction = 0.029).34

Osmotic Diuresis-Related AEs in CREDENCE

  • CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation), was a randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled, parallel group multicenter, event-driven trial (N=4401) to assess the effects of INVOKANA (100 mg) vs. PBO on clinically important renal outcomes in people with T2DM and established chronic kidney disease (CKD) and albuminuria who were receiving a stable, maximum tolerated or labeled dose (for >4 weeks prior to randomization) of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB).13, 35-39
  • In CREDENCE, osmotic diuresis-related events were reported at a rate of 10.0 and 8.2 per 1000 PY for the INVOKANA and PBO group, respectively (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.83 – 1.89).36

Phase 1 Studies

A transient and variable increase in urine output was observed that attenuated with continued treatment.18 Timed 24-hour urine collections were detailed in three phase 1 studies in T2DM patients: Sha et al (2014a), Sha et al (2014b), and Devineni et al (2012).14-16

Sha et al (2014) in a 12-week phase 1, double-blind, PBO-controlled, randomized, parallel group study evaluated the effects of INVOKANA 300 mg once daily vs PBO on 24-hour urine volume in patients with T2DM with inadequate glycemic control on metformin with or without other antihyperglycemic agents (N=36).15

  • Patients were also receiving concomitant therapy with ACEis or ARBs.
Results
  • Baseline mean 24-hour urine volume was comparable between INVOKANA 300 mg (3100 mL) and PBO (3272 mL).
  • At week 1, least square mean (LSM) change in 24-hour urine volume was 269.3 mL and 108.3 mL in the INVOKANA and PBO groups, respectively (PBO-subtracted LSM difference of 161.0; 95% CI [-397.6 to 719.6]).
  • At week 12, LSM change in 24-hour urine volume was 149.1 mL and 100.4 mL in the INVOKANA and PBO groups respectively (PBO-subtracted LSM difference of 48.7; 95% CI [-509.9 to 607.3]).
  • For additional information please visit https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01483781.

In another phase 1, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled study, Sha et al (2014) evaluated safety and tolerability of single and escalating doses of canagliflozin (liquid suspension formulation) 30 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg once daily, and 300 mg twice daily vs PBO for 2 weeks in inpatient patients with T2DM (N=111).18,14

  • At baseline, mean 24-hour urine volume was ~3-4L in all treatment groups.
  • Water was allowed ad libitum throughout the study.
  • At canagliflozin doses ≥200 mg once daily, an increase in 24-hour urine volume occurred on day 1. Transient increases in 24- hour urine volume occurred with canagliflozin doses ≥200 mg on Day 1, ranging from ~200-700 mL, and declined toward baseline over the 2-week dosing period.

Devineni et al (2012), a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled study, evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of INVOKANA 100 mg once daily and 300 mg twice daily vs PBO for 28 days in patients with T2DM not optimally controlled on insulin (N=29).16 Water was allowed ad libitum.

  • At baseline, mean 24-hour urine volume was ~3.5-4L in all treatment groups.18
  • Changes from baseline in the 24-hour urine volume were minimal across treatment groups [mean (standard deviation [SD]) changes]: -143.1 (433.8) mL for PBO, 47.2 (739.0) mL for INVOKANA 100 mg, and 97.0 (874.4) mL for INVOKANA 300 mg.16

Day and Night Time Urination

Day and night time urination were investigated in a phase 1 study.14,17

  • Water was allowed ad libitum throughout the study. The mean 24-hour fluid intake over a 2-week treatment period was 2.6-3.7L (PBO), 2.6-3.7L (30 mg), 2.1 to 4.0L (100 mg), 2.7-4.0L (200 mg), 3.0-4.4L (400 mg) daily, and 2.5-4.1L (300 mg twice daily).
  • Total daily fluid intake (including meal-related fluids) generally matched total daily urine volumes.
  • Patient-reported outcomes consisted of a questionnaire on frequency to urinate during day time hours, an uncomfortable urge to urinate, waking up at night due to the urge to urinate, and awakening due to other reasons than to urinate. These outcomes were collected on days -2, 4, 7, and 14. There were no apparent differences in day or evening urination symptoms between INVOKANA groups and the PBO group based on patientreported questionnaires.

Urine Specific Gravity

  • In pooled data from four2-5 26-week, PBO-controlled phase 3 studies, there were no notable changes in urine specific gravity with the combined INVOKANA group (100 mg and 300 mg, [n=1425]) and the PBO group (n=521).18

Urine pH

  • In pooled data from four2-5 26-week, PBO-controlled phase 3 studies, there was a slight non-dose-dependent mean percent reduction (-0.14%) in urine pH with the combined INVOKANA group (including 100 mg and 300 mg, [n=1425]) and a slight increase (0.06%) in the PBO group (n=521).18

Urine Osmolality

  • In a phase 1 study, urine osmolality increased in the combined INVOKANA group relative to PBO with greater increases observed in the INVOKANA 300 mg twice daily group.16

Dysuria

  • In a pooled analysis from four2-5 26-week, PBO-controlled studies, AEs of dysuria were reported with an incidence of 0.7% (6/833), 0.5% (4/834), and 0.3% (2/646) patients in the INVOKANA 100 mg, INVOKANA 300 mg, and PBO groups, respectively.18

A 7-day phase 1 study in patients with T2DM evaluated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of INVOKANA 50 mg, 100 mg or 300 mg once daily vs PBO. No notable difference was observed in median 24-hour urine volumes between the INVOKANA and PBO groups.40

A 1-year post-marketing observational study evaluating safety and efficacy of INVOKANA in Japanese patients >65 years of age with T2DM (N=1375) reported 1.31% (n=18) experienced 23 polyuria or pollakiuria events, including thirst, pollakiuria, nocturia, polyuria, and urine volume increased. None of the events were classified as serious.41

Polyuria/Pollakiuria

Real-World Evidence

Inagaki et al (2022) conducted a real-world, long-term, post-market surveillance study over the period of 3 years in Japanese patients with T2DM who were prescribed INVOKANA 100 mg once daily for the first time from December 2014 through September 2016.42

Results
  • Overall, 12,227 patients were included in the safety analysis, of whom 312 (10.73%) reported 1836 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and 225 (1.84%) reported 268 serious ADRs.42
  • ADRs associated with polyuria/pollakiuria were reported in 150 (1.23%) patients. Pollakiuria 96 (0.79%), cystitis 63 (0.52%), pruritus genital 59 (0.48%), and urinary tract infections 58 (0.47%) were the most common ADRs.19, 42
  • Except for 1 ADR of thirst, all ADRs associated with polyuria/pollakiuria were nonserious.42 See Table: ADRs Associated With Polyuria/Pollakiuria.
  • Median time of onset of ADRs associated with polyuria/pollakiuria was 36 days.19
  • In the following patient subgroups, the incidence of ADRs associated with polyuria/pollakiuria was higher: age ≥ 75 years; duration of T2DM ≥5 to <10, ≥10 to <15, or ≥15 years; and concurrent dyslipidemia.42 See Table: ADRs Associated With Polyuria/Pollakiuria Based on Age, Duration of T2DM, and eGFR.

ADRs Associated With Polyuria/Pollakiuria19
ADRs
n (%)
Pollakiuria
96 (0.79)
Thirst
30 (0.25)
Nocturia
21 (0.17)
Polyuria
12 (0.10)
Urine output increased
2 (0.02)
Micturition disorder
1 (0.01)
Abbreviation: ADR, adverse drug reaction.

ADRs Associated With Polyuria/Pollakiuria Based on Age, Duration of T2DM, and eGFR19
Patients with Polyuria/pollakiuria, n (%)
Incidence Per
100 Person-Years

Age, years
<65
76 (0.95)
0.42
≥65 to <75
49 (1.57)
0.70
≥75
25 (2.24)
1.08
Duration of T2DM, years
<3
20 (0.73)
0.34
≥3 to <5
14 (1.09)
0.48
≥5 to <10
40 (1.56)
0.69
≥10 to <15
25 (1.62)
0.72
≥15
31 (2.13)
0.96
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2
≥90
30 (1.08)
0.48
≥60 to <90
71 (1.30)
0.58
≥45 to <60
25 (2.10)
0.94

≥30 to <45
7 (2.29)
1.08
≥15 to <30
1 (1.85)
1.18
<15
0 (0)
0.00
Abbreviations: ADR, adverse drug reaction; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Additional analyses evaluating urine outcomes have also been conducted.43-47

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 11 May 2023.

References

1 J&J PRD. Clinical Study Report: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of ARN-509 in men with non-metastatic (M0) castration-resistant prostate cancer selective prostate AR targeting with ARN-509 (SPARTAN) Protocol ARN-509-003; Phase 3 JNJ-56021927 (apalutamide); 2017. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2018/rev_210951_arn-509-003_CSR_Redacted.pdf. Updated March 29, 2018. Accessed December 9, 2020.
2 Stenlof K,  Cefalu WT,  Kim K-A, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin monotherapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:372-382.
3 Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ,  Januszewicz A,  Davidson J, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with placebo and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes on background metformin monotherapy: a randomised trial. Diabetologia. 2013;56(12):2582-2592.
4 Wilding JP,  Charpentier G,  Hollander P, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin and sulphonylurea: a randomised trial. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67(12):1267-1282.
5 Forst T,  Guthrie R,  Goldenberg R, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin over 52 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes on background metformin and pioglitazone. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16:467-477.
6 Usiskin K,  Kline I,  Fung A, et al. Safety and Tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pooled Analysis of phase 3 studies. Special report. 2014;26(3):16-34.
7 Yale JF,  Bakris G,  Xi L, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in subjects with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(5):463-473.
8 Cefalu WT,  Leiter LA,  Yoon KH, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (CANTATA-SU): 52 week results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2013;382:941-950.
9 Schernthaner G,  Gross JL,  Rosenstock J, et al. Canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who do not have adequate glycemic control with metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 52-week randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:2508-2515.
10 Neal B,  Perkovic V,  de Zeeuw D, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS)-a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2013;166(2):217-223.
11 Bode B,  Stenlof K,  Sullivan D, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin treatment in older subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized trial. Hosp Pract. 2013;41(2):72-84.
12 Neal B,  Perkovic V,  Matthews D, et al. Rationale, design and baseline characteristics of the CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study-Renal (CANVAS-R):  a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(3):387-393.
13 Jardine MJ,  Mahaffey KW,  Neal B, et al. The Canagliflozin and Renal Endpoints in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) study rationale, design, and baseline characteristics. Am J Nephrol. 2017;46(6):462-472.
14 Sha S,  Devineni D,  Ghosh A, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, from a randomized study in patients with type 2 diabetes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e105638. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148334/pdf/pone.0105638.pdf. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105638.
15 Sha S,  Polidori D,  Heise T, et al. Effect of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, canagliflozin, on plasma volume in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(11):1087-1095.
16 Devineni D,  Morrow L,  Hompesch M, et al. Canagliflozin improves glycaemic control over 28 days in subjects with type 2 diabetes not optimally controlled on insulin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14:539-545.
17 Data on File. Clinical Protocol 28431754NAP1002. Janssen Research & Development, LLC. EDMS-PSDB-6657018; 2007.
18 Data on File. Integrated Summary of Safety: JNJ-28431754 (Canagliflozin). Janssen Research & Development, LLC. EDMS-ERI-32371649; May 2012.
19 Inagaki N,  Nangaku M,  Sakata Y, et al. Supplement to: Real-World safety and effectiveness of canagliflozin treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan: SAPPHIRE, a long-term, large-scale post-marketing surveillance. Adv Ther. 2022;39(1):674-691.
20 Weir MR,  Januszewicz A,  Gilbert RE, et al. Effect of canagliflozin on blood pressure and adverse events related to osmotic diuresis and reduced intravascular volume in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Hypertens. 2014;16(12):875-882.
21 Fulcher G,  Matthews DR,  Perkovic V, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin used in conjunction with sulfonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled trial. Diabetes Ther. 2015;6(3):289-302.
22 Neal B,  Perkovic V,  de Zeeuw D, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin, an inhibitor of sodium glucose cotransporter 2, when used in conjunction with insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(3):403-411.
23 Sinclair A,  Bode B,  Harris S, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in individuals aged 75 and older with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(3):543-552.
24 Stenlof K,  Cefalu WT,  Kim K-A, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of canagliflozin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and exercise: findings from the 52-Week CANTATA-M Study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30(2):163-175.
25 Leiter LA,  Yoon KH,  Arias P, et al. Canagliflozin provides durable glycemic improvements and body weight reduction over 104 weeks versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(3):355-364.
26 Bode B,  Stenlof K,  Harris S, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of canagliflozin over 104 weeks in patients aged 55 to 80 years with type 2 diabetes. Diab Obes Metab. 2015;17(3):294-303.
27 Yale J-F,  Bakris G,  Cariou B, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin over52 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. 2014;16:1016-1027.
28 Neal B,  Perkovic V,  Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:644-657. Published June 12. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1611925.
29 Neal B,  Perkovic V, Mahaffey K. Optimising the analysis strategy for the CANVAS Program - a pre-specified plan for the integrated analyses of the CANVAS and CANVAS-R trials. [Epub ahead of print]. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017. doi:10.1111/dom.12924.
30 CANVAS - CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study (NCT01032629). Janssen Research & Development, LLC; 2009. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01032629. Accessed 06Dec2016.
31 Janssen Research & Development. (Posted 2013). A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Effects of Canagliflozin on Renal Endpoints in Adult Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (NCT01989754). https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01989754.
32 Hollander P,  Mohan V,  Woo V, et al. Overall safety of canagliflozin (CANA) in the CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program. Oral presentation presented at: 78th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association (ADA); June 22-26, 2018; Orlando, FL.
33 Neuen BL,  Ohkuma T,  Neal B, et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with canagliflozin according to baseline kidney function: Data from the CANVAS Program. Circulation. 2018;pii:CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035901 [Epub ahead of print].
34 Radholm K,  Figtree G,  Perkovic V, et al. Canagliflozin and heart failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2018;138(5):458-468.
35 Perkovic V,  Jardine MJ,  Neal B, et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2295-2306.
36 Perkovic V,  Jardine MJ,  Neal B, et al. Supplementary Appendix for: Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2295-2306.
37 Perkovic V,  Jardine MJ,  Neal B, et al. Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy: Protocol & Statistical Analysis Plan [published online ahead of print April 14 2019]. NEJM. 2019. Published 14 April 2019. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1811744.
38 Jardine MJ,  Mahaffey KW,  Neal B, et al. Supplementary Material for: The Canagliflozin and Renal Endpoints in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) Study Rationale, Design, and Baseline Characteristics. Am J Nephrol. 2017;46(6).
39 Wheeler DC,  Bakris G,  Jardine MJ, et al. CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation). Symposium presented at the ISN World Congress of Nephrology (WCN); 15 April 2019; Melbourne, Australia. Available at: http://www.georgeinstitute.org/sites/default/files/credence-trial-results.pptx. Webcast available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZC6PSN7Jt8. 2019.
40 Devineni D,  Curtin C,  Polidori D, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co- transporter 2 inhibitor, in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;53:601-610.
41 Goda M,  Yamakura T,  Sasaki K, et al. Safety and efficacy of canagliflozin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 1-year post-marketing surveillance in Japan. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018;34(2):319-327.
42 Inagaki N,  Nangaku M,  Sakata Y, et al. Real-World safety and effectiveness of canagliflozin treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan: SAPPHIRE, a long-term, large-scale post-marketing surveillance. Adv Ther. 2022;39(1):674-691.
43 Tanaka H,  Kazuhiko T,  Iijima H, et al. Factors affecting canagliflozin-induced transient urine volume increase in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Adv Ther. 2017;34(2):436-451.
44 Shao YL,  Yee KH,  Koh SK, et al. Short-term outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin in a real-world setting. Singapore Med J. 2018;59(5):251-256.
45 Tamborlane WV,  Polidori D,  Argenti D, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of canagliflozin in pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes. [published online ahead of print December 22, 2017]. Pediatr Diabetes. doi:10.1111/pedi.12626.
46 Harashima S,  Inagaki N,  Kondo K, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin as add-on therapy to a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A 52-week, open-label, phase IV study. Diab Obes Metab. 2018;20(1):1770-1775.
47 Cai M,  Shao X,  Xing F, et al. Efficacy of canagliflozin versus metformin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022;24(2):312-320.