This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

nipocalimab

Medical Information

Clinical Studies in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP)

Last Updated: 10/10/2024

SUMMARY

  • Nipocalimab, a high-affinity, fully human, aglycosylated monoclonal antibody, is an investigational agent being studied for the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).1,2
    • Although the pathophysiology of CIDP is not well understood, clinical evidence suggests a role of pathogenic immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies.3
    • Since nipocalimab reduces the levels of circulating IgG, including levels of pathogenic IgG autoantibodies, it is hypothesized to be potentially effective in the treatment of CIDP.3,4
  • An ongoing, phase 2/3, multistage, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group withdrawal study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in adult patients with CIDP (NCT05327114).2

BACKGROUND

  • CIDP is a rare, acquired, heterogeneous, autoimmune disorder characterized by inflammatory peripheral polyneuropathy due to immune-mediated demyelination of the peripheral nerves, leading to progressive sensory loss, weakness, and loss of reflexes.5-8
  • CIDP, particularly acute-onset CIDP (A-CIDP), presents with signs and symptoms similar to those of Guillain-Barré syndrome, including paresthesia, progressive weakness in the distal limbs, and difficulty in walking. Patients with A-CIDP often retain the ability to walk independently and exhibit respiratory or autonomic nervous system involvement.9,10
  • A global 2019 meta-analysis reported the prevalence of CIDP as 2.81 per 100,000 individuals (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-4.39), and the crude incidence of CIDP as 0.33 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI, 0.21-0.53).9,11
    • CIDP is 1.4-4.4 times more prevalent in men than in women and can occur at any age. A higher incidence is observed in patients aged >55 years. 9,11
  • While the exact pathophysiology of CIDP remains unclear, both cellular and humoral components of the immune system have been implicated. Evidence suggests that several autoantibodies, including pathogenic IgG autoantibodies, targeting nodes of Ranvier and paranodes in patients with CIDP are likely to be pathogenic.4,8,12

CLINICAL DATA

Phase 2/3 Study: ARISE

An ongoing, phase 2/3, multistage, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group withdrawal study (ARISE) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of nipocalimab vs placebo in adult patients with CIDP.2,3

Study Design/Methods

  • The estimated enrollment is 201 patients.2
  • The study consists of the following periods2,3:
    • Screening: to determine eligibility.
    • Run-in: to determine if patients have active CIDP.
    • Treatment:
      • Stage A (open-label): Patients will receive open-label nipocalimab intravenously (IV) to determine clinically meaningful improvements in CIDP symptoms and functional ability. Responders will be eligible to enter stage B.
      • Stage B (double-blind): Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive nipocalimab IV every 2 weeks (q2w) or placebo. Patients who relapse during this period will be discontinued and treated with rescue medication.
    • Open-label extension (OLE) (variable length): Patients will receive nipocalimab IV q2w.
    • Safety follow-up: A visit is required 8 weeks after the last infusion of nipocalimab, irrespective of when that infusion occurs.
Objectives
  • Primary objective: Time to first occurrence of a relapse event (up to week 52) in stage B.2
  • Secondary objectives: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of nipocalimab vs placebo and the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of nipocalimab.3
  • Stage A key objectives: To assess the improvement in symptoms, disease severity, and disease progression with nipocalimab.3
  • Stage B key objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of nipocalimab vs placebo in terms of time to CIDP disease progression and improved functional level relative to stage B baseline.3
  • The study design is shown in Figure: ARISE Study Design.

ARISE Study Design2,3

Abbreviations: CDAS, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy disease activity status; CIDP, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; CISP, chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy; CS, corticosteroids; EAN/PNS, European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society; INCAT, inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment; IV, intravenous; IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin; LD, loading dose; OLE, open label extension; PD, pharmacodynamics; PK, pharmacokinetics; Q2W, every 2 weeks; R, randomization; SCIg, subcutaneous immunoglobulin.
aPer EAN/PNS 2021 criteria and confirmed by independent adjudication committee.
bA score of 2 must be exclusively from leg disability.
cPer EAN/PNS 2021 criteria.
d
Concomitant polyneuropathy of other causes (such as mild, stable diabetic polyneuropathy) may not be exclusionary if CIDP is confirmed as the main diagnosis by the investigator and adjudication committee.

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 10 June 2024.

 

References

1 Ling LE, Hillson JL, Tiessen RG, et al. M281, an anti‐FcRn antibody: pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety across the full range of IgG reduction in a first‐in‐human study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105(4):1031-1039.  
2 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Efficacy and safety study of nipocalimab for adults with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2024 April 29]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05327114 NLM Identifier: NCT05327114.  
3 Ford L, Wong J, Youssef EA, et al. A phase 2/3 placebo-controlled, parallel group, randomized withdrawal study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nipocalimab for adults with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: the ARISE study. Oral Presentation presented at: American Academy of Neurology annual meeting; April 22-27, 2023; Boston, MA.  
4 Bunschoten C, Jacobs BC, Van den Bergh PYK, et al. Progress in diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(8):784-794.  
5 Mahdi-Rogers M, Rajabally YA. Overview of the pathogenesis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy with intravenous immunoglobulins. Biologics. 2010;4:45-49.  
6 Stino AM, Naddaf E, Dyck PJ, et al. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy-diagnostic pitfalls and treatment approach. Muscle Nerve. 2021;63(2):157-169.  
7 Querol L, Rojas-García R, Diaz-Manera J, et al. Rituximab in treatment-resistant CIDP with antibodies against paranodal proteins. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2015;2(5):e149.  
8 Mathey EK, Park SB, Hughes RA, et al. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: from pathology to phenotype. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86(9):973-985.  
9 Van den Bergh PYK, van Doorn PA, Hadden RDM, et al. European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: report of a joint task force—second revision. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28(11):3556-3583.  
10 Ruts L, Drenthen J, Jacobs BC, et al. Distinguishing acute-onset CIDP from fluctuating Guillain-Barre syndrome: a prospective study. Neurology. 2010;74(21):1680-1686.  
11 Broers MC, Bunschoten C, Nieboer D, et al. Incidence and prevalence of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology. 2019;52(3-4):161-172.  
12 Latov N. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(8):435-446.