(macitentan)
This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.
Last Updated: 01/24/2025
RUBATO-DB (NCT03153137) was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3, 52-week study to assess the efficacy and safety of OPSUMIT in Fontan-palliated patients aged 12 years and older (RUBATO-DB) and an open-label (OL) extension trial (RUBATO-OL). Patients were randomized to receive OPSUMIT or placebo.1
The screening period of RUBATO-DB was ≤30 days), followed by DB treatment up to 52 weeks and a safety follow-up period of ≥30 days following permanent treatment discontinuation. The end-of study corresponded to the last visit performed.1
Inclusion Criteria: RUBATO-DB enrolled patients aged 12 years and older, who had undergone either a total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) (intra-atrial lateral tunnel [LT-TCPC] or extracardiac conduit [EC TCPC]) Fontan procedure >1 year before screening and were New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA FC) II or III. TCPC surgeries could occur following a prior classical atrio-pulmonary connection.1
Exclusion Criteria: Patients were excluded if they showed signs of Fontan palliation deterioration within the past 3 months or had CPET limitations (including pacemakers), peak VO2 <15 mL/kg/min at baseline, or systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg (<85 mm Hg for those under 18 years and <150 cm in height) at rest or during CPET at screening or baseline.1
A total of 137 patients were randomized to OPSUMIT (n=68) and placebo (n=69) treatments.1 The patient baseline characteristics are presented in the Table: Baseline Characteristics.
Demographic/Characteristic | OPSUMIT (n=68) | Placebo (n=69) |
---|---|---|
Age, years | ||
Mean | 23.2 (5.82) | 24.5 (7.49) |
Median | 22 (19-27) | 24 (20-28) |
Male, n (%) | 45 (66.2) | 44 (63.8) |
Geographical region, n (%) | ||
Europe | 40 (58.8) | 42 (60.9) |
America | 14 (20.6) | 12 (17.4) |
Oceania | 9 (13.2) | 8 (11.6) |
Asia | 5 (7.4) | 7 (10.1) |
Race, n (%) | ||
Asian | 6 (8.8) | 10 (14.5) |
White | 55 (80.9) | 52 (75.4) |
Other | 7 (10.3) | 7 (10.1) |
BMI, kg/m2 | ||
Mean | 23.4 (4.19) | 23.7 (4.81) |
Median | 22.3 (20.8-26.1) | 22.5 (20.1-26.2) |
NYHA FC, n (%) | ||
Class II | 66 (97.1) | 67 (97.1) |
Class III | 2 (2.9) | 2 (2.9) |
SpO2, % | ||
Mean | 92.8 (2.84) | 92.6 (3.22) |
Median | 93 (91-95) | 92 (90-95) |
Peak VO2, mL/kg/mina | ||
Mean | 24.4 (5.93) | 23.8 (6) |
Median | 23.9 (19.2-28.2) | 22.9 (18.5-28.4) |
Associated dominant ventricular morphology, n (%) | ||
Left | 33 (48.5) | 44 (63.8) |
Right/mixed | 35 (51.5) | 25 (36.2) |
Type of primary Fontan completion, n (%) | ||
LT-TCPC | 45 (66.2) | 40 (58) |
EC-TCPC | 23 (33.8) | 29 (42) |
Time since Fontan completion, yearsb | ||
Mean | 18.3 (5.8) | 17.8 (5.6) |
Median | 18.4 (4.3-30) | 18.6 (1.3-30.6) |
Fenestration status | ||
No, never had | 34 (50) | 28 (40.6) |
No, initially yes, then closed | 20 (29.4) | 24 (34.8) |
Yes, open | 13 (19.1) | 14 (20.3) |
Yes, initially no, now open | 1 (1.5) | 3 (4.3) |
Note: Mean is reported as mean±SD. Median is reported as median (IQR). Values are presented as n (%) unless otherwise noted.Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; EC-TCPC, extracardiac conduit total cavopulmonary connection; IQR, interquartile range; LT-TCPC, lateral tunnel total cavopulmonary connection; NYHA FC, New York Heart Association functional class; SD, standard deviation; SpO2, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation; VO2, oxygen uptake/consumption at ventilatory anaerobic threshold.aValue invalid for 1 patient in each of the treatment armsbInformation available for all except 1 patient in the OPSUMIT arm |
A total of 92.7% patients completed DB treatment, and 7 (10.3%) patients in the OPSUMIT group and 3 (4.3%) in the placebo group prematurely discontinued treatment. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of RUBATO-DB study treatment was similar in the OPSUMIT (52.3 [52-53.1] weeks) and placebo (52.9 [52.1-54.1] weeks) groups.1
RUBATO-DB: Efficacy
Efficacy Endpoint | OPSUMIT (n=68) | Placebo (n=69) |
---|---|---|
Primary endpoint | ||
Mean peak VO2, mL/kg/min | ||
Baseline | 24.36 (5.93), n=67 | 23.76 (6), n=68 |
Change from baseline to week 16 | -0.16 (2.86), n=68a | -0.67 (2.66), n=69a |
Difference of LS means (99% CI), 2-sided P value | 0.62 (-0.62 to 1.85), P=0.1930b | |
Secondary endpointsc | ||
Mean peak VO2, mL/kg/min | ||
Change from baseline over 52 weeks (average of week 16 and week 52) | -0.08 (2.52), n=50d | -0.52 (1.97), n=47d |
Difference of LS means (99% CI), 2-sided P value | 0.57 (-0.53 to 1.68), P=0.1765e | |
Count per minute of daily physical activity measured by accelerometer | ||
Baseline | 340.6 (145.3), n=61 | 325.6 (132.7), n=58 |
Change from baseline to week 16 | -3 (92.4), n=61a | -14.3 (117.6), n=58a |
Difference of LS means (99% CI), 2-sided P value | 14.3 (-35.2 to 64), P=0.4512f | |
Note: Values are presented as mean±SD unless otherwise specified. Difference from placebo is the median unbiased estimate with corresponding repeated 99% CIs. Final adjusted 2-sided P value based on the weighted combination test statistic.Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; COVID, coronavirus disease; LS, least squares; SD, standard deviation; VO2, oxygen uptake/consumption at ventilatory anaerobic threshold.an values include patients with the change from baseline after addressing intercurrent events/missing data.bAnalysis of covariance model, including randomized treatment group, geographical region, and baseline value as covariates in the model.cThe primary endpoint was not met at the 2-sided 1% alpha or 5% alpha levels; therefore, in accordance with the predefined testing sequence, both secondary efficacy endpoints were not formally evaluated, and P values should be considered as nominal for both secondary endpoints.dn values include patients with observed values at baseline, week 16, and week 52 (without imputations as per intercurrent event strategies).eMixed model for repeated measures model included randomized treatment group, time (via a categorical variable for visit), treatment-by-time interaction, baseline-by-time interaction and baseline value as fixed effects.fAnalysis of covariance model included randomized treatment group and baseline value as covariates. |
Other Efficacy Endpoints
There were no treatment differences in other exercise capacity endpoints, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels at week 16, time to Fontan-palliated clinical worsening, or time to Fontan-related morbidity events.1
DB Study Endpoint: Pharmacokinetics
At weeks 4 and 16 (end-of-treatment), the geometric mean trough concentrations of OPSUMIT were 148 mcg/L and 144 mcg/L, respectively; and the OPSUMIT metabolite level at both the timepoints were 882 mcg/L and 896 mcg/L, respectively. Female patients had slightly higher trough concentrations of OPSUMIT and its metabolite (ACT-132577) than male patients at both time points.1
RUBATO-DB: Safety
A total of 48 (70.6%) and 44 (63.8%) patients in the OPSUMIT and placebo groups, respectively, reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Hepatic AE of special interests (AESIs) occurred in 5 (7.4%) and 3 (4.5%) patients in the OPSUMIT and placebo groups, respectively. Three (4.4%) patients in the OPSUMIT group and 1 patient in the placebo group (1.4%) reported marked liver test abnormalities, leading to study drug discontinuation in 2 patients in the OPSUMIT group and interruption of study treatment in 1 patient in the placebo group. During the treatment period, no patients reported increase in alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels >5 × upper limit of normal (ULN). Edema and fluid retention AESIs occurred in 5 (7.4%) and 2 (2.9%) patients in the OPSUMIT and placebo groups, respectively. Anemia/hemoglobin decrease AESIs occurred in 1 OPSUMIT-treated patient and hypotension AESI occurred in 1 patient in each treatment group.1 For more information regarding safety, see the Table: Safety Profile below.
Events | OPSUMIT (n=68) | Placebo (n=69) | Patients With ≥1 Dose of OPSUMIT in Either DB or OL Study; Total OPSUMIT Analysis Set (n=122) |
---|---|---|---|
TEAE | 48 (70.6) | 44 (63.8) | 92 (75.4) |
Severe TEAEa | 7 (10.3) | 5 (7.2) | 13 (10.7) |
Treatment-related TEAEa | 11 (16.2) | 5 (7.2) | 23 (18.9) |
TEAE leading to death | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.8) |
Serious TEAEa | 13 (19.1) | 9 (13) | 29 (23.8) |
Treatment-related serious TEAE | 1 (1.5) | 0 | 2 (1.6) |
TEAE leading to discontinuation of study treatment | 3 (4.4) | 1 (1.4) | 5 (4.1) |
Note: Data are presented as n (%) unless otherwise stated.Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; DB, double-blind; OL, open-label; TEAE, treatment-emergent AE. aIncluding any TEAE with missing information for this category. |
Eligible patients entered the single-arm RUBATO-OL study (NCT03775421), which was planned until 104 weeks of treatment for each patient, following completion of RUBATO-DB by the last patient. Patients received OL OPSUMIT once daily, without revealing the previous RUBATO-DB treatment.1
Patients who completed week 52 and did not meet the exclusion criteria of RUBATO-DB were enrolled in the RUBATO-OL study and received the first dose of OL OPSUMIT immediately. The treatment period initiated with the first dose of OL OPSUMIT in RUBATO-OL and lasted until whichever of the following occurred first:5
In RUBATO-OL, the safety follow-up period started the day following the last intake of study treatment and ended 30-35 days thereafter with the RUBATO-OL end-of-study (EOS) visit.5
RUBATO-DB and RUBATO-OL: Efficacy in Pool Full Analysis Set
There was a decrease in both peak VO2 and VO2 at VAT from DB-baseline to OL-week 52. The median (IQR) change in daily physical activity (counts/minute) as measured via accelerometer from DB-baseline to OL-week 52 in the placebo/OPSUMIT group (n=13) was -38.4 (-81.1 to 83.6) counts per minute and in the OPSUMIT/OPSUMIT group (n=17) was 67.3 (-33.2 to 142.5) counts per minute. Over both studies, Fontan-palliated clinical worsening events were reported in 3 patients in the placebo/OPSUMIT group and 6 patients in the OPSUMIT/OPSUMIT group.1
RUBATO-DB and RUBATO-OL: Safety Data From the Total OPSUMIT Treatment-Emergent Period
During either study, 75.4% of patients experienced ≥1 TEAE while receiving OPSUMIT. COVID-19 (16 [13.1%]), headache (13 [10.7%]) and fatigue (9 [7.4%]) were the most frequently reported TEAEs. Two SAEs related to study intervention were reported (increased AST and ALT in 1 OPSUMIT-treated patient during DB and decreased sperm concentration and decreased spermatozoa progressive motility in 1 DB-placebo patient with a medical history of fertility disorders during OL). OPSUMIT was discontinued in both patients. One DB-placebo patient died during the RUBATO-OL study which was not related to the study intervention. Hepatic AESIs (≥1) were reported in 10 (8.2%) OPSUMIT-treated patients across the RUBATO-DB and RUBATO-OL studies. RUBATO-OL was prematurely discontinued because RUBATO-DB did not meet the primary or secondary endpoints.1
Evidence gathered from the literature is summarized in Table: OPSUMIT in Patients Who Have Undergone a Fontan Procedure.
Reference | Study Overview | Efficacy Outcomes | Safety Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Deniwar et al (2022)2 |
|
|
|
Agnoletti et al (2017)3 |
|
|
|
Demetriades et al (2017)4 |
|
|
|
Abbreviations: BSA, body surface area; CPET, cardiopulmonary exercise testing; L, left; m, minutes; mPAP, mean pulmonary arterial pressure; NYHA, New York Heart Association; O2, oxygen; PAP, pulmonary arterial hypertension; PH, pulmonary hypertension; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; Qpi, pulmonary output; Qsi, systemic output; R, right; SVR, systemic vascular resistance; TCPC, total cavopulmonary connection; TPG, transpulmonary gradient; VV, veno-venous; WU, Woods units; y, years. |
A literature search of MEDLINE®
1 | Clift P, Berger F, Sondergaard L, et al. Efficacy and safety of macitentan in Fontan-palliated patients: 52-week randomized, placebo-controlled RUBATO Phase 3 trial and open-label extension. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024. |
2 | |
3 | |
4 | |
5 |