This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.
SUMMARY
- RYBREVANT (amivantamab-vmjw) is a low fucose, fully human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1)-based bispecific antibody with immune cell-directing activity that targets epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) mutations and amplifications in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).1
- LAZCLUZE (lazertinib) is a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).2
- SKIPPirr (NCT05663866) is an ongoing, phase 2, global, open-label study evaluating the potential of 4 independent prophylactic strategies in reducing the incidence and severity of RYBREVANT-associated infusion-related reactions (IRRs) in patients with EGFR-mutated (Exon 19 deletion [Exon19del] or Exon 21 L858R substitution) advanced or metastatic NSCLC with disease progression on or after sequential osimertinib and doublet platinum-based chemotherapy (N=68). Prior to the administration of intravenous (IV) RYBREVANT and lazertinib orally (PO), patients received prophylaxis in 1 of 4 different treatment cohorts (dexamethasone [DEX] 4 mg; DEX 8 mg; montelukast 10 mg; methotrexate 25 mg) following Simon’s 2-stage design with an expansion stage. The primary endpoint is the incidence of IRRs at cycle (C)1 day (D)1.3-5
- Only the DEX 8 mg cohort met the success criteria for IRR incidence rate (stage 1, IRR in ≤3 of 6 patients; stage 2, IRR in ≤8 of 16 patients) and passed both stage 1 (IRR, 2 of 6 patients) and stage 2 (IRR, 6 of 16 patients) to proceed to the expansion stage.4,5
- On C1D1, 22.5% (9 of 40) of patients receiving DEX 8 mg prophylactic treatment reported IRRs (all grade 1-2), compared with 67.4% with standard IRR management (Table: Incidence of IRRs on C1D1). The most frequent IRR-related symptoms in the DEX 8 mg cohort were nausea (8%), dyspnea (5%), and hypotension (5%).5
- By the end of C3, 10 of 41 patients (24.4%) in the DEX 8 mg cohort had experienced IRRs, 9 of whom had IRRs on C1D1 and 1 patient on C2D1 (all grade 1-2 in severity, except for 1 grade 3 IRR on C2D1).5
- At the median follow-up of 4.2 months, investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) was 33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19-49) for all responders and 28% (95% CI, 15-44) for confirmed responders.5
- Prophylaxis-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 3 patients in the DEX 8 mg cohort, with 1 patient each experiencing gastroesophageal reflux disease, muscle atrophy, and somnolence. These AEs were grade 1-2 in severity.5
- The median duration of RYBREVANT infusion on C1D1 in the DEX 8 mg cohort was 4.4 hours (range, 3.9-7.5). Median time in treatment room, time in chair, and active healthcare provider (HCP) time were 5.9, 5.9, and 7.7 hours, respectively.5
clinical study
Study Design/Methods
- Ongoing, phase 2, global, open-label study evaluating the potential of DEX, montelukast, and methotrexate in preventing RYBREVANT-associated IRRs in patients with EGFR-mutated (Exon19del or Exon 21 L858R) advanced or metastatic NSCLC with disease progression on or after osimertinib and doublet platinum-based chemotherapy using Simon’s 2-stage design with an expansion stage if a cohort passed both stages.3-5
- Prior to the administration of RYBREVANT IV and lazertinib PO, patients received prophylaxis in 1 of 4 different treatment cohorts as follows: DEX 4 mg PO, DEX 8 mg PO, montelukast 10 mg PO, and subcutaneous (SC) methotrexate 25 mg.5
- All patients received RYBREVANT IV 1050 mg (1400 mg if ≥80 kg) once weekly for 4 weeks and then every 2 weeks thereafter, in combination with lazertinib 240 mg PO once daily. Initial RYBREVANT dose was administered as a split dose over 2 days on C1D1 (350 mg) and C1D2 (remainder of dose).5
- All patients also received standard premedication with antihistamines, antipyretics, and DEX 10 mg IV.5
- Dosing for the DEX 8 mg cohort was DEX 8 mg (two 4 mg tablets) PO twice daily at home 2 days and 1 day prior to the RYBREVANT infusion, and 1 dose of DEX 8 mg PO 1 hour before the RYBREVANT infusion on C1D1 in the clinic (with standard antihistamine, antipyretic, and DEX 10 mg IV). Adequate oral hydration was encouraged with prophylactic DEX PO.5,6
- The study design is shown in Figure: SKIPPirr Study Design.
SKIPPirr Study Design3,4,6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fc3c/3fc3c7f012348ef4604c660a5f28e5f5aead0916" alt=""
SKIPPirr (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05663866) data cutoff: June 24, 2024.
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; BID, twice daily; C, cycle; D, day; DOR, duration of response; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; Exon19del, Exon 19 deletion; h, hour; ILD, interstitial lung disease; IRR, infusion-related reaction; IV, intravenous; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; ORR, objective response rate; PD-1, programmed cell death-1; PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1; PO, orally; QD, once daily; QW, once a week; Q2W, every 2 weeks; SC, subcutaneous; SET, study evaluation team; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
aPrior use of first- or second-generation EGFR TKI was allowed if administered before osimertinib.
bPatients in all cohorts also received standard premedication with antihistamines, antipyretics, and glucocorticoids.
c1400 mg if body weight ≥80 kg.
dPatients were sequentially enrolled into prophylactic regimens.
eIf both cohorts had positive results, only 1 moved on to stage 2 as determined by the SET.
fStage 1 was stopped if ≥4 of 6 patients experienced IRRs. The null hypothesis was rejected if ≤8 of 16 patients experienced IRRs, and the cohort was deemed promising in reducing IRRs.
gThe cohort proceeded to the expansion stage if Simon’s 2-stage design was positive.
hIRR on C1D1 was defined as events occurring within 24 h of initiating the C1D1 amivantamab infusion and before initiating the C1D2 infusion.
Results
Patient Characteristics
- A total of 68 patients received prophylaxis across 4 different treatment cohorts: DEX 4 mg (n=6), DEX 8 mg (n=41), montelukast 10 mg (n=15), and methotrexate 25 mg (n=6).5
- The patient demographics and baseline characteristics are included in Table: Demographics and Baseline Characteristics.
Demographics and Baseline Characteristcs5
|
|
|
---|
Median age, years (range)
| 62 (32-82)
| 63.5 (32-82)
|
Female, n (%)
| 26 (63)
| 44 (65)
|
Race, n (%)
|
Asian
| 24 (59)
| 42 (62)
|
White
| 10 (24)
| 18 (26)
|
Black or African American
| 1 (2)
| 1 (1)
|
Not reported
| 6 (15)
| 7 (10)
|
ECOG PS 1, n (%)
| 32 (78)
| 51 (75)
|
Brain metastases, n (%)
| 15 (37)
| 30 (44)
|
EGFR mutation type, n (%)
|
Exon 19 deletion
| 29 (71)
| 45 (66)
|
Exon 21 L858R
| 12 (29)
| 23 (34)
|
Median prior lines of therapy (range)
| 3 (2-9)
| 3 (2-9)
|
Abbreviations: C, cycle; D, day; DEX, dexamethasone; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; IRR, infusion-related reaction. aOne patient did not receive RYBREVANT infusion on C1D1 per protocol and was excluded from the primary endpoint analysis, but did not experience an IRR in the study.
|
Primary Endpoint
Incidence and Severity of IRRs on C1D1
- The DEX 4 mg and methotrexate cohorts did not pass stage 1, as IRRs were reported in 5 of 6 patients (83.3%) each.5
- The montelukast cohort passed stage 1 (IRR, 3 of 6 patients) but not stage 2 (IRR, 10 of 15 patients; 66.7%).4,5
- The DEX 8 mg cohort passed both stage 1 (IRR, 2 of 6 patients) and stage 2 (IRR, 6 of 16 patients) to proceed to the expansion stage.4,5
- At the data cutoff date of June 24, 2024, an additional 24 patients were enrolled and treated in the expansion stage.5
Incidence of IRRs on C1D15
|
|
|
---|
Grade 1-2
| 22.5
| 65.3
|
Grade ≥3
| -
| 2.1
|
Abbreviations: C, cycle; D, day; DEX, dexamethasone; IRR, infusion-related reaction; RP2D, recommended phase 2 dose. aIncludes IRRs from 380 patients treated at the RP2D in the CHRYSALIS study (data cutoff: March 30, 2021). The majority (98.4%) of IRRs occurred on C1D1 (overall IRR rate, 66.3%; grade ≥3 IRR, 1.8%). Note: Clinical cutoff, C1D2. Patients from historical data in the standard IRR management group received standard premedications (antihistamines, antipyretics, and glucocorticoids).
|
Incidence of IRR-Related Symptoms on C1D15
|
|
|
---|
Chills
| -
| 24
|
Dyspnea
| 5
| 22
|
Nausea
| 8
| 18
|
Flushing
| 3
| 18
|
Chest discomfort
| 3
| 11
|
Vomiting
| -
| 10
|
Pyrexia
| -
| 7
|
Cough
| -
| 6
|
Hypotension
| 5
| 6
|
Hypertension
| -
| 5
|
Hypoxia
| -
| 5
|
Oxygen saturation decreased
| -
| 3
|
Pruritus
| -
| 3
|
Sinus tachycardia
| 3
| 3
|
Tachycardia
| -
| 3
|
Dizziness
| -
| 3
|
Rash
| 3
| 2
|
Hot flush
| 3
| 2
|
Back pain
| 3
| 1
|
Erythema
| 3
| 1
|
Malaise
| 3
| 1
|
Chest pain
| 3
| 0.5
|
Face edema
| 3
| 0.5
|
Hypoesthesia
| 3
| 0.3
|
Choking sensation
| 3
| -
|
Abbreviations: C, cycle; D, day; DEX, dexamethasone; IRR, infusion-related reaction; IV, intravenous; RP2D, recommended phase 2 dose. aIncludes IRR symptoms on C1D1 with RYBREVANT IV monotherapy from 380 patients treated at the RP2D in the CHRYSALIS study (data cutoff: March 30, 2021).
Note: Clinical cutoff, C1D2. Patients from historical data in the standard IRR management group received standard premedications (antihistamines, antipyretics, and glucocorticoids).
|
Secondary Endpoints
Incidence and Severity of IRRs in Subsequent Cycles
- By the end of C3, 10 of 41 patients (24.4%) in the DEX 8 mg cohort had experienced IRRs.5
- Nine of these patients had IRRs on C1D1 (with 1 patient also experiencing an IRR on C1D2); 1 patient had an IRR on C2D1.
- All IRRs were grade 1-2, except for the 1 grade 3 IRR that occurred on C2D1.
Efficacy
- At the median follow-up of 4.2 months, the investigator-assessed ORR for all responders and confirmed responders in the DEX 8 mg cohort remained consistent with previous reports.5
- Efficacy outcomes are summarized in Table: Investigator-Assessed Efficacy Outcomes.
Investigator-Assessed Efficacy Outcomes6
|
|
---|
ORR, % (95% CI)
|
All responders
| 33 (19-49)
|
Confirmed responders
| 28 (15-44)
|
Best response, n (%)b
|
CR
| 0
|
PR
| 11 (28)
|
SD
| 16 (40)
|
Non-CR/Non-PDc
| 2 (5)
|
PD
| 10 (25)
|
NE/unknown
| 1 (3)
|
CBR,d % (95% CI)
| 73 (56-85)
|
DOR, months (95% CI)
| NE (4.2-NE)
|
Abbreviations: CBR, clinical benefit rate; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; DEX, dexamethasone; DOR, duration of response; NE, not estimable; ORR, objective response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease. aOne patient who did not receive prophylaxis per protocol was excluded from the efficacy analyses. bAmong confirmed responders. cNon-CR/non-PD was defined as persistence of ≥1 non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. dCBR was defined as the percentage of patients with CR, PR, SD, or non-CR/non-PD.
|
Safety
- Safety data are included in Table: Safety Profile.
- In the DEX 8 mg cohort, the most common AEs related to EGFR inhibition (rash, 41%; paronychia, 39%) and MET inhibition (hypoalbuminemia, 41%) were similar to those observed across all cohorts and consistent with previous reports.5
- In the DEX 8 mg cohort, 3 patients experienced AEs potentially related to DEX prophylaxis, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, muscle atrophy, and somnolence (1 event each). These AEs were grade 1-2 in severity.5
|
|
|
---|
|
|
|
|
---|
Associated with EGFR inhibition
|
Rash
| 17 (41)
| 0
| 30 (44)
| 4 (6)
|
Paronychia
| 16 (39)
| 0
| 30 (44)
| 0
|
Stomatitis
| 14 (34)
| 1 (2)
| 20 (29)
| 1 (1)
|
Pruritus
| 5 (12)
| 0
| 14 (21)
| 1 (1)
|
Dermatitis acneiform
| 7 (17)
| 0
| 12 (18)
| 0
|
Diarrhea
| 7 (17)
| 1 (2)
| 12 (18)
| 1 (1)
|
Associated with MET inhibition
|
Hypoalbuminemia
| 17 (41)
| 0
| 24 (35)
| 1 (1)
|
Peripheral edema
| 9 (22)
| 0
| 14 (21)
| 0
|
Other
|
IRR
| 10 (24)
| 1 (2)
| 31 (46)
| 2 (3)
|
Nausea
| 10 (24)
| 1 (2)
| 22 (32)
| 2 (3)
|
Epistaxis
| 9 (22)
| 0
| 13 (19)
| 0
|
Dyspnea
| 8 (20)
| 1 (2)
| 11 (16)
| 2 (3)
|
Hypoesthesia
| 8 (20)
| 0
| 14 (21)
| 0
|
Headache
| 8 (20)
| 0
| 10 (15)
| 0
|
Constipation
| 8 (20)
| 0
| 12 (18)
| 0
|
Hypotension
| 8 (20)
| 2 (5)
| 9 (13)
| 2 (3)
|
Asthenia
| 7 (17)
| 2 (5)
| 12 (18)
| 3 (4)
|
Dry skin
| 6 (15)
| 0
| 10 (15)
| 1 (1)
|
Pain in extremity
| 5 (12)
| 0
| 10 (15)
| 0
|
Decreased appetite
| 4 (10)
| 0
| 11 (16)
| 2 (3)
|
Chills
| 0
| 0
| 10 (15)
| 0
|
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; DEX, dexamethasone; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; IRR, infusion-related reaction; MET, mesenchymal-epithelial transition; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event. aIncludes all AEs occurring in ≥15% of patients from all cohorts or in the DEX 8 mg cohort.
|
Health Care Utilization
- In the DEX 8 mg cohort (n=38), the median duration of RYBREVANT infusion (including actual infusion time and interruption time) on C1D1 was 4.4 hours (range, 3.9-7.5).6
- By C1D15 and onward, the median duration of RYBREVANT infusion was approximately 2.3 hours for all cohorts.5
- Time and motion data on C1D1 are included in Table: Median Time and Motion Endpoints on C1D1.
Median Time and Motion Endpoints on C1D16
|
|
|
---|
Time in treatment room
| 5.9
| 8.1
|
Time in chair
| 5.9
| 8
|
Active HCP time
| 7.7
| 8.4
|
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; C, cycle; D, day; DEX, dexamethasone; HCP, health care provider. aIncludes the DEX 4 mg, montelukast, and methotrexate cohorts. Note: Patients who aborted infusions due to AEs and those who inadvertently excluded the line flush time from their infusion calculation were excluded.
|
Literature Search
A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 24 January 2025.
1 | Moores SL, Chiu ML, Bushey BS, et al. A novel bispecific antibody targeting EGFR and cMet is effective against EGFR inhibitor-resistant lung tumors. Cancer Res. 2016;76(13):3942-3953. |
2 | Cho BC, Felip E, Hayashi H, et al. MARIPOSA: phase 3 study of first-line amivantamab + lazertinib versus osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Future Oncol. 2022;18(6):639-647. |
3 | Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Subcutaneous methotrexate, oral dexamethasone or oral montelukast for the prevention of infusion related reaction associated with amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, among post-osimertinib treated EGFRm NSCLC; SKIPPirr, a phase 2 study. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2025 January 24]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05663866 NLM Identifier: NCT05663866. |
4 | Lopes G, Spira AI, Han JY, et al. Preventing infusion-related reactions with intravenous amivantamab: primary results from SKIPPirr, a phase 2 study. Oral Presentation presented at: International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC); September 7-10, 2024; San Diego, CA. |
5 | Spira AI, Paz-Ares L, Han JY, et al. Brief report: preventing infusion-related reactions with intravenous amivantamab: results from SKIPPirr, a phase 2 study. [published online ahead of print January 24, 2025]. J Thorac Oncol. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2025.01.018. |
6 | Spira AI, Paz-Ares L, Han JY, et al. Supplement for: Brief report: preventing infusion-related reactions with intravenous amivantamab: results from SKIPPirr, a phase 2 study. [published online ahead of print January 24, 2025]. J Thorac Oncol. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2025.01.018. |