This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

Use of SIMPONI ARIA Without Methotrexate in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Last Updated: 01/08/2025

Summary

  • The company cannot recommend any practices, procedures, or usage that deviate from the approved labeling.
  • A phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of SIMPONI ARIA, with and without MTX, in patients with active RA despite treatment with MTX.1
  • From a real-world evidence study, the utilization of methotrexate was evaluated in RA patients treated with SIMPONI ARIA.2,3

CLINICAL DATA

Controlled Phase 3 Trial - GO-LIVE

Kremer et al (2010)1 assessed the efficacy and safety of SIMPONI ARIA in patients with active RA despite treatment with MTX in a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study. Active RA was defined as ≥4 tender and ≥4 swollen joints, plus at least 2 of the following: 1) C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥1.5 mg/dL or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥28 mm/hour, 2) morning stiffness ≥30 minutes, 3) bone erosions, or 4) rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) positivity. Further, patients had to be treated with MTX for ≥3 months before screening, including treatment at a stable dose (15-25 mg/week) for ≥4 weeks.

Study Design/Methods

  • A total of 643 adult RA patients were randomized to SIMPONI ARIA 2 mg/kg + MTX (n=129), SIMPONI ARIA 2 mg/kg (n=128), SIMPONI ARIA 4 mg/kg + MTX (n=128), SIMPONI ARIA 4 mg/kg (n=129), or intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo + MTX (n=129) every 12 weeks through week 48. IV infusions were administered over a period of 30 minutes (acceptable window for infusion of 25-35 minutes) at weeks 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48.
  • Patients were permitted to continue stable doses of oral corticosteroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Previous but not current anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy was also permitted (limited to 20% of the study population) with appropriate washout (infliximab washout period ≥3 months; etanercept or adalimumab washout period ≥2 months).
  • Patients who had <20% improvement from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts were eligible to enter early escape at week 16 or have a dose regimen adjustment at week 24 in a blinded manner.
  • Patients who completed the week 48 infusion were eligible to continue in an open-label long-term extension with golimumab 50 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for an additional 24 weeks (extension weeks 0-24) and an additional 16 weeks of safety follow-up (extension weeks 24-40).
  • The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving 50% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR50) at week 14.
  • Secondary endpoints included a 20% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) response at week 14, ACR50 response at week 24, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using CRP (DAS28 [CRP]) moderate/good response at week 14, and the change in the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS) score at week 14.

Results

Patient Characteristics
  • At baseline, the groups were well matched regarding demographics and clinical characteristics.
  • The mean ages ranged from 48.4-50.2 years with mean disease duration ranging from 7.4-9.4 years.
  • The mean swollen and tender joint counts ranged from 15.2-16.1 and 26.5-28.2, respectively.
  • Prior to study participation, approximately 5% of patients had received infliximab (n=36), etanercept (n=29), and/or adalimumab (n=36).
Efficacy

Summary of Efficacy Results at Weeks 14, 24, and 481,4
SIMPONI ARIA
SIMPONI ARIA+MTX
PBO + MTX
2 mg/kg
4 mg/kg
Combineda
2 mg/kg
4 mg/kg
Combinedb
Patients randomized
129
128
129
257
129
128
257
Week 14
ACR50
n (%)
17
(13.2%)
16
(12.5%)
25
(19.4%)
41
(16.0%)
28
(21.7%)
27
(21.1%)
55
(21.4%)
P-value
P=0.872
P=0.175
P=0.465
P=0.073
P=0.093
P=0.051
ACR20
n (%)
36
(27.9%)
51
(39.8%)3
62
(48.1%)
113
(44.0%)
71
(55.0%)
66
(51.6%)
137
(53.3%)
P-value
P=0.04
P<0.001
P=0.002
P<0.001
P<0.001
P<0.001
ACR70
n (%)
6
(4.7%)
5
(3.9%)
6
(4.7%)
11
(4.3%)
9
(7.0%)0
7
(5.5%)
16
(6.2%)
P-value
P=0.769
P=0.987
P=0.875
P=0.42
P=0.763
P=0.524
DAS28 moderate or good
n (%)
56
(43.4%)
78
(60.9%)
86
(66.7%)
164
(63.8%)
88
(68.2%)
94
(73.4%)
182
(70.8%)
P-value
P=0.005
P<0.001
P<0.001
P<0.001
P<0.001
P<0.001
DAS28<2.6
n (%)
6
(4.7%)
8
(6.3%)
11
(8.5%)
19
(7.4%)
8
(6.2%)
16
(12.5%)
24
(9.3%)
P-value
P=0.570
P=0.210
P=0.300
P=0.578
P=0.024
P=0.102
SF-36 PCS
Mean (median) change
4.3
(3.4)
4.0
(2.8)
5.1
(3.3)
4.6
(3.0)
6.9
(6.0)
6.8
(6.3)
6.8
(6.1)
P-value
P=0.738
P=0.788
P=0.996
P=0.014
P=0.014
P=0.005
Week 24
ACR20
n (%)
32
(24.8%)
29
(22.7%)
38
(29.5%)
67
(26.1%)
48
(37.2%)
64
(50.0%)
112
(43.6%)
P-value
P=0.687
P=0.406
P=0.787
P=0.032
P<0.001
P<0.001
ACR50
n (%)
12
(9.3%)
11
(8.6%)
15
(11.6%)
26
(10.1%)
24
(18.6%)
32
(25.0%)
56
(21.8%)
P-value
P=0.844
P=0.540
P=0.795
P=0.032
P<0.001
P=0.002
ACR70
n (%)
4
(3.1%)
4
(3.1%)
8
(6.2%)
12
(4.7%)
8
(6.2%)
10
(7.8%)
18
(7.0%)
P-value
P=0.990
P=0.236
P=0.463
P=0.240
P=0.097
P=0.120
DAS28 moderate or good
n (%)
47
(36.4%)
41
(32.0%)
61
(47.3%)
102
(39.7%)
70
(54.3%)
82
(64.1%)
152
(59.1%)
P-value
P=0.458
P=0.080
P=0.535
P=0.004
P<0.001
P<0.001
DAS28<2.6
n (%)
5
(3.9%)
4
(3.1%)
10
(7.8%)
14
(5.4%)
11
(8.5%)
16
(12.5%)
27
(10.5%)
P-value
P=0.745
P=0.185
P=0.500
P=0.126
P=0.012
P=0.026
Week 48
ACR20
No EE/DRAc
% (n)
71.4%
(5/7)
50.0%
(31/62)
51.4%
(37/72)
50.7%
(68/134)
67.0%
(59/88)
70.4%
(69/98)
68.8%
(128/186)
EE and/or DRAd
% (n)
56.5%
(61/108)
40.9%
(18/44)
52.3%
(23/44)
46.6%
(41/88)
25.9%
(7/27)
31.3%
(5/16)
27.9%
(12/43)
ACR50
No EE/DRAc
% (n)
71.4%
(5/7)
24.2%
(15/62)
22.2%
(16/72)
23.1%
(31/134)
36.4%
(32/88)
48.0%
(47/98)
42.5%
(79/186)
EE and/or DRAd
% (n)
28.7%
(31/108)
11.4%
(5/44)
22.7%
(10/44)
17.0%
(15/88)
14.8%
(4/27)
6.3%
(1/16)
11.6%
(5/43)
ACR70
No EE/DRAc
% (n)
28.6%
(2/7)
12.9%
(8/62)
11.1%
(8/72)
11.9%
(16/134)
11.4%
(10/88)
17.3%
(17/98)
14.5%
(27/186)
EE and/or DRAd
% (n)
6.5%
(7/108)
4.5%
(2/44)
6.8%
(3/44)
5.7%
(5/88)
3.7%
(1/27)
6.3%
(1/16)
4.7%
(2/43)
DAS28 Moderate or Good
No EE/DRAc
% (n)
100.0%
(7/7)
67.7%
(42/62)
73.5%
(50/68)
70.8%
(92/130)
82.8%
(72/87)
86.7%
(85/98)
84.9%
(157/185)
DAS28<2.6
No EE/DRAc
% (n)
57.1%
(4/7)
9.7%
(6/62)
14.5%
(10/69)
12.2%
(16/131)
19.5%
(17/87)
21.4%
(21/98)
20.5%
(38/185)
SF-36 PCS
No EE/DRAc
Mean (median) change
9.3
(7.2)
6.8
(7.2)
5.4
(3.0)
6.0
(5.6)
8.7
(8.4)
9.5
(8.8)
9.1
(8.5)
All P-values are vs placebo + MTX.
Abbreviations: ACR20, 20% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria; ACR50, 50% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria; ACR70, 70% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria; CRP, C-reactive protein; DAS28, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints; DRA, dose regimen adjustment; EE, early escape; MTX, methotrexate; PBO, placebo.
aCombined includes patients receiving SIMPONI ARIA 2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg.
bCombined includes patients receiving SIMPONI ARIA 2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg + MTX.
cIncludes patients who did not enter EE at week 16 and did not have a DRA at week 24.
dIncludes patients who entered EE at week 16 and/or had a DRA at week 24.

Safety
  • A summary of the safety results through week 48 is provided in Table: Summary of Safety Results through Week 16 (Placebo-Controlled Phase) and Week 48 (Including Early Escape and Dose Regimen Adjustments).
  • Tuberculosis (TB) was reported in 2 SIMPONI ARIA treated patients (SIMPONI ARIA 4 mg/kg, n=1; SIMPONI ARIA 4 mg/kg + MTX, n=1); both patients tested negative for TB at screening.
  • A total of 3 patients died through week 48: 1 each in the SIMPONI ARIA 2 mg/kg group, SIMPONI ARIA 4 mg/kg group, and the SIMPONI ARIA 4 mg/kg + MTX group. Two additional deaths (1 in the SIMPONI ARIA 2 mg/kg group and 1 in the SIMPONI ARIA 2 mg/kg + MTX group) were reported after week 48.
  • A total of 8 malignancies reported in patients receiving SIMPONI ARIA. One occurred in the SIMPONI ARIA 2 mg/kg group (basal cell carcinoma), 2 occurred in the SIMPONI ARIA 4 mg/kg group (benign lipoma and colon cancer), 1 occurred in the SIMPONI ARIA 2 mg/kg + MTX group (fibrous histiocytoma), and 4 occurred in the SIMPONI ARIA 4 mg/kg + MTX group (benign breast neoplasm, bladder cancer, lung cancer, and ovarian tumor).
  • Among patients for whom appropriate samples were available, a higher proportion of patients receiving SIMPONI ARIA monotherapy developed antibodies to golimumab compared with those receiving SIMPONI ARIA + MTX (9% [17/194] vs 3% [10/299]). Similarly, concomitant use of MTX was associated with a lower incidence of antibodies to golimumab at week 48.

Summary of Safety Results through Week 16 (Placebo-controlled Phase) and Week 48 (Including Early Escape and Dose Regimen Adjustments)1a

PBO + MTX
IV GLM
IV GLM + MTX
All IV GLMb
2 mg/kg
4 mg/kg
Combinedc
2 mg/kg
4 mg/kg
Combinedd
Week 16 (Placebo-controlled Phase)
Patients Treated
129
129
130
259
128
126
254
513
Patients with ≥1 Adverse Event
n (%)
87
(67.4%)
83
(64.3%)
80
(61.5%)
163
(62.9%)
87
(68.0%)
89
(70.6%)
176
(69.3%)
339
(66.1%)
Patients with ≥1 Serious Adverse Event
n (%)
2
(1.6%)
8
(6.2%)
2
(1.5%)
10
(3.9%)
5
(3.9%)
5
(4.0%)
10
(3.9%)
20
(3.9%)
Patients with ≥1 Infection
n (%)
43
(33.3%)
38
(29.5%)
40
(30.8%)
78
(30.1%)
39
(30.5%)
51
(40.5%)
90
(35.4%)
168
(32.7%)
Patients with ≥1 Serious Infection
n (%)
1
(0.8%)
6
(4.7%)
0
(0.0%)
6
(2.3%)
2
(1.6%)
2
(1.6%)
4
(1.6%)
10
(1.9%)
Patients with ≥1 Infusion Reaction
n (%)
7
(5.4%)
8
(6.2%)
3
(2.3%)
11
(4.2%)
6
(4.7%)
3
(2.4%)
9
(3.5%)
20
(3.9%)
Infusions with ≥1 Infusion Reaction
n/Total (%)
7/252
(2.8%)
9/252
(3.6%)
3/257
(1.2%)
12/509
(2.4%)
7/254
(2.8%)
3/251
(1.2%)
10/505
(2.0%)
22/1014
(2.2%)
Week 48 (Including Early Escape and Dose Regimen Adjustments)
Patients Treated
129
128
127
254
182
334
468
626
Patients with ≥1 Adverse Event
n (%)
93
(72.1%)
99
(77.3%)
99
(78.0%)
198
(78.0%)
135
(74.2%)
245
(73.4%)
358
(76.5%)
511
(81.6%)
Patients with ≥1 Serious Adverse Event
n (%)
7
(5.4%)
12
(9.4%)
6
(4.7%)
18
(7.1%)
18
(9.9%)
27
(8.1%)
45
(9.6%)
63
(10.1%)
Patients with ≥1 Infection
n (%)
53
(41.1%)
56
(43.8%)
53
(41.7%)
109
(42.9%)
66
(36.3%)
139
(41.6%)
199
(42.5%)
300
(47.9%)
Patients with ≥1 Serious Infection
n (%)
2
(1.6%)
7
(5.5%)
1
(0.8%)
8
(3.1%)
4
(2.2%)
11
(3.3%)
15
(3.2%)
23
(3.7%)
Patients with ≥1 Infusion Reaction
n (%)
7
(5.4%)
8
(6.3%)
5
(3.9%)
13
(5.1%)
8
(4.4%)
5
(1.5%)
13
(2.8%)
26
(4.2%)
Infusions with ≥1 Infusion Reaction
n/Total (%)
7/357
(2.0%)
10/519
(1.9%)
6/540
(1.1%)
16/1059
(1.5%)
11/606
(1.8%)
6/1045
(0.6%)
17/1651
(1.0%)
33/2710
(1.2%)
Abbreviations: IV, intravenous; GLM, golimumab; MTX, methotrexate; PBO, placebo.
aData through week 48 are presented by actual treatment received, with adverse events being attributed to the treatment received at the time of the event. Therefore, some patients are included in more than 1 column.
bIncludes patients receiving SIMPONI ARIA with or without MTX.
cCombined includes patients receiving SIMPONI ARIA 2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg.
dCombined includes patients receiving SIMPONI ARIA 2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg + MTX.

Real World Evidence

Broadwell et al (2019)2 evaluated MTX utilization among patients with RA treated with SIMPONI ARIA from the AWARE study. AWARE (Comparative and Pragmatic Study of intravenous [IV] Golimumab [SIMPONI ARIA] versus infliximab [REMICADE] in rheumatoid arthritis [RA]) is an on-going, phase 4, prospective, noninterventional, observational, multicenter, real world evidence study of SIMPONI ARIA compared to infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

Study Design/Methods
  • A total of 1270 adult RA patients were enrolled in the AWARE study at the time of treatment initiation with SIMPONI ARIA (n=685) or infliximab (n=585).
  • The primary endpoint of the AWARE study was the proportion of patients who had an infusion reaction during the first 52 weeks of treatment.
  • Treatment decisions, including prescribed dose, dosing frequency, and MTX utilization were made at the discretion of the rheumatologist.  
  • Concomitant MTX use was defined as patients who were administered at least 1 MTX dose on or after the first SIMPONI ARIA infusion.
  • Change in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) from baseline was measured at months 3, 6, and 12.
  • Change from baseline CDAI was based on imputed data using LOCF for missing data and/or treatment failure rule.
Patient Characteristics

Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics2
Patient Characteristics
SIMPONI ARIA + MTX
SIMPONI ARIA
Patients treated, n
420
265
Age, mean (SD), years
61.3 (12.8)
60.3 (14.4)
Female, n (%)
367 (87.4)
215 (81.1)
Caucasian, n (%)
366 (87.1)
233 (87.9)
Biologics bionaïve, n (%)
168 (40.0)
74 (27.9)
Disease duration, mean (SD), years
8.7 (9.4)
10.0 (10.8)
CDAI, mean (SD)
30.8 (15.1)
(n=419)
32.6 (15.4)
(n=263)
Abbreviations: CDAI, clinical disease activity index; MTX, methotrexate.
Efficacy

Mean Changes from Baseline in CDAI Scores among Bionaïve Patients Treated with SIMPONI ARIA with or without Concomitant MTX2
SIMPONI ARIA + MTX
SIMPONI ARIA
Patients treated, n
150
65
CDAI score, mean change from baseline at month 3
-7.39
-7.93
CDAI score, mean change from baseline at month 6
-11.0
-10.36
CDAI score, mean change from baseline at month 12
-11.74
-9.64
Abbreviations: CDAI, clinical disease activity index; MTX, methotrexate.
Safety

Summary of Safety Results through Week 522

SIMPONI ARIA + MTX
SIMPONI ARIA
Patients treated, n
420
265
Patients with ≥1 infusion reactions, % (95% CI)
2.9 (1.48%, 4.94)
5.7 (3.20%, 9.16)
SIMPONI ARIA infusions with preinfusion medication, n (%)
867 (24.1%)
405 (20.2%)
Proportion of patients discontinuing SIMPONI ARIA, n (%)
263 (62.6%)
191 (72.1%)
Patients with ≥1 TEAE, n (%)
233 (55.5%)
146 (55.1%)
Patients with ≥1 infection, n (%)
122 (29.0%)
77 (29.1%)
Patients with ≥1 neoplasm, n (%)
22 (5.2%)
8 (3.0%)
Latent tuberculosis, n (%)
0 (0%)
1 (0.4%)
Abbreviations: MTX, methotrexate; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.

Schwartzman et al (2019)3 analyzed the effect of concomitant methotrexate utilization on the incidence and management of infusion reactions in adult RA patients treated with SIMPONI ARIA or infliximab from a prospective, noninterventional, observational, multicenter, real world evidence, phase 4 AWARE study conducted in the US.

Study Design/Methods

  • A total of 1270 adult RA patients were enrolled in the AWARE study at the time of initiating treatment with SIMPONI ARIA (n=685) or infliximab (n=585).
  • In the AWARE study, the primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an infusion reaction at week 52 in the SIMPONI ARIA group compared to the infliximab group.
    • An infusion reaction was defined as any adverse event (AE) occurring during an infusion or within 1 hour after completion of an infusion.
    • At the planned interim analysis, when 833 patients reached 52 weeks of treatment, the primary endpoint was met (P<0.001).
  • Prior biologic medication use and concomitant MTX use were recorded. Concomitant MTX use was defined as any dose of MTX on or after the baseline infusion of SIMPONI ARIA.
  • The protocol did not restrict or introduce any medical interventions or medications.
  • All treatment decisions including dose and dosing frequency were made at the discretion of the treating rheumatologist and patient visits occurred per usual clinical practice.
  • Imputations were not performed in this analysis of the AWARE data.

Results

Patient Characteristics
  • The baseline demographics were generally comparable between the 2 treatment groups. However, mean age and disease duration was greater in the SIMPONI ARIA treated patients compared to the infliximab treated patients by approximately 2 years. Also, the proportion of patients with ≥3 prior biologic use was approximately 2 fold greater in the SIMPONI ARIA treated patients vs infliximab treated patients.
  • The proportion of patients who received concomitant MTX was similar between the SIMPONI ARIA group (n=420 [61.3%]) and the infliximab group (n=356 [60.9%]).
Safety

Summary of Infusion Reactions at Week 523
SIMPONI ARIA
IV Infliximab
Patients treated, n
685
585
Patients with ≥1 infusion reaction*, %
3.8%
12.7%
Total number of infusions with infusion reaction, n
28
129
Patients with treatment discontinuation due to infusion reactions, %
9.7%
35.1%
Patients with ≥1 serious infusion reaction, n (%)
0 (0%)
2 (0.3%)
Patients with ≥1 severe infusion reaction, n (%)
1 (0.1%)
4 (0.7%)
MTX Use
No MTX Use
MTX Use
No MTX Use
Patients treated, n
420
265
356
229
Patients with ≥1 infusion reaction, %
2.9%
5.7%
11.0%
19.2%
Patients with ≥1 serious infusion reaction, n (%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
1 (0.3%)
1 (0.4%)
Patients with ≥1 severe infusion reaction, n (%)
0 (0%)
1 (0.4%)
2 (0.6%)
2 (0.9%)
Abbreviations: IV, intravenous; MTX, methotrexate.
*Percent difference (95% Confidence interval) 8.9 (6.8, 11.0); the confidence intervals are based on Wald method using inverse probability of treatment weighted propensity score.

Summary of Preinfusion Medications and Medications Used for Infusion Reactions3
SIMPONI ARIA
IV Infliximab
Patients with ≥1 preinfusion medication, n (%)
214 (31.2%)
489 (83.6%)
Infusions with preinfusion medication, n (%)
1272 (22.7%)
3403 (62.8%)
Patients with ≥1 medication for infusion reaction, n (%)
15 (2.2%)
64 (10.9%)
Infusions with medication used for infusion reaction, n/N (%)
15/28 (53.6%)
98/129 (76.0%)
MTX Use
No MTX Use
MTX Use
No MTX Use
Infusions with preinfusion medication, n/N (%)
867/3600 (24.1%)
405/2009 (20.2%)
2198/3450 (63.7%)
1205/1965 (61.3%)
Infusions with medication used for infusion reaction, n/N (%)
7/12 (58.3%)
8/16 (50.0%)
59/76 (77.6%)
39/53 (73.6%)
Abbreviations: IV, intravenous; MTX, methotrexate.

LITERATURE SEARCH

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 26 November 2024.

 

References

1 Kremer J, Ritchlin C, Mendelsohn A, et al. Golimumab, a new human anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody, administered intravenously in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: forty-eight-week efficacy and safety results of a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(4):917-928.  
2 Broadwell A, Schechtman J, Conaway D, et al. United States rheumatology practice-based real-world evidence of methotrexate utilization and response to therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with intravenous golimumab: 52-week data from the AWARE study. Poster presented at: Congress of Clinical Rheumatology; September 26-29; San Diego, CA.  
3 Schwartzman S, Broadwell A, Kivitz A, et al. United States rheumatology practice-based real-world evidence of infusion reactions in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with intravenous golimumab or infliximab: impact of prior biologic exposure and methotrexate utilization. presented at: American College of Rheumatology; November 8-13; Atlanta, GA.  
4 Data on File. Clinical Study Report C0524T12. Janssen Research & Development. EDMS-ERI-81013586. US-SRSM-3645; 2014.