This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

Dosage and Administration - Management of Missed Dose or Reinitiation After SPRAVATO Discontinuation

Last Updated: 03/22/2024

SUMMARY

  • SPRAVATO nasal spray must be self-administered under the direct supervision of a healthcare provider. A treatment session consists of nasal administration of SPRAVATO and post-administration observation under supervision. The nasal spray device delivers a total of 28 mg of esketamine. To prevent loss of medication, do not prime the device before use. Use 2 devices (for a 56 mg dose) or 3 devices (for an 84 mg dose), with a 5 minute rest between use of each device to allow medication to absorb.1
  • Missed Dose: If a patient misses treatment session(s) during the first 4 weeks of treatment, the patient should continue the current dosing schedule.2 For patients who miss treatment session(s) during maintenance treatment and have worsening of depression symptoms, per clinical judgement, consider returning to the previous dosing schedule (e.g., if doses missed during weekly dosing, revert to twice weekly dosing).1
  • Reinitiation: In a post hoc analysis of the open-label, phase 3, SUSTAIN-3 study, patients who relapsed on SPRAVATO conjunctively with an antidepressant (AD) during the SUSTAIN-1 study, after attaining stable response or remission, were reinitiated on flexibly dosed SPRAVATO in the induction phase followed by optimization/maintenance (OP/M) phase. Patients received flexible, twice-weekly dosing of SPRAVATO during the 4-week second induction phase and weekly, every other week, or every 4-week dosing during the variable duration OP/M phase.3
  • An analysis of real-world safety data collected through required reporting from Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) monitoring forms found that patients reinitiating SPRAVATO after gaps in treatment (>60 days) had rates of sedation, dissociation, and increased blood pressure consistent with its established safety profile.4

Clinical data

Post Hoc Analysis of Patients Who Reinitiated SPRAVATO in SUSTAIN-3 After Relapsing While Taking or Discontinuing SPRAVATO in SUSTAIN-1

Castro et al (2023)3 conducted a post hoc analysis of the open-label, phase 3, SUSTAIN-3 study to assess efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with TRD (N=96) who relapsed during the SUSTAIN-15 study, after attaining stable response and remission, and received a second twice-weekly induction of SPRAVATO followed by OP/M treatment.

Results

  • Of the 96 patients (mean [standard deviation (SD)] age, 45.0 [10.59] years; female, 69.8%), 32 had previously relapsed on SPRAVATO+AD (esketamine nasal spray [ESK] plus an oral AD [PR-ESK+AD]) and 64 had previously relapsed on AD+placebo (PBO; PR-AD+PBO) in the maintenance phase of SUSTAIN-1.
  • The median duration of time between relapse and start of the second induction phase was 22.0 days and 16.0 days for the PR-ESK+AD and PR-AD+PBO groups, respectively.
  • By the end of the SUSTAIN-1 optimization phase, a majority of the patients in the
    PR-ESK+AD group (71.9%) were taking 84 mg SPRAVATO, and before relapse, most patients in both groups were dosed weekly (PR-ESK+AD, 66.7%; PR-AD+PBO, 68.4%).
  • In both groups, substantial improvements in depressive symptoms were observed over the second induction phase of SPRAVATO and sustained in the OP/M phase (see Figure: Mean (A) MADRS and (B) PHQ-9 Total Scores (LOCF) During the Reinduction and OP/M Phases of SUSTAIN-3 Among Patients Who Previously Experienced Relapse in SUSTAIN-1).
  • At the end of the second induction phase, 71.9% and 62.5% of patients in the PR-ESK+AD group, and 73.4% and 60.9% of patients in the PR-AD+PBO group, achieved response and remission on the MADRS (see Table: Proportion of Patients in SUSTAIN-3 Who Attained Response or Remission Status Based on the MADRS and PHQ-9 Scores (LOCF)).
  • Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 58.3% and 83.3% of patients in the second induction and OP/M phases, respectively. Overall, SPRAVATO was well tolerated with no new safety signals reported.
    • The most common (≥10%) TEAEs during the second induction phase (N=96) were dissociation (17.7%), dizziness (13.5%), vertigo (13.5%), and dysgeusia (12.5%).
    • The most common (≥15%) TEAEs during the OP/M phase (N=94) were dissociation (27.1%), headache (25.0%), dizziness (21.9%), vertigo (20.8%), somnolence (18.8%), nausea (18.8%), nasopharyngitis (17.7%), anxiety (16.7%), and dysgeusia (15.6%).
    • No serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in the second induction phase; 12.8% (n=12) of patients experienced SAEs during the OP/M phase (the most common SAEs were psychiatric disorders, 3.1%; neoplasms [benign, malignant, and unspecified], 2.1%; and nervous system disorders, 2.1%).
    • No discontinuations due to TEAEs occurred during the second induction period, while 4 occurred during the OP/M phase.

Mean (A) MADRS and (B) PHQ-9 Total Scores (LOCF) During the Reinduction and OP/M Phases of SUSTAIN-3 Among Patients Who Previously Experienced Relapse in SUSTAIN-16

Chart, line chart

Description automatically generated

Abbreviations: IND, induction; LOCF, last observation carried forward; MADRS, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; OP/M, optimization/maintenance; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item.


Proportion of Patients in SUSTAIN-3 Who Attained Response or Remission Status Based on the MADRS and PHQ-9 Scores (LOCF)3
MADRS
PHQ-9
PR-ESK+AD
PR-AD+PBO
PR-ESK+AD
PR-AD+PBO
IND phase end point, n/N (%)
   ≥50% improvement from baselinea
23/32 (71.9)
47/64 (73.4)
15/32 (46.9)
40/63 (63.5)
   Total score ≤12 (MADRS) or
   <5 (PHQ-9)

20/32 (62.5)
39/64 (60.9)
7/32 (21.9)
34/64 (53.1)
OP/M phase week 24, n/N (%)
   ≥50% improvement from baseline
12/32 (37.5)
43/62 (69.4)
10/32 (31.3)
35/61 (57.4)
   Total score ≤12 (MADRS) or
   <5 (PHQ-9)

13/32 (40.6)
36/62 (58.1)
9/32 (28.1)
26/62 (41.9)
OP/M phase week 52, n/N (%)
   ≥50% improvement from baseline
13/32 (40.6)
34/62 (54.8)
10/32 (31.3)
30/61 (49.2)
   Total score ≤12 (MADRS) or
   <5 (PHQ-9)

12/32 (37.5)
26/62 (41.9)
9/32 (28.1)
21/62 (33.9)
Abbreviations: AD, antidepressant; ESK, esketamine nasal spray; IND, induction; LOCF, last observation carried forward; MADRS, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; OP/M, optimization/maintenance phase; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item; PR-AD+PBO, previously relapsed on an oral AD plus placebo after receiving ESK IND; PR-ESK+AD, previously relapsed on ESK plus an oral AD.
aBaseline was defined as before SUSTAIN-3.

Real-World Safety of SPRAVATO Nasal Spray in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression Who Reinitiated SPRAVATO After Initial Treatment

Verbanac et al (2021)4 evaluated the real-world safety profile of SPRAVATO in patients during their first treatment period and during subsequent reinitiation periods.

Methods

  • Safety data (sedation, dissociation, blood pressure) were collected from REMS patient monitoring forms from 5 March 2019 to 5 January 2021 and grouped into 3 sequentially separate treatment periods based on treatment gaps >60 days.
    • Period 1: the first continuous treatment period for patients receiving ≥1 dose of SPRAVATO
    • Period 2: the second continuous treatment period after a first treatment gap of >60 days
    • Period 3: the third continuous treatment period after a second treatment gap of >60 days
  • Rates of AEs were summarized by treatment period and by treatment phase (induction vs maintenance) for each treatment period
    • Induction phase: first 8 SPRAVATO treatment sessions
    • Maintenance phase: ≥9th treatment session

Results

Baseline demographics were similar across all treatment periods (see Table: Baseline Demographics)


Table: Baseline Demographics4
Period 1
N = 9889
Period 2
N = 965
Period 3
N = 123
Total sessions, n
173,407
9,182
676
Sessions/patient, mean (range)
17.5 (1-146)
9.5 (1-96)
5.5 (1-52)
Female, n (%)
5724 (57.9%)
576 (59.7%)
69 (56.1%)
Age, mean (SD)
44.7 (14.80)
45.4 (14.63)
44.9 (13.80)
  • Based on the total number of patients treated, rates of sedation, dissociation, and increased blood pressure generally remained similar across all 3 periods (see Figure: Rates of Reported AEs by Total Patients Treated Per Period).
  • SAEs were reported in 2.6% of patients in period 1, 0.8% of patients in period 2, and 0.8% of patients in period 3. The most common SAEs reported were increased blood pressure, dizziness, nausea, dissociation, and vomiting.

Figure: Rates of Reported AEs by Total Patients Treated Per Period4

A graph of different colored bars

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Figure A: Rates of AEs Reported During Induction Phase by Total Patients Treated4

Figure B: Rates of AEs Reported During Maintenance Phase by Total Patients Treated4

A graph of different colored bars

Description automatically generated

The authors noted that the results for periods 2 and 3 should be interpreted with caution due to the much smaller sample sizes.

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) pertaining to this topic was conducted on 26 February 2024.

References

1 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Summary Review. NDA 211243 - SPRAVATO (esketamine) - Reference ID: 4398871. 2019- [cited 2024 February 26]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2019/211243Orig1s000SumR.pdf.  
2 Core Company Data Sheet. Esketamine. Version 8. Janssen Research & Development, LLC. EDMS-ERI-122750672. 2022.  
3 Castro M, Wilkinson ST, Al Jurdi RK, et al. Efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray in patients with treatmentresistant depression who completed a second induction period: analysis of the ongoing SUSTAIN3 study. CNS Drugs. 2023;37(8):715-723.  
4 Verbanac J, Naumah I, Nash A, et al. Real-world safety of esketamine nasal spray in patients with treatment-resistant depression who reinitiated esketamine after initial treatment. Poster presented at: Neuroscience Education Institute (NEI); November 4-7, 2021; Colorado Springs, CO.  
5 Daly EJ, Trivedi MH, Janik A, et al. Efficacy of esketamine nasal spray plus oral antidepressant treatment for relapse prevention in patients with treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(9):893-903.  
6 Castro M, Petrillo MP, Zaki N, et al. Efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray in patients with treatment-resistant depression who relapsed and completed a second induction period: analysis of the ongoing SUSTAIN-3 study. Poster presented at: Anxiety and Depression Association of America (ADAA) Conference; March 17-20, 2022; Denver, CO.