(esketamine)
This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.
Last Updated: 10/28/2024
As described in the studies below, co-administration of a CYP inducer, CYP3A4 inhibitor, CYP2B6 inhibitor, intranasal corticosteroid, or intranasal decongestant showed no evidence of significant impact on the PK of SPRAVATO.
An open-label (OL), multiple-dose, parallel-group study evaluated the induction potential of repeated SPRAVATO on CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 using midazolam (CYP3A4 substrate) and bupropion (CYP2B6 substrate), respectively. Cohort 1 (n=13) received oral midazolam 6 mg on day 1 and 17 and SPRAVATO 84 mg on day 2, 5, 9, 12, and 16. Cohort 2 received bupropion 150 mg on day 1 and 19 and SPRAVATO 84 mg on day 4, 7, 11, 14, and 18.4
Based on geometric mean ratios (GMRs), repeated dosing of SPRAVATO after midazolam administration resulted in midazolam Cmax, AUC up to the last measurable concentration (AUClast), and total drug exposure across time (AUC∞) being approximately 11%, 18%, and 16% lower, respectively, compared to that seen with midazolam administration alone. Cmax of 1-hydroxymidazolam was unaffected, but AUClast and AUC∞, were reduced by approximately 14%.4
The plasma and urinary PK of bupropion and its metabolite, hydroxybupropion, were not affected by multiple administrations of SPRAVATO.4
An OL, 2-period, fixed sequence study evaluated the effects of oral rifampin, a potent CYP inducer, on the PK of SPRAVATO in healthy White subjects (n=16). Subjects were administered SPRAVATO 56 mg on day 1 of period 1, rifampin 600 mg daily on day -6 to -1 of period 2, and SPRAVATO 56 mg on day 1 of period 2. There was a washout period of 8-10 days between both SPRAVATO doses.4
Based on GMRs, Cmax, AUClast, and AUC∞ of SPRAVATO were 17%, 31% and 28% lower in subjects pretreated with rifampin than in subjects treated with SPRAVATO alone.4
An OL study evaluated the effects of clarithromycin, a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor, on SPRAVATO PK. Subjects (n=18) received clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily on days -3 to day 2 followed by SPRAVATO 84 mg on day 1.4
Administration of clarithromycin before SPRAVATO resulted in geometric mean increases in Cmax, AUClast, and AUC∞ by 11%, 6%, and 4%, respectively, compared to SPRAVATO alone.4
An OL, 2-period, fixed-sequence study evaluated the effect of ticlopidine, a CYP2B6 inhibitor, on the PK of SPRAVATO. Subjects (n=16) received SPRAVATO 56 mg in period 1, ticlopidine 250 mg twice daily from day -9 to 1, and SPRAVATO 56 mg on day 1 in period 2.4
Ticlopidine administration before SPRAVATO resulted in geometric mean increases in Cmax, AUClast, AUC∞ by approximately 2%, 33%, and 29% compared to SPRAVATO administration alone.4
Zannikos et al (2023)3 conducted a single-center, OL PK study to characterize the effects of coadministration of oxymetazoline or mometasone on the PK of SPRAVATO nasal spray in patients with allergic rhinitis or healthy subjects, respectively.
Twenty-two patients with a history of moderate allergic rhinitis were enrolled in cohort 1, a 2-way crossover study, and were exposed to pollen prior to randomization to one of two treatment sequences to trigger symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Both sequences had 2 periods separated by a 5- to 10-day washout interval. Period 1 of one sequence involved administration of SPRAVATO 56 mg. Period 2 of the same sequence involved 2 sprays of oxymetazoline 0.05% solution in each nostril 1 hour before another dose of SPRAVATO 56 mg. This was reversed in the treatment scheme for the other sequence.
Twenty-four healthy subjects were enrolled in cohort 2, a 2-period fixed sequence study, and received SPRAVATO 56 mg on day 1 of period 1, mometasone 200 μg nasal suspension (2 sprays of 50 μg/spray mometasone suspension in each nostril) from day 1 to day 16 of period 2, and SPRAVATO 56 mg on day 16 of period 2, 1 hour after administration of mometasone.
The 90% confidence intervals for the GMRs of Cmax, AUClast, and AUC∞ were contained within the bioequivalence range between 0.80-1.25 for when SPRAVATO was administered after oxymetazoline or mometasone treatment compared with when SPRAVATO was administered alone.
A physiologically based PK modeling (PBPK) analyses indicated that repeated SPRAVATO administration is not expected to influence ethinyl estradiol exposure from combination oral contraceptives.2
A literature search of MEDLINE®
A PBPK simulation model study described the PK of SPRAVATO and drugdrug interactions of SPRAVATO with other drugs. The findings of this simulation model were found to be in concordance with those of the phase 1 PK studies described in this response.5
1 | Summary Review. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Accessed 2024-10-14. Available via: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2019/211243Orig1s000SumR.pdf |
2 | |
3 | |
4 | |
5 |