This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

Individual Items of the MADRS in the SPRAVATO TRANSFORM-2 Trial

Last Updated: 02/03/2025

SUMMARY  

  • TRANSFORM-2 was a phase III, double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) from an ineffective antidepressant (AD) to flexibly dosed SPRAVATO plus a newly initiated AD or to a newly initiated AD (active comparator) plus placebo nasal spray.1
  • The primary endpoint was change from baseline to day 28 in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score.
    • The 10 items of the MADRS included the following symptoms: apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts.2 
  • Data from the trial found that SPRAVATO-treated patients had a greater likelihood of achieving improvement on all symptoms of depression, as measured by the individual MADRS items. Details of the change in individual items of the MADRS are reported below.2 

CLINICAL DATA

TRANSFORM 2

  • A double-blind (DB), randomized, active-controlled phase III study, TRANSFORM-2,evaluated the efficacy and safety of SPRAVATO in addition to an AD for the reduction of depressive symptoms from baseline to day 28. This post-hoc analysis used MADRS data to evaluate symptom changes. The total scores change and proportions of individual item change scores on the MADRS were evaluated at days 15 and 28; analysis of variance was used to test differences on total scores.2 
  • The minimally important difference of the MADRS total score is generally agreed to be 2 points.2-4  The mean reduction in total scores on the MADRS, indicating improvement, was numerically greater at day 15 (−2.0; P=0.189) and statistically significantly greater at day 28 (−4.4; P=0.017) in the SPRAVATO plus AD arm compared with placebo plus AD (see Table: MADRS Total Score and Change From Baseline Score at Days 15 and 28).2 
  • Proportions of those who improved (defined as ≥2 point reduction on a 7-point scale for the MADRS items) were numerically greater in the SPRAVATO plus AD group compared with the placebo plus AD group across all items at both day 15 and day 28 (see Table: MADRS Items From Baseline to Days 15/28 in SPRAVATO Plus AD Versus Placebo Plus).2 

MADRS Total Score and Change from Baseline Score at Days 15 and 282 

Time Point
Absolute Score
Change from Baseline
Treatment Difference
Placebo plus AD
SPRAVATO plus AD
Placebo plus AD
SPRAVATO plus AD
MADRS
n  
Mean (SD)
N
Mean (SD)
Mean (SD)
Mean
(SD)
Mean (SD)
95% CI    
P- value
Baseline
109
37.3 (5.66)
114
37.0 (5.69)
Day 15
102
27.2 (11.37)
107
24.8 (10.06)
-10.0 (11.63)
-12.1
(10.58)
-2.0 (1.54)
-5.06 to 1.00
0.189
Day 28
100
20.6 (12.70)
101
15.5 (10.67)
-17.0 (13.88)
-21.4
(12.32)
-4.4 (1.85)
-8.10 to -0.80
0.017
AD antidepressant, MADRS Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, SE standard error

MADRS Items from Baseline to Days 15/28 in SPRAVATO Plus AD Versus Placebo Plus AD2 
Improved:
Placebo plus AD
Improved:
SPRAVATO plus AD
Odds Ratio*
SPRAVATO/Placebo
Visit
n (%)
n (%)
(95% CI)
Nominal
P-value
Item 1 –
Reported Sadness
Day 15
Day 28
37 (36.3%)
60 (60.0%)
50 (46.7%)
75 (74.3%)
1.844
(1.014, 3.354)
0.045
Item 2-
Apparent Sadness
Day 15
Day 28
49 (48.0%)
61 (61.0%)
55 (51.4%)
77 (76.2%)
2.007
(1.096, 3.674)
0.024
Item 3-
Inner tension
Day 15
Day 28
30 (29.4%)
48 (48.0%)
38 (35.5%)
65 (64.4%)
1.891
(1.080, 3.313)
0.026
Item 4-
Reduced Sleep
Day 15
Day 28
25 (24.5%)
44 (44.0%)
36 (33.6%)
57 (56.4%)
1.579
(0.908, 2.743)
0.106
Item 5-
Reduced Appetite
Day 15
Day 28
26 (25.5%)
49 (49.0%)
45 (42.1%)
58 (57.4%)
1.386
(0.799, 2.404)
0.246
Item 6-
Concentration Difficulties
Day 15
Day 28
31 (30.4%)
56 (56.0%)
41 (38.3%)
72 (71.3%)
1.880
(1.054, 3.354)
0.033
Item 7-
Lassitude
Day 15
Day 28
29 (28.4%)
59 (59.0%)
39 (36.4%)
70 (69.3%)
1.544
(0.866, 2.754)
0.141
Item 8-
Inability to Feel
Day 15
Day 28
27 (26.5%)
53 (53.0%)
34 (31.8%)
72 (71.3%)
2.099
(1.180, 3.735)
0.012
Item 9-
Pessimistic Thoughts
Day 15
Day 28
38 (37.3%)
55 (55.0%)
43 (40.2%)
65(64.4%)
1.445
(0.825, 2.531)
0.197
Item 10-
Suicidal Thoughts
Day 15
Day 28
17 (16.7%)
27 (27.0%)
24 (22.4%)
35 (34.7%)
1.354
(0.745, 2.459)
0.320
* The odds ratio represents the likelihood of improving over the course of the study and includes both day 15 and day 28 data. An odds ratio >1 favors SPRAVATO over placebo. AD antidepressant, CI confidence interval

References

1 Popova V, Daly EJ, Trivedi M, et al. Efficacy and safety of flexibly dosed esketamine nasal spray combined with a newly initiated oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized double-blind active-controlled study. Am J Psychiatry. 2019;176(6):428-438.  
2 Floden L, Hudgens S, Jamieson C, et al. Evaluation of individual items of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) and montgomery-asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) in adults with treatment-resistant depression treated with esketamine nasal spray combined with a new oral antidepressant. CNS Drugs. 2022;36(6):649-658.  
3 Montgomery SA, Möller HJ. Is the significant superiority of escitalopram compared with other antidepressants clinically relevant? Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009;24(3):111-118.  
4 Montgomery S, Nielsen R, Poulsen L, et al. A randomised, double-blind study in adults with major depressive disorder with an inadequate response to a single course of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor treatment switched to vortioxetine or agomelatine. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2014;29(5):470-482.