This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

STELARA - STARDUST Trial

Last Updated: 01/02/2025

Summary

  • The company cannot recommend any practices, procedures, or usage that deviate from the approved labeling.
  • STARDUST is a phase 3b, multicenter, randomized study in adult patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD) comparing a treat-to-target (T2T) maintenance strategy based on dose adjustment of STELARA at week 16 using endoscopy vs a standard-of-care (SoC) approach. The study consisted of an 8-week STELARA intravenous (IV) induction period followed by a STELARA subcutaneous (SC) maintenance period through week 48. From week 48, patients continued STELARA SC treatment in the long-term extension (LTE) up to week 104.1-3
  • Key efficacy (including endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, changes in intestinal ultrasound [IUS] parameters, mucosal healing, clinical response, clinical remission, corticosteroid-free remission, changes in biomarkers) and safety as well as subgroup analyses through week 48 are reported below.1-4
  • Results from the LTE, up to week 104, including the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures are also summarized below.5-8

CLINICAL DATA

Phase 3b Study: STARDUST Trial

Danese et al (2020, 2022)1-3 reported efficacy and safety results from an open-label, phase 3b, multicenter, randomized study in adult patients with moderately to severely active CD comparing a T2T maintenance strategy based on dose adjustment of STELARA at week 16 using endoscopy (followed by clinical and biomarker directed dose escalation) vs a SoC approach.

Study Design/Methods

STARDUST Study Design1-3

Abbreviations: CD, Crohn’s disease; CDAI, Crohn’s Disease Activity Index; CRP, C-reactive protein; EU, European Union; FCal, fecal calprotectin; IL, interleukin; IV, intravenous; LTE, long-term extension; q8w, every 8 weeks; q12w, every 12 weeks; R, randomization; SC, subcutaneous; SES-CD, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease; SmPC, Summary of Product Characteristics; SoC, standard of care; T2T, treat-to-target; UST, ustekinumab.

  • In the T2T group, beginning at week 16, the STELARA dosing frequency could be increased (eg, every 12 weeks [q12w] increased to every 8 weeks [q8w] and q8w increased to every 4 weeks [q4w]) for patients who did not achieve a Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of <220 with a ≥70 point improvement from baseline and fecal calprotectin (FCal) levels ≤250 μg/g or C-reactive protein (CRP) levels ≤10 mg/L. Patients who did not achieve treatment targets despite receiving STELARA q4w were discontinued from the study at least 4 weeks after the dose escalation.
  • In the SoC group, patients received the STELARA maintenance dose (90 mg SC q12w) based on the European Union Summary of Product Characteristics (EU SmPC) where the recommended dosing for patients with adequate response to induction is q12w. At week 16, patients with inadequate response could receive another dose of STELARA 90 mg SC. According to the EU SmPC, patients who lost response during q12w dosing could be escalated to treatment q8w.
  • For the week 48 analysis, nonresponder imputation (NRI) and last observation carried forward (LOCF) were used for missing dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. LOCF was also a preplanned sensitivity analysis for the primary endpoint.

Results

Patient Characteristics
  • The randomized population included a total of 440 patients (n=219, T2T group; n=221, SoC group).3
  • In the T2T and SoC groups, the median age was 36.0 and 34.0 years and 52% and 50% of patients were female, respectively.3
  • In the T2T and SoC groups, 39% and 38% of patients were biologic-naïve and 61% and 62% had received ≥1 biologic therapy, respectively.3
Efficacy at Week 48

Endoscopic, Clinical, and Biomarker Outcomes at Week 483,9

NRI Analysisa,b
LOCF Analysisb
T2T
(n=219)

SoC
(n=221)

T2T
(n=219)

SoC
(n=221)

Endoscopic response, %c (primary endpoint)
38
30
40
31
Endoscopic remission, %c
11
15
12
15
Mucosal healing, %d
14
17
15
18
Corticosteroid-free endoscopic response, %e
33.8
28.5
36.1
29.4
Clinical response, %f
68
78
89
90
Clinical remission, %f
62
70
77
78
CDAI-70 point response, %f
69
78
92.2
90.5
Corticosteroid-free clinical remission, %g
57
63
70.8
69.7
Corticosteroid-free clinical remission among those receiving corticosteroids at baseline, n/N (%)
26/59
(44)

23/51
(45)

28/59 (47.5)
24/51 (47.1)
Corticosteroid-free clinical remission among patients in clinical remission (post hoc analysis), n/N (%)
124/135 (92)
140/154 (91)
155/169 (91.7)
154/173 (89.0)
FCal normalization, n/N (%)h
51/159 (32)
49/142 (35)
159j (44)
142j (42)
CRP normalization, n/N (%)i
44/155 (28)
53/152 (35)
155j (34)
152j (36)
Complete biomarker response, n/N (%)k
45/193
(23)

47/182
(26)

57/193 (29.5)
55/182 (30.2)
Abbreviations: CDAI, Crohn’s Disease Activity Index; CDAI-70 point response, CDAI improvement of ≥70 points; CMH, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel; CRP, C-reactive protein; FCal, fecal calprotectin; LOCF, last observation carried forward; NRI, nonresponder imputation; SESCD, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease; SoC, standard of care; T2T, treat to target.
aPatients with missing data were analyzed as nonresponders.
bP-values were based on the CMH test with a 2-sided alpha level of 0.05, and stratified by baseline, SES-CD score (≤16, >16) and prior exposure to biologics (0 or 1). All P-values are nominal (except for endoscopic response by NRI analysis [P=0.087]).
c
Endoscopic response (primary endpoint) was defined as a ≥50% decrease in SES-CD score from baseline (based on central reading), and endoscopic remission was defined as an SES-CD score ≤2.
dMucosal healing was defined as the complete absence of mucosal ulcerations in any ileocolonic segment.
eCorticosteroid-free endoscopic response was defined as a ≥50% decrease in SES-CD score from baseline and not taking any steroids for ≥30 days prior to the endpoint.
fClinical response was defined as a CDAI total score of <150 points or a decrease of ≥100 points from baseline; clinical remission, as a CDAI total score <150 points; and CDAI-70 point response, as an improvement from baseline of ≥70 points in CDAI total score.
gCorticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 48 was defined as a CDAI score <150 and no administration of any corticosteroids for at least 30 days before week 48.
hFCal normalization was defined as FCal ≤250 µg/g. Patients with normalized FCal at baseline were excluded.
iCRP normalization was defined as CRP ≤3 mg/L. Patients with normalized CRP at baseline were excluded.
jRepresents total number of patients with FCal or CRP normalization.
k
Complete biomarker response was defined as normalization of both CRP (≤3 mg/L) and FCal (≤250 µg/g); patients with normalized CRP and FCal at baseline as well as patients with missing CRP and FCal at baseline were excluded.


Changes from Baseline in SES-CD Score, CDAI Score, FCal Levels, and CRP Levels at Week 482,3,9
T2Ta
SoCa
Mean Baseline Valueb
Mean Change from Baseline through Week 48
(95% CI)c

Mean Baseline Valueb
Mean Change from Baseline through Week 48
(95% CI)c

SES-CD scored
n=219
13.5

n=219
-5.0
(-6.0 to -4.0)

n=221
12.7

n=221
-4.1
(-4.9 to -3.3)

CDAI score
n=218
287.2

n=219
-187.9
(-198.7 to -177.1)

n=221
287.2

n=221
-187.1
(-199.4 to -174.8)

FCal, μg/g
n=197
1952.7

n=197
-1191.9
(-1674.3 to -709.6)

n=189
1658.8

n=189
-744.4
(-1115.9 to -372.8)

CRP, mg/L
n=219
16.405

n=219
-7.831
(-10.844 to -4.818)

n=219
15.838

n=219
-7.909
(-10.867 to -4.950)

Abbreviations: ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; CDAI, Crohn’s Disease Activity Index; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; FCal, fecal calprotectin; SESCD, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease; SoC, standard of care; T2T, treat to target.
aP-values were based on changes vs baseline using ANCOVA, with baseline value and stratification factors (SES-CD score [≤16, >16] and prior exposure to biologics [0 or 1] as a covariate). All P-values are nominal.
bBaseline values for patients with ≥1 postbaseline assessment.
cLast value carried forward approach was used for patients who had missing data at the week 48 time point.
dSES-CD score range, 0-60.

Subgroup Analysis Based on Baseline Demographics
  • Subgroups of patients were evaluated based on baseline demographics.3
  • For each subgroup, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of T2T vs SoC were provided based on the logistic regression model that included the treatment group and stratification factors (prior exposure to biologics [none or 1] and SES-CD score [≤16, >16] at baseline) as independent variables.3
  • At week 48, among patients included in the subgroup analysis (T2T, n=219; SoC, n=221), patients in the T2T group were more likely to achieve endoscopic response vs patients in the SoC group if patients, at baseline, had3:
    • Longer disease duration (>median [79.1 months]; OR, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.17-3.94]; P=0.013)
    • Clinically moderate disease (CDAI ≤300; OR, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.04-2.80]; P=0.034)
    • Normal FCal (≤250 μg/g; OR, 3.03 [95% CI, 1.22-7.56]; P=0.017)
    • Endoscopically more active CD (SES-CD ≥4 for ileal or ≥6 for colonic and/or ileocolonic disease; OR, 1.80; [95% CI, 1.11-2.94]; P=0.018)
    • History or presence of strictures/fistula or occurrence of an intra-abdominal abscess, hospitalization, or surgery for CD at baseline (history of ongoing events, OR, 2.31; [95% CI, 1.06-5.01]; P=0.034; and ongoing events, OR, 3.46; [95% CI,
      1.07-11.19]; P=0.039).
Safety at Week 48
  • Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were experienced by 188 (86%) patients in the T2T group and 179 (81%) patients in the SoC group.3
  • For summary of safety events, see Table: TEAEs through Week 48.

TEAEs through Week 483
AEs, n (%)
T2T
(n=219)

SoC
(n=221)

Any AE
188 (86)
179 (81)
AE occurring in ≥5% of patients
   Nasopharyngitis
29 (13)
29 (13)
   CD
19 (9)
28 (13)
   Headache
24 (11)
21 (10)
   Pyrexia
26 (12)
19 (9)
   Arthralgia
24 (11)
19 (9)
   Abdominal pain
23 (11)
19 (9)
   Diarrhea
11 (5)
14 (6)
   Nausea
12 (5)
12 (5)
   Influenza
12 (5)
11 (5)
   Anemia
9 (4)
11 (5)
   Back pain
8 (4)
12 (5)
Infections and infestations
101 (46)
95 (43)
Any serious AEs
26 (12)
29 (13)
   Infections and infestations
3 (1)
12 (5)
   Deathsa
2 (1)
0 (0)
   Neoplasms (benign, malignant, and unspecified)
0
2 (1)
AE leading to discontinuation
11 (5)
20 (9)
AE associated with infusion
4 (2)
5 (2)
Injection site reactions
2 (1)
2 (1)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CD, Crohn’s disease; SoC, standard of care; T2T, treat to target; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.
a
Causes of death were unknown (relationship to study drug not reported) and cardiovascular (unconfirmed by autopsy; unrelated to study drug according to investigator’s judgment).

  • One patient in the T2T group reported basal cell carcinoma (not considered a serious adverse event [AE]) and 2 patients in the SoC group reported metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma and invasive ductal breast carcinoma (both considered serious AEs). No patient developed lymphoma.3
  • Two patients in the T2T group and 1 in the SoC group reported herpes zoster infections and one patient each in the SoC group reported disseminated cutaneous herpes zoster and cytomegalovirus syndrome. No patient developed tuberculosis.3
  • Antibodies to ustekinumab (UST) through week 48 were detected in 9 (4%) patients in the T2T group (6 patients had neutralizing antibodies) and in 17 (8%) patients in the SoC group (12 patients had neutralizing antibodies).3

Kucharzik et al (2023)4 reported results from a substudy assessing changes in IUS parameters, including the transmural response to STELARA therapy.

Study Design/Methods

  • Key IUS endpoints were assessed at weeks 0, 4, 8, 16, and 48 or upon early termination10:
    • Segmental IUS response was defined as a reduction of ≥25% in bowel wall thickness (BWT) of the target bowel segment.
    • Transmural remission was defined as normalization of all IUS parameters in the target bowel segment.
    • Segmental BWT: The mean of 4 measurements (2 in cross-section and 2 in longitudinal) of the most affected (ie, most inflamed) part of each segment. BWT was considered pathological if thickness was >2.0 mm in the terminal ileum and >3.0 mm in the colon.
    • Blood flow: Color Doppler signal: 0, no signal; 1, minimal pixels, scant; 2, increased signal limited to the wall; 3, signal is significant in the wall and mesentery. Normalization of color Doppler signal was defined as ≤1.
    • Bowel wall stratification: 0, normal/preserved echo-stratification; 1, uncertain presence of echo-stratification; or 2, focal disruption (<3 cm); 3, extensive disruption (≥3 cm). Normalization of bowel wall stratification was defined as normal/preserved echo-stratification.
    • Mesenteric inflammatory fat (i-Fat): 0, absent, no evidence of proliferative, mesenteric i-Fat; 1, uncertain (increased fat is possible - either the quality or the views are insufficient to determine the contribution); or 2, present. Normalization of mesenteric i-Fat was defined as absence of mesenteric i-Fat.
  • For all IUS parameters, the most affected bowel segment at baseline was used.
  • Obese patients or patients exhibiting other characteristics precluding IUS visualization of the affected bowel segment or with normal BWT (≤2.0 mm for the terminal ileum; ≤3.0 mm for the colon) in all segments at week 0 were excluded.

Results


IUS Response and Transmural Remission Over Time at Week 48 (Overall and by Bowel Segment and Biological Treatment History)4,10,a
Outcome, %
Week 4
Week 8
Week 16
Week 48
IUS Responseb
Overall
25.5; n=55
26.6; n=64
35.8; n=67
46.3; n=54
   By most affected bowel segment
      Terminal ileum
28.9; n=38
21.4; n=42
32.6; n=43
39.5; n=38
      Colon
17.6; n=17
36.4; n=22
41.7; n=24
62.5; n=16
   By biologic treatment history
      Biologic-naïve
25.0; n=24
28.0; n=25
29.6; n=27
59.1; n=22
      Biologic-exposed
25.8; n=31
25.6; n=39
40.0; n=40
37.5; n=32
Transmural Remissionc
Overall
1.8; n=55
6.3; n=64
11.9; n=67
24.1; n=54
   By most affected bowel segment
      Terminal ileum
2.6; n=38
2.4; n=42
4.7; n=43
13.2; n=38
      Colon
0.0; n=17
13.6; n=22
25.0; n=24
50.0; n=16
   By biologic treatment history
      Biologic-naïve
0.0; n=24
4.0; n=25
18.5; n=27
31.8; n=22
      Biologic-exposed
3.2; n=31
7.7; n=39
7.5; n=40
18.8; n=32
Abbreviations: BWT, bowel wall thickness; IUS, intestinal ultrasound.aOnly patients with nonmissing baseline value and ≥1 nonmissing postbaseline value during the main treatment period are included in the analysis.
bIUS response was defined as a ≥25% reduction from baseline in BWT.
cTransmural remission was defined as normalization of BWT, blood flow (color Doppler signal), bowel wall
echo-stratification, and inflammatory mesenteric fat. The most affected (most thickened) bowel segment at baseline was used for IUS response/remission evaluation in the follow-up scans. If 3 out of the 4 IUS parameters were normalized and the 4th was ‘not assessed/not assessable’, transmural remission was considered ‘Yes’.


Mean Percentage Changes in BWT from Baseline to Week 48 (Overall and by Bowel Segment and Biological Treatment History)4,10,a
Mean Percentage Change in BWT (mm)
Week 4
Week 8
Week 16
Week 48
Overall
-9.55
-11.89
-16.12
-25.16
   N
55
64
67
54
   P-valueb
<0.01
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
By most affected bowel segment
   Terminal ileum
-10.69
-8.62
-13.36
-21.26
      N
38
42
43
38
      P-valueb
<0.01
<0.05
<0.001
<0.001
   Colon
-7.01
-18.14
-21.08
-34.43
      N
17
22
24
16
      P-valueb
NS
<0.05
<0.01
<0.01
By biologic treatment history
   Biologic-naïve
-11.05
-14.84
-17.06
-33.42
      N
24
25
27
22
      P-valueb
<0.05
<0.05
<0.01
<0.001
   Biologic-exposed
-8.40
-10.00
-15.49
-19.49
      N
31
39
40
32
      P-valueb
-
<0.05
<0.001
<0.001
Abbreviations: BWT, bowel wall thickness; NS, not significant.
aOnly patients with nonmissing baseline value and ≥1 nonmissing postbaseline value during the main treatment period are included in the analysis.
bP-values are based on the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

  • According to the observed analysis, from baseline through week 48, the overall proportion of patients with normalized BWT, blood flow, bowel wall stratification (BWS), and mesenteric i-Fat increased progressively from 0% to 25.9%, 37.3% to 72.5%, 36.8% to 64.2%, and 25.0% to 55.6%, respectively.10
    • At week 48, normalization of IUS parameters was observed in the colon vs terminal ileum for BWT (50.0% vs 15.8%), blood flow (85.7% vs 67.6%), BWS (66.7% vs 63.2%), and mesenteric i-Fat (68.8% vs 50.0%).
    • At week 48, normalization of IUS parameters was observed in the biologic-naïve vs biologic-exposed patients for BWT (31.8% vs 21.9%), blood flow (70.0% vs 74.2%), BWS (76.2% vs 56.3%), and mesenteric i-Fat (63.6% vs 50.0%).

Long-Term Extension

Peyrin-Biroulet et al (2021, 2022, 2023)5-8 evaluated the efficacy and safety of STELARA through week 104 of the STARDUST LTE.

Study Design/Methods

  • From week 48 onwards, eligible patients in the T2T and SoC groups continued to receive STELARA SC up to week 104 with further protocol-guided dose adjustments.
  • STELARA dose de-escalation was implemented starting at week 48 for patients with endoscopic remission at week 48 and corticosteroid-free clinical remission for ≥16 weeks:
    • Those receiving STELARA q8w were de-escalated to q12w.
    • Those receiving STELARA q4w were de-escalated to q8w and further de-escalated to q12w in patients with corticosteroid-free clinical remission and biomarker remission (CRP ≤10 mg/L and FCal ≤250 µg/g) at 2 consecutive visits 8 weeks apart.
  • Results are presented for the NRI analysis only for patients entering the LTE.
  • Efficacy of the T2T approach in modifying disease course with STELARA was evaluated by analyzing time to disease progression events up to week 104.
  • Disease progression events included combined bowel damage events (defined as the development of new strictures/fistulae or the occurrence of an intra-abdominal abscess) or CD-related hospitalizations or surgeries based on the AE analysis.
  • Time to first bowel damage event, CD-related surgery, CD-related hospitalization, and combined CD-related surgery and hospitalization were analyzed.
  • HRQoL outcomes and the effect of STELARA on work productivity and activity impairment for the T2T and SoC groups were assessed at week 104. Changes from baseline were assessed using the following measures:
    • Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)
    • European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)
    • Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) tools
    • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety and Depression subscales (HADS-A and HADS-D, respectively)
    • Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire
    • Time lost from work, percentage of patients with an IBDQ response (≥16point improvement from baseline) and remission (IBDQ score ≥170) at week 104

Results

Patient Characteristics
  • Among the 440 who were randomized at week 16, 323 entered LTE, of whom 20.1% discontinued before week 104.
    • Of the 147 patients in the T2T group and 176 patients in the SoC group, 119 (81.0%) and 139 (79.0%) patients, respectively, completed 104 weeks of study.
Endoscopic, Clinical, and Biomarker Outcomes

Endoscopic and Clinical Outcomes through Week 104 (NRI)5,11,a

All Randomized Patients
Patients Entering LTE
T2T
(n=219)

SoC
(n=221)

T2T
(n=147)

SoC
(n=176)

Endoscopic response, n (%) (primary endpoint)b
58 (26.5)
69 (31.2)
58 (39.5)
69 (39.2)
Endoscopic remission, n (%)b
26 (11.9)
21 (9.5)
26 (17.7)
21 (11.9)
Corticosteroid-free endoscopic response,c n (%)
-
-
54 (36.7)
62 (35.2)
Corticosteroid-free endoscopic response among those receiving corticosteroids at baseline,c n/N (%)
-
-
10/42 (23.8)
13/39 (33.3)
Clinical response, n (%)d
109 (49.8)
120 (54.3)
109 (74.1)
120 (68.2)
Clinical remission, n (%)d
105 (47.9)
116 (52.5)
105 (71.4)
116 (65.9)
Corticosteroid-free clinical remission,e n (%)
-
-
97 (66.0)
109 (61.9)
Corticosteroid-free clinical remission among those receiving corticosteroids at baseline,e n/N (%)
-
-
22/42 (52.4)
21/39 (53.8)
Abbreviations: CDAI, Crohn’s Disease Activity Index; LTE, long-term extension; NRI, nonresponder imputation; SESCD, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease; SoC, standard of care; T2T, treat to target.
aPatients with missing data were analyzed as nonresponders.
bEndoscopic response (primary endpoint) was defined as a ≥50% decrease in SES-CD score from baseline (based on central reading), and endoscopic remission was defined as an SES-CD score ≤2.
cCorticosteroid-free endoscopic response was defined as a ≥50% decrease in SES-CD score from baseline and not taking any steroids for ≥30 days prior to the scheduled visit.
d
Clinical response was defined as a CDAI total score of <150 points or a decrease of ≥100 points from baseline, and clinical remission, as a CDAI total score <150 points.
eCorticosteroid-free clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score <150 and no administration of any corticosteroids for at least 30 days prior to the scheduled visit.


Clinical, Endoscopic, and Biomarker Outcomes through Week 104 for Patients Entering LTE (as Observed)11
n/N (%)
T2T
(n=147)

SoC
(n=176)

Clinical responsea
109/112 (97.3)
120/127 (94.5)
Clinical remissiona
105/112 (93.8)
116/127 (91.3)
Endoscopic responseb
58/101 (57.4)
69/121 (57.0)
Endoscopic remissionb
26/101 (25.7)
21/121 (17.4)
CRP normalizationc
40/74 (54.1)
43/88 (48.9)
FCal normalizationd
33/65 (50.8)
43/71 (60.6)
Complete biomarker responsee
28/76 (36.8)
37/85 (43.5)
CRP ≥50% improvement
51/74 (68.9)
61/88 (69.3)
FCal ≥50% improvement
46/65 (70.8)
52/71 (73.2)
Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; FCal, fecal calprotectin; LTE, long-term extension; SoC, standard of care; T2T, treat to target.
aClinical response was defined as a CDAI total score of <150 points or a decrease of ≥100 points from baseline, and clinical remission, as a CDAI total score <150 points.
bEndoscopic response (primary endpoint) was defined as a ≥50% decrease in SES-CD score from baseline (based on central reading), and endoscopic remission was defined as an SES-CD score ≤2.
cCRP normalization was defined as CRP ≤3 mg/L.
dFCal normalization was defined as FCal ≤250 µg/g.
eComplete biomarker response was defined as normalization of both CRP (≤3 mg/L) and FCal (≤250 µg/g).

Subgroup Analysis Based on Prior Biologic Exposure

Endoscopic, Clinical, and Biomarker Outcomes at Week 104 in Patients Entering LTE Based on Prior Biologic Exposure (NRI)5,a
Biologic-Naïve
Biologic-Experienced
T2T
(n=62)

SoC
(n=66)

T2T
(n=85)

SoC
(n=110)

Endoscopic response,b n (%)
27 (43.5)
32 (48.5)
31 (36.5)
37 (33.6)
Endoscopic remission,b n (%)
15 (24.2)
11 (16.7)
11 (12.9)
10 (9.1)
Clinical response,c n (%)
49 (79.0)
46 (69.7)
60 (70.6)
74 (67.3)
Clinical remission,c n (%)
47 (75.8)
44 (66.7)
58 (68.2)
72 (65.5)
FCal normalization,d n/N (%)
21/46 (45.7)
15/41 (36.6)
12/59 (20.3)
28/69 (40.6)
FCal ≥50% improvement, n/N (%)
25/46 (54.3)
20/41 (48.8)
21/59 (35.6)
32/69 (46.4)
CRP normalization,e n/N (%)
23/46 (50.0)
15/43 (34.9)
17/57 (29.8)
28/75 (37.3)
CRP ≥50% improvement, n/N (%)
23/46 (50.0)
19/43 (44.2)
28/57 (49.1)
42/75 (56.0)
Complete biomarker response,f n/N
(%)

17/52 (32.7)
16/56 (28.6)
11/72 (15.3)
21/87 (24.1)
Abbreviations: CDAI, Crohn’s Disease Activity Index; CRP, C-reactive protein; FCal, fecal calprotectin; LTE, long-term extension; NRI, nonresponder imputation; SES-CD, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease; SoC, standard of care; T2T, treat to target.
aPatients with missing data were analyzed as nonresponders.
bEndoscopic response (primary endpoint) was defined as a ≥50% decrease in SES-CD score from baseline (based on central reading), and endoscopic remission was defined as an SES-CD score ≤2.
cClinical response was defined as a CDAI total score of <150 points or a decrease of ≥100 points from baseline, and clinical remission, as a CDAI total score <150 points.
d
FCal normalization was defined as FCal ≤250 µg/g. Patients with normalized FCal at baseline were excluded.
eCRP normalization was defined as CRP ≤3 mg/L. Patients with normalized CRP at baseline were excluded.
f
Complete biomarker response was defined as normalization of both CRP (≤3 mg/L) and FCal (≤250 µg/g); patients with normalized CRP and FCal at baseline as well as patients with missing CRP and FCal at baseline were excluded.

Dose Distribution and Dose De-escalation
  • For dose distribution and dose de-escalation in patients through week 104, see Table: Dose Distribution and De-escalation in Patients through Week 104.
  • Of 62 patients who de-escalated their dose at least once, 7 (11.3%) patients escalated their dose after de-escalation and 3 patients were de-escalated after CD-related surgery.
  • From week 48 through week 104, the overall median duration of corticosteroid-free clinical remission and biomarker remission after the first dose de-escalation was 24.00 weeks (95% CI, 12.14-35.29) and 24.00 weeks (95% CI, 14.57-32.86) in the T2T and SoC groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.028; 95% CI, 0.520-2.031).
  • Among patients who completed LTE and remained on the same dose, endoscopic response and remission were achieved in ~50% and ~20% of patients, respectively, and clinical response and remission rates were >90% and >80%, respectively. Less than 10 patients remained on STELARA q4w dosing throughout the LTE period.

Dose Distribution and De-escalation in Patients through Week 1045
T2T
(n=147)

SoC
(n=176)

Dose distribution at week 104
   q12w dosing, %
49.6
50.4
   q8w dosing, %
37.0
41.0
   q4w dosing, %
13.4
8.6
Patients with no dose adjustments,a %
65.5
61.2
Dose de-escalation, n/N (%)
29/145 (20.0)
33/170 (19.4)
Abbreviations: q4w, every 4 weeks; q8w, every 8 weeks; q12w, every 12 weeks; SoC, standard of care; T2T, treat to target.
aPatients who received ≥1 dose after week 48.

Disease Progression Events

Time to Disease Progression Event through Week 48 and Week 104 from Randomization6
From Randomization through Week 48
From Randomization through Week 104
Patients with Events, All Randomized Patientsa,b,c (n=440)
Patients with Events, Patients Entering LTEb,c,d (n=323)
T2T
(n=219)

SoC
(n=221)

HR
(95% CI)e

T2T
(n=147)

SoC
(n=176)

HR
(95% CI)e

CD-related surgeries
4 (1.8)
8 (3.6)
0.444
(0.129-1.528)

4 (2.7)
7 (4.0)
0.655
(0.192-2.240)

CD-related hospitalizations
8 (3.7)
16 (7.2)
0.516
(0.221-1.207)

3 (2.0)
10 (5.7)
0.341
(0.094-1.240)

Combined CDrelated surgeries and hospitalizations
10 (4.6)
19 (8.6)
0.507
(0.234-1.102)

6 (4.1)
14 (8.0)
0.475
(0.182-1.238)

Bowel damage eventsf
9 (4.1)
16 (7.2)
0.507
(0.221-1.165)

6 (4.1)
13 (7.4)
0.534
(0.203-1.406)

Disease progression eventsg
16 (7.3)
25 (11.3)
0.599
(0.317-1.134)

9 (6.1)
20 (11.4)
0.502
(0.228-1.103)

Abbreviations: CD, Crohn’s disease; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; LTE, long-term extension;
SES-CD, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease; SoC, standard of care; T2T, treat to target.
aIncludes all patients that were randomized to either T2T or SoC at week 16.
bThe remaining patients reported no bowel damage events.
cEvents occurring before randomization at week 16 were not considered.
dIncludes all patients who entered into the long-term period from week 48 to week 104.
eHR is from a stratified proportional hazard model with a single factor of treatment group and stratified by baseline SES-CD score (≤16, >16) and prior exposure to biologics (none or 1). HR <1 favors T2T therapy. fIncludes new strictures/fistulae or the occurrence of an intra-abdominal abscess.
gIncludes disease progression events that are represented by combined bowel damage events (defined as the development of new strictures/fistulas or the occurrence of an intra-abdominal abscess) or CD-related hospitalizations or surgeries based on the adverse event analysis.

Pharmacokinetics and Immunogenicity
  • In patients who entered LTE, the median UST concentrations at week 104 were similar between the T2T (2.28 μg/mL) and SoC (2.20 μg/mL) groups.
  • The incidence of antibodies to UST through week 104 was lower in the T2T vs SoC group (5/145 [3.4%] vs 13/176 [7.4%]).
  • Among patients positive for antidrug antibodies through week 104, 3/5 (60.0%) patients in the T2T group and 10/13 patients (76.9%) in the SoC group were positive for neutralizing antibodies.
  • Increases in endoscopic response and remission rates were observed with increasing UST concentrations at week 48 but not at week 104; see Table: Endoscopic Outcomes at Weeks 48 and 104 by Serum Concentrations.

Endoscopic Outcomes at Weeks 48 and 104 by Serum Concentrations (µg/mL)5
Outcomes
Week 48
Week 104
T2Ta
SoCb
T2Tc
SoCd
Endoscopic response, n/N (%)e
   <Q1
13/34 (38.2)
9/42 (21.4)
10/26 (38.5)
10/32 (31.3)
   ≥Q1 to <Q2
19/35 (54.3)
13/43 (30.2)
15/27 (55.6)
17/32 (53.1)
   ≥Q2 to <Q3
21/35 (60.0)
18/43 (41.9)
18/27 (66.7)
20/32 (62.5)
   ≥Q3
23/35 (65.7)
21/43 (48.8)
12/27 (44.4)
18/32 (56.3)
Endoscopic remission, n/N (%)f
   <Q1
3/34 (8.8)
4/42 (9.5)
2/26 (7.7)
2/32 (6.3)
   ≥Q1 to <Q2
5/35 (14.3)
5/43 (11.6)
9/27 (33.3)
8/32 (25.0)
   ≥Q2 to <Q3
5/35 (14.3)
8/43 (18.6)
8/27 (29.6)
7/32 (21.9)
   ≥Q3
11/35 (31.4)
12/43 (27.9)
6/27 (22.2)
3/32 (9.4)
Abbreviations: Q, quartile; SES-CD, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease; SoC, standard of care; T2T, treat to target.
aWeek 48: Q1=2.3257, Q2= 4.33994, Q3=6.07188; week 104: Q1=1.24292, Q2=2.27931, Q3=4.98978.
bWeek 48: Q1=1.94177, Q2=3.36992, Q3=5.26909; week 104: Q1=1.079265, Q2=2.19592, Q3=4.23387.
cWeek 48: Q1=2.3257, Q2=4.33994, Q3=6.07188; week 104: Q1=1.24292, Q2=2.27931, Q3=4.98978.
dWeek 48: Q1=1.94177, Q2=3.36992, Q3=5.26909; week 104: Q1=1.079265, Q2=2.19592, Q3=4.23387.
eEndoscopic response was defined as a ≥50% decrease in SES-CD score from baseline. Patients with missing data were analyzed as nonresponder.
f
Endoscopic remission was defined as an SES-CD score <3. Patients with missing data were analyzed as nonresponder.

Health-Related Quality of Life
  • In the T2T vs SoC group, the percentage of patients with an IBDQ response (89.4% vs 84.8% of patients, respectively) and remission (76.1% vs 71.2% of patients, respectively) at week 104 were similar.
  • Changes in HRQoL and WPAI measures from baseline to week 104 are reported in Table: Changes from Baseline in HRQoL and WPAI Measures at Week 104 (mRAS).
  • Compared with baseline, patients in the T2T and SoC groups lost an average of 2.2 and 2.3 fewer days from work, respectively, due to CD at week 104.
  • At week 104 vs baseline, 60.9% vs 61.6% patients in the T2T group and 68.7% vs 63.4% patients in the SoC group were in employment.

Changes from Baseline in HRQoL and WPAI Measures at Week 104 (mRAS)7
T2T
SoC
Baselinea
(Mean; 95% CI)

Week 104a
(Mean; 95% CI)

Change from Baseline
(Mean;
95% CI)

Baselinea
(Mean; 95% CI)

Week 104a
(Mean; 95% CI)

Change from Baseline
(Mean;
95% CI)

HRQoLb
IBDQ
n=146
128.4;
122.9-133.9

n=113
187.3;
181.9-192.8

n=113
56.4;
50.0-62.8

n=173
128.2;
122.9-133.4

n=129
180.2;
174.9-185.5

n=129
52.5;
46.2-58.8

EQ-5D-5L
VAS

n=146
54.7;
51.6-57.9

n=113
80.0;
77.2-82.8

n=113
24.4
20.7-28.2

n=174
57.5;
54.6-60.4

n=132
76.9;
74.0-79.9

n=132
19.3;
15.5-23.2

EQ-5D-5L
index

n=145
0.672;
0.640-0.704

n=111
0.864;
0.836-0.891

n=111
0.171;
0.138-0.203

n=173
0.675;
0.645-0.705

n=129
0.849;
0.824-0.873

n=129
0.168;
0.131-0.205

FACIT-F
n=147
28.4;
26.5-30.3

n=114
41.6;
39.9-43.3

n=114
12.7;
10.7-14.6

n=176
27.2;
25.4-28.9

n=135
40.4;
38.7-42.1

n=135
13.1;
11.1-15.0

HADS-A
n=145
7.9;
7.2-8.6

n=110
4.7;
3.9-5.4

n=110
-2.8;
-3.6 to -2.1

n=173
8.1;
7.5-8.7

n=129
4.7;
4.0-5.4

n=129
-3.5;
-4.2 to -2.8

HADS-D
n=145
6.8;
6.1-7.5

n=110
3.4;
2.6-4.1

n=110
-3.0;
-3.7 to -2.2

n=173
6.6;
6.0-7.2

n=129
3.7;
3.0-4.3

n=129
-3.0;
-3.7 to -2.3

WPAIb
Absenteeism
n=71
23.1;
15.0-31.2

n=42
3.0;
-0.5 to 6.4

n=42
-15.5;
-26.0 to -5.0

n=89
19.6;
12.9-26.3

n=51
8.0;
2.5-13.5

n=51
-7.8;
-16.0 to 0.5

Presenteeism
n=81
44.8;
38.5-51.1

n=53
12.1;
6.8-17.4

n=53
-28.7;
-37.6 to -19.7

n=96
47.6;
41.6-53.6

n=60
17.7;
11.9-23.5

n=60
-28.3;
-36.3 to -20.3

Work productivity loss
n=67
54.4;
46.8-62.0

n=41
16.0;
8.9-23.1

n=41
-31.9;
-43.5 to -20.4

n=79
50.0;
43.0-56.9

n=43
19.7;
11.6-27.7

n=43
-25.6;
-36.3 to -14.9

Activity impairment
n=142
51.1;
46.9-55.4

n=110
14.7;
10.6-18.8

n=110
-32.8;
-38.5 to -27.2

n=171
50.1;
46.0-54.2

n=130
19.1;
15.3-22.9

n=130.
-30.1;
-35.1 to -25.1

Note: Only patients with nonmissing baseline value and at least 1 nonmissing postbaseline value during the main treatment period are included in the analysis.
Abbreviations:
CI, confidence interval; EQ-5D-5L, European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level; FACITF, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; HADS-A and D, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale  Anxiety and Depression subscales, respectively; HRQoL, health-related quality of life; IBDQ, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire; mRAS, modified randomized analysis set; SoC, standard of care; T2T, treat to target; VAS, visual analog scale; WPAI, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment.
aAbsolute value.
b
Data were analyzed as observed.

Safety through Week 104

TEAEs from Week 48 through Week 104 in Patients Entering LTE5
AEs, n (%)
T2T
(n=147)

SoC
(n=176)

Any AE
108 (73.5)
120 (68.2)
AE occurring in ≥10% of patients
   Nasopharyngitis
12 (8.2)
16 (9.1)
   Infections
15 (10.2)
30 (17.0)
   CD
10 (6.8)
9 (5.1)
   Headache
7 (4.8)
17 (9.7)
   Pyrexia
4 (2.7)
16 (9.1)
   Arthralgia
8 (5.4)
12 (6.8)
   Abdominal pain
9 (6.1)
13 (7.4)
   Back pain
8 (5.4)
10 (5.7)
Any serious AEs
12 (8.2)
13 (7.4)
   Infections
3 (2.0)
2 (1.1)
   Deathsa
0
1 (0.3)
   Malignancies
3 (2.0)
2 (1.1)
AE leading to discontinuation
9 (6.1)
4 (2.3)
Injection site reactions
1 (0.7)
2 (1.1)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CD, Crohn’s disease; LTE, long-term extension; SoC, standard of care; T2T, treat to target; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.
a
AEs leading to death were based on an AE outcome of “fatal.”

  • One patient in the T2T group reported a nonserious basal cell carcinoma during the LTE.
  • The most common TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation was CD (T2T group, 3 [2.0%]; SoC group, none).
  • One patient each in the T2T group had a serious AE of a severe CD flare and a serious Campylobacter infection.
  • TEAEs included 5 reports of malignancy: lung adenoma, plasma cell myeloma, and superficial spreading melanoma stage unspecified in the T2T group and cervical neoplasm and malignant melanoma in the SoC group.
    • The malignant melanoma was considered by the investigator to be related to STELARA and the cervical neoplasm was fatal.

LITERATURE SEARCH

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 06 September 2024.

 

References

1 Danese S, Vermeire S, D’Haens G, et al. Endoscopic response to induction with ustekinumab in Crohn’s disease: STARDUST interim analysis. Poster presented at: Digestive Disease Week (DDW); May 2-5, 2020; Virtual Meeting.  
2 Danese S, Vermeire S, D’Haens G, et al. Clinical and endoscopic response to treat-to-target versus standard of care in Crohn’s disease patients treated with ustekinumab: week 48 results of the STARDUST trial. Oral presentation presented at: United European Gastroenterology Week (UEGW); October 11-13, 2020; Virtual Meeting.  
3 Danese S, Vermeire S, D’Haens G, et al. Treat to target versus standard of care for patients with Crohn’s disease treated with ustekinumab (STARDUST): an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3b trial [published correction appears in Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Apr;7(4):e8]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;7(4):294-306.  
4 Kucharzik T, Wilkens R, D’Agostino MA, et al. Early ultrasound response and progressive transmural remission after treatment with ustekinumab in Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21(1):153-163.e12.  
5 Peyrin-Biroulet L, Vermeire S, D’Haens G, et al. Clinical trial: clinical and endoscopic outcomes with ustekinumab in patients with Crohn’s disease: results from the long‐term extension period of STARDUST. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024;59(2):175-185.  
6 Peyrin-Biroulet L, Vermeire S, D’Haens G, et al. Efficacy of the treat-to-target approach in modifying disease course with ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s Disease: results from the STARDUST trial. J Crohns Colitis. 2022;16(Suppl 1):i132-i134.  
7 Peyrin-Biroulet L, Vermeire S, D’Haens G, et al. Ustekinumab improves health-related quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease: results up to week 104 of the STARDUST trial. Poster presented at: United European Gastroenterology Week (UEGW); October 8-11, 2022; Vienna, Austria and Virtual.  
8 Peyrin-Biroulet L, Vermeire S, D’Haens G, et al. Clinical and endoscopic outcomes with ustekinumab in patients with Crohn’s disease: results from the long‐term extension period of the STARDUST trial. J United Eur Gastroent. 2021;9(Suppl 8):1213-1215.  
9 Danese S, Vermeire S, D’Haens G, et al. Supplement to: Treat to target versus standard of care for patients with Crohn’s disease treated with ustekinumab (STARDUST): an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3b trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;7(4):294-306.  
10 Kucharzik T, Wilkens R, D’Agostino MA, et al. Supplement to: Early ultrasound response and progressive transmural remission after treatment with ustekinumab in Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21(1):153-163.e12.  
11 Peyrin-Biroulet L, Vermeire S, D’Haens G, et al. Supplement to: Clinical trial: clinical and endoscopic outcomes with ustekinumab in patients with Crohn’s disease: results from the long‐term extension period of STARDUST. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024;59(2):175-185.