This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.
Summary
- The company cannot recommend any practices, procedures or usage that deviate from the approved labeling.
- A post-hoc analysis from 2 phase 3 multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, evaluated the efficacy and safety of STELARA in 256 adult psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients with spondylarthritis at baseline (27.6% of PSUMMIT I and PSUMMIT II population, including 32 bio-experienced).1,2
Subanalysis
Kavanaugh et al (2015)1,2 evaluated the efficacy and safety of STELARA in adult PsA patients with spondylarthritis as well as peripheral arthritis from the PSUMMIT I and PSUMMIT II phase 3 clinical trials.
Study Design/Methods
- Adult patients with active PsA were randomized to receive placebo, STELARA 45 mg, or STELARA 90 mg at weeks 0, 4, and every 12 weeks thereafter.
- Patients with <5% improvement in swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) entered early escape in a blinded fashion at week 16.
- At weeks 24, patients receiving placebo crossed over to STELARA 45 mg and continued STELARA treatment at week 28 and every 12 weeks thereafter.
- At baseline, week 12, and week 24, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores were collected.
Patient Characteristics
- Of the 256 patients with spondylarthritis at baseline, 92 received placebo and 164 received STELARA.
- At baseline, patients were receiving methotrexate (MTX; 47.7%), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; 77%), and low-dose oral corticosteroids (20.7%), which was consistent with the overall population.
Efficacy
PSUMMIT I and II - Efficacy Outcomes in Patients with Spondylitis and Peripheral Joint Involvement at Baseline1,2 |
|
|
---|
|
|
|
|
---|
BASDAI 20/50/70 (%)a
| 32.9/11.4/0
| 54.8/29.3/15.3
| –
| –
|
Mean improvement in BASDAI score (SD)
| 0.74 (1.606)
| 2.05 (2.249)
| –
| –
|
Mean % improvement from baseline in entheses score (MASES index)b
| n=63 16.0 (99.93)c
| n=132 46.7 (48.69)c P=0.017
| n=60 53.06 (87.50)d
| n=127 54.76 (73.33)d
|
Mean % change from baseline in dactylitis scoree
| n=41 11.0 (77.67)c
| n=83 57.5 (62.84)c P<0.001
| n=39 69.76 (100.00)d
| n=82 68.94 (100.00)d
|
ACR 20/50/70 (%)
| n=92 22.8/3.3/1.1
| n=164 43.9f/25.6/11.0 fP<0.001
| n=81 65.4/39.5/16.0
| n=156 62.8/34.6/19.2
|
Mean (SD) improvement from baseline in HAQ-DI
| n=92 0.11 (0.386)
| n=164 0.33 (0.533) P<0.001
| n=81 0.39 (0.42)
| n=156 0.37 (0.55)
|
Mean (SD) improvement from baseline in DLQI
| n=64 1.97 (5.252)
| n=134 8.08 (6.706)
| –
| –
|
PASI 75 responseg
| n=69 11.6%
| n=137 63.5%; P<0.001
| n=61 65.5%
| n=129 70.5%
|
Total vdH-S mean change from baseline (peripheral joints)
| 1.51 (6.41)
| 0.00 (1.69); P=0.003
| 3.04 (11.86)
| 0.25 (2.13)
|
Abbreviations: ACR, American College of Rheumatology; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index; MASES, Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score; PASI, psoriatic area and severity index; SD, standard deviation; vdH-S, van der Heijde-Sharp score. Patients who did not receive STELARA excluded. aBASDAI not collected at week 52. bEnthesitis and dactylitis. cMean (standard deviation [SD]). dMean (median). eWith spondylitis and peripheral joint involvement at baseline. fACR20 only. gPatients with ≥3% body surface area psoriasis involvement with spondylitis and peripheral joint involvement at baseline.
|
- The mean (standard deviation [SD]) improvement in the score for the BASDAI question related to the overall level of axial disease (neck, back, or hip pain) was greater in the combined STELARA group (1.85 [2.678]) than in the placebo group (0.24 [2.309]; P<0.001).
Safety
- Rates of adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE), discontinuations due to AEs, and infections through the placebo-controlled period were 41.3%, 2.2%, 3.3% and 16.3% in the placebo group vs 34.8%, 1.2%, 0.6%, and 13.4% in the combined STELARA group, respectively.
- Safety was reported to be consistent with that observed in the overall PsA population through 1 year.
LITERATURE SEARCH
A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 03 June 2024. Summarized in this response are relevant data from the PSUMMIT I and PSUMMIT II clinical studies.
1 | Kavanaugh A, Puig L, Gottlieb A, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in psoriatic arthritis patients with spondylarthritis as well as peripheral arthritis: results from 2 phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(suppl 10). |
2 | Kavanaugh A, Puig L, Gottlieb AB, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in psoriatic arthritis patients with peripheral arthritis and physician-reported spondylitis: post-hoc analyses from two phase III, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (PSUMMIT-1/PSUMMIT-2). Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(11):1984-1988. |