This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.
Summary
- The company cannot recommend any practices, procedures, or usage that deviate from the approved labeling.
- There are available data on the use of STELARA in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) from prospective studies, retrospective studies, and case series.1-6
Prospective Studies
Sanchez-Martinez et al (2020)1 reported efficacy and safety results from a prospective analysis of STELARA in 6 patients with refractory HS.
Study Design/Methods
- Patients with HS treated with STELARA from January 2017 to August 2018 were included in the prospective analysis.
- Patients received a weight-based induction dose, followed by a subcutaneous maintenance dose of 90 mg every 8 weeks.
- The primary endpoint was clinical response, assessed by International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), prior to treatment and at week 12.
- The secondary endpoint was safety, which included the incidence and severity of side effects based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) classification.
Results
Demographics and Clinical Baseline Characteristics1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---|
1
| 31/F
| Down syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune hypothyroidism
| III
| Antibiotics, surgery, methotrexate, oral retinoids, systemic and topical corticosteroids, adalimumab
| Secondary failure to adalimumab
| Intralesional corticosteroids
|
2
| 58/M
| Tobacco, Crohn's disease
| III
| Antibiotics, surgery, methotrexate, azathioprine, oral retinoids, finasteride, systemic and topical corticosteroids, adalimumab
| Secondary failure to adalimumab
| Intralesional corticosteroids, antibiotics, surgery
|
3
| 34/F
| Tobacco
| III
| Antibiotics, surgery, oral retinoids, adalimumab
| Contraindication of adalimumab due to paradoxical arthropathy
| Antibiotics
|
4
| 59/M
| Tobacco, COPD, Warthin tumor, chronic ischemic heart disease
| III
| Antibiotics, surgery, oral retinoids, finasteride, adalimumab
| Contraindication of adalimumab due to gammopathy of undetermined significance
| Oral retinoids
|
5
| 52/M
| Tobacco, depression
| III
| Antibiotics, oral retinoids, systemic corticosteroids, adalimumab
| Primary failure to adalimumab
| None
|
6
| 48/F
| Tobacco, diabetes mellitus type 2, glaucoma
| III
| Antibiotics, oral retinoids, systemic corticosteroids, adalimumab
| Secondary failure to adalimumab
| Oral retinoids
|
Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; F, female; M, male; y, years.
|
Efficacy Results at Week 121
|
|
|
|
---|
1
| 5 (moderate)
| 0
| Yes
|
2
| 12 (severe)
| 12 (severe)
| No
|
3
| 4 (moderate)
| 2 (mild)
| No
|
4
| 58 (severe)
| 22 (severe)
| Yes
|
5
| 6 (moderate)
| 4 (moderate)
| No
|
6
| 8 (moderate)
| 0 (mild)
| Yes
|
Abbreviations: HiSCR, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response; IHS4, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System.
|
- No adverse effects were reported during the 12-week follow-up period.
Blok et al (2016)2 conducted an open-label, prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of STELARA in 17 patients with moderate-to-severe HS.
Study Design/Methods
- Patients were eligible if they had moderate-to-severe HS (Hurley stage II-III) with a treatment history of at least 1 systemic anti-inflammatory/immunosuppressive agent or surgery.
- The washout period for systemic immunosuppressive medication was at least 3 months.
- Patients received STELARA 45 mg (if patient was ≤100 kg) or 90 mg (if patient was >100 kg) at weeks 0 and 4 (induction phase) and at weeks 16 and 28 (maintenance phase).
- The intervention period was 40 weeks, which consisted of a treatment phase
(weeks 0-28), followed by a 12-week posttreatment phase. - Topical resorcinol 15% cream for incision and drainage of acutely painful lesions were the only escape treatments allowed.
- Assessments were performed at baseline (week 0) and at weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, 34, and 40.
- At every visit, the modified Sartorius scale (mSS) score was assessed. A ≥50% reduction in these scores was considered a marked response; a 25%-49% reduction, a moderate response; a 1%-24% reduction, a mild response; and a ≤0% reduction, a nonresponse.
- A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to determine the degree of experienced pain. The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Skindex-29 questionnaire were used to investigate patient-reported outcomes.
- The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with marked improvement (≥50% reduction) in mSS score at week 40. Secondary outcomes included the mean change in patient-reported pain, Skindex-29 score, and the DLQI.
Patient Characteristics
- Seventeen patients (4 men, 13 women) were included in the study.
- Twelve patients completed the protocol. Five patients dropped out of the study due to unresponsiveness to STELARA (n=3), withdrawal of informed consent for psychological reasons (n=1), and an adverse event (AE) of urticaria (n=1).
- The mean age was 35 years (range, 20-53), mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.3 kg/m2, and mean disease duration was 18 years.
Efficacy
- At week 40, of the 17 patients, improvement of the mSS was deemed marked in 6 (35%), moderate in 8 (47%), and mild in 1 (6%); there was no change in or worsening of the mSS in 2 patients (12%).
- The mean mSS of the intent-to-treat population significantly reduced from 112.12 at baseline to 60.18 at week 40 (46.33% improvement; P<0.01).
- The mean reported pain on the VAS (0-10) was 5.8 at the start of treatment and 4.6 at week 40.
- At week 40, of the 17 patients, there was a clinically meaningful improvement on the Skindex-29 overall domain (score decrease by at least 1 compared with week 0) in 6 (35%), on the functioning domain in 8 (47%), on the emotions domain in 4 (24%), and on the symptoms domain in 3 (18%).
- At baseline, the DLQI indicated that HS had a very large (score of 11-20) or extremely large (score of 21-30) effect on daily life in 71% of patients; at week 40, this had reduced to 59%. At week 40, clinically meaningful improvement of the DLQI (reduction of ≥5 points) was observed in 7 patients (41%).
- Resorcinol 15% cream was used by 4 patients for troublesome inflammatory lesions and for incision and drainage by 1 patient.
- The protocol was violated for 2 patients: they received intralesional corticosteroids for painful lesions that were not suitable for incision and drainage.
Safety
- The most common AEs were headache, fatigue, and upper respiratory tract infections.
- All AEs were considered mild and temporary.
Retrospective Studies
Hollywood et al (2022)3 conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the response, tolerability, and drug survival of STELARA in patients with HS.
Study Design/Methods
- Patients with HS treated with STELARA who attended 1 follow-up appointment from January 2017 to September 2020 were included in this analysis.
- A consultant dermatologist with a specialist interest in HS reviewed all patients.
- Improvement was defined as reduced flare count (patient-reported based on increased symptoms and formation of new lesions) and improvement in quality of life (QoL), as measured by the DLQI.
Patient Characteristics
- The baseline demographics and clinical characteristics of the 16 patients included in this study are summarized in Table: Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics.
- All patients had failed first-line treatments (outlined in the British Association of Dermatology [BAD] HS guidelines).
- Prior treatments included the following: tetracycline, 100% (n=16); clindamycin and rifampicin, 69% (n=11); metformin, 69% (n=11); dapsone, 50% (n=8); liraglutide, 25% (n=4); anakinra, 25% (n=4); and spironolactone, 12.5% (n=2).
- All patients (n=16) had failed adalimumab as monotherapy, and 56% (n=9) had failed infliximab.
- Three patients were started on STELARA therapy for management of coexisting Crohn’s disease.
Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics3
|
|
---|
Age, mean (range), years
| 37 (22-70)
|
Female, n (%)
| 12 (75)
|
Body weight, mean (range), kg
| 102 (56-169)
|
HS severity
|
Moderate (Hurley stage II), %
| 25
|
Severe (Hurley stage III), %
| 75
|
Smoking, n
| |
Current
| 8
|
History
| 4
|
Depression, n
| 5
|
Crohn’s disease, n
| 3
|
Pyoderma gangrenosum, n
| 2
|
Psoriasis, n
| 2
|
Abbreviation: HS, hidradenitis suppurativa.
|
Efficacy
- Subjective clinical improvement was observed in 56% of patients (9/16), and no clinical improvement, in 25% of patients (4/16). Three of the 16 patients switched from adalimumab to STELARA for the management of Crohn’s disease, and all 3 patients maintained good control of HS symptoms.
- Of the 9 patients with subjective clinical improvement, 8 had severe disease (Hurley stage III) and 1 had moderate disease (Hurley stage II).
- The mean pretreatment DLQI was 16.6 (range, 1-25), and mean follow-up DLQI was 10.25 (range, 1-27).
- The mean duration of treatment was 16 months.
- Drug survival at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 94% (15/16), 61% (8/13), 50% (4/8), and 33% (2/6), respectively.
Safety
- Eight patients discontinued treatment due to primary failure (n=3), secondary failure (n=1), suboptimal clinical improvement (n=2), recurrent infections (n=1), and quiescent Crohn’s disease (n=1).
Montero-Vinchez et al (2022)4 evaluated the outcomes of STELARA in a retrospective, multicenter series of patients with HS between November 2017 and December 2019.
Study Design/Methods
- Patients with moderate to severe HS (Hurley stage II-III) who failed previous treatment were included.
- Disease severity was assessed using the Physician’s Global Assessment (HS-PGA), and pain was assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).
- The primary outcome was a ≥1-point reduction in HS-PGA, and the secondary outcome was a decrease of ≥20% in NPRS.
- Safety was evaluated using clinical records.
Results
- Ten patients were included; the median age was 44 years.
- Four patients had concomitant components of the follicular occlusion tetrad, and 2 patients had Crohn’s disease.
- Overall, 90% (9/10) of patients (adalimumab, 8; infliximab, 4) were biologic-experienced and 10% (1/10) of patient was biologic-naïve.
- All patients received STELARA for psoriasis.
- The median treatment duration was 48 weeks.
- A reduction of at least 1 point in HS-PGA was reported in 70% (7/10) of patients, and a reduction of ≥2 points in NPRS was reported in 80% (8/10) of patients.
- Among patients with no improvement, no worsening in HS severity or symptoms was reported.
- No treatment-related AEs were reported.
Case Series
Jiang et al (2022)5 reported results of STELARA in the treatment of HS in 6 patients with Hurley stage III disease from January 2017 to June 2021.
- The mean age was 53.5 years, and the mean BMI was 38.1 kg/m2.
- All 6 patients were African American, 5 of whom were female.
- All patients had been previously treated with adalimumab, and 4, with infliximab.
- STELARA maintenance dose was 90 mg every 4 weeks for 5 patients and 90 mg every 8 weeks for 1 patient.
- At weeks 8-12, compared with baseline, mean percentage change in IHS4 was -36.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], -70.9% to -1.3%), total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count change was -6.9 (95% CI, -13.6 to -0.2), and mean difference in VAS pain score was -2.5 (95% CI, -5.5 to 0.5).
- Reductions in draining fistulae and AN count were observed with a decrease in IHS4.
- An unadjusted regression analysis showed that IHS4 decreased by 0.43 per week and draining fistulae decreased by 0.09 per week.
- No adverse reactions were reported.
Valenzuela-Ubina et al (2022)6 evaluated STELARA for the treatment of HS in a case series of 10 patients.
- The mean age was 42.9 years, and 60% (6/10) were female.
- Eight patients were previously treated with adalimumab.
- Clinical severity was assessed using the Hurley staging system and HS-PGA scale.
- Analytical parameters of systemic inflammation (APSI) included serum C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and leukocyte levels.
- At baseline, 90% of patients had Hurley stage III disease and 1 patient had stage II disease.
- HS-PGA scale was reported as moderate to severe in 2 patients, severe in 5 patients, and very severe in 1 patient.
- STELARA 90 mg subcutaneously every 2 months was initiated for 9 patients. The remaining 1 patient received STELARA 45 mg subcutaneously every 3 months. The average treatment duration was 17.6 months (range, 4-29).
- Nine patients responded to STELARA treatment and achieved a HiSCR therapeutic outcome.
- Eight patients achieved a reduction of 1 Hurley stage, and 2 patients remained in stage III after finishing treatment.
- All 9 responding patients achieved a reduction of ≥1 point in HS-PGA.
- After STELARA initiation, 80% of patients continued treatment and reported mild
HS-PGA. - Statistically significant mean APSI decrease was reported in all patients, with P values of 0.002, 0.015, and 0.0004 for leukocytes, ESR, and CRP, respectively.
- One patient who received a lower STELARA dosage did not respond to treatment.
- No treatment-related AEs were reported.
LITERATURE SEARCH
A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 03 June 2024.
1 | Sánchez‐Martínez EM, García‐Ruiz R, Moneva‐Léniz LM, et al. Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa using intravenous induction. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(6):e14054. |
2 | Blok JL, Li K, Brodmerkel C, et al. Ustekinumab in hidradenitis suppurativa: clinical results and a search for potential biomarkers in serum. Brit J Dermatol. 2016;174(4):839-846. |
3 | Hollywood A, Murray G, Fleming S, et al. Ustekinumab in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa: a retrospective study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(3):319-320. |
4 | Montero-Vilchez T, Pozo-Román T, Sánchez-Velicia L, et al. Ustekinumab in the treatment of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: multicenter case series and systematic review. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(1):348-353. |
5 | Jiang S, Kwock J, Liu B, et al. High-dose, high-frequency ustekinumab therapy for patients with severe hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol. 2022;187(3):417-419. |
6 | Valenzuela-Ubiña S, Jiménez-Gallo D, Villegas-Romero I, et al. Effectiveness of ustekinumab for moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a case series. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(2):1159-1162. |