This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

Use of STELARA in the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Last Updated: 01/02/2025

Summary

  • The company cannot recommend any practices, procedures, or usage that deviate from the approved labeling.
  • There are available data on the use of STELARA in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) from prospective studies, retrospective studies, and case series.1-6

CLINICAL DATA

Prospective Studies

Sanchez-Martinez et al (2020)1 reported efficacy and safety results from a prospective analysis of STELARA in 6 patients with refractory HS.

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients with HS treated with STELARA from January 2017 to August 2018 were included in the prospective analysis.
  • Patients received a weight-based induction dose, followed by a subcutaneous maintenance dose of 90 mg every 8 weeks.
  • The primary endpoint was clinical response, assessed by International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), prior to treatment and at week 12.
  • The secondary endpoint was safety, which included the incidence and severity of side effects based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) classification.

Results


Demographics and Clinical Baseline Characteristics1
Patient No.
Age, y/ Gender
Comorbidities
Hurley Stage
Previous Treatments
Indication for STELARA
Concomitant Treatments
1
31/F
Down syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune hypothyroidism
III
Antibiotics, surgery, methotrexate, oral retinoids, systemic and topical corticosteroids, adalimumab
Secondary failure to adalimumab
Intralesional corticosteroids
2
58/M
Tobacco, Crohn's disease
III
Antibiotics, surgery, methotrexate, azathioprine, oral retinoids, finasteride, systemic and topical corticosteroids, adalimumab
Secondary failure to adalimumab
Intralesional corticosteroids, antibiotics, surgery
3
34/F
Tobacco
III
Antibiotics, surgery, oral retinoids, adalimumab
Contraindication of adalimumab due to paradoxical arthropathy
Antibiotics
4
59/M
Tobacco, COPD, Warthin tumor, chronic ischemic heart disease
III
Antibiotics, surgery, oral retinoids, finasteride, adalimumab
Contraindication of adalimumab due to gammopathy of undetermined significance
Oral retinoids
5
52/M
Tobacco, depression
III
Antibiotics, oral retinoids, systemic corticosteroids, adalimumab
Primary failure to adalimumab
None
6
48/F
Tobacco, diabetes mellitus type 2, glaucoma
III
Antibiotics, oral retinoids, systemic corticosteroids, adalimumab
Secondary failure to adalimumab
Oral retinoids
Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; F, female; M, male; y, years.

Efficacy Results at Week 121
Patient No.
IHS4 at Baseline (Severity)
IHS4 at Week 12 (Severity)
HiSCR
1
5 (moderate)
0
Yes
2
12 (severe)
12 (severe)
No
3
4 (moderate)
2 (mild)
No
4
58 (severe)
22 (severe)
Yes
5
6 (moderate)
4 (moderate)
No
6
8 (moderate)
0 (mild)
Yes
Abbreviations: HiSCR, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response; IHS4, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System.
  • No adverse effects were reported during the 12-week follow-up period.

Blok et al (2016)2 conducted an open-label, prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of STELARA in 17 patients with moderate-to-severe HS.

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients were eligible if they had moderate-to-severe HS (Hurley stage II-III) with a treatment history of at least 1 systemic anti-inflammatory/immunosuppressive agent or surgery.
  • The washout period for systemic immunosuppressive medication was at least 3 months.
  • Patients received STELARA 45 mg (if patient was ≤100 kg) or 90 mg (if patient was >100 kg) at weeks 0 and 4 (induction phase) and at weeks 16 and 28 (maintenance phase).
  • The intervention period was 40 weeks, which consisted of a treatment phase
    (weeks 0-28), followed by a 12-week posttreatment phase.
  • Topical resorcinol 15% cream for incision and drainage of acutely painful lesions were the only escape treatments allowed.
  • Assessments were performed at baseline (week 0) and at weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, 34, and 40.
  • At every visit, the modified Sartorius scale (mSS) score was assessed. A ≥50% reduction in these scores was considered a marked response; a 25%-49% reduction, a moderate response; a 1%-24% reduction, a mild response; and a ≤0% reduction, a nonresponse.
  • A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to determine the degree of experienced pain. The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Skindex-29 questionnaire were used to investigate patient-reported outcomes.
  • The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with marked improvement (≥50% reduction) in mSS score at week 40. Secondary outcomes included the mean change in patient-reported pain, Skindex-29 score, and the DLQI.

Results

Patient Characteristics
  • Seventeen patients (4 men, 13 women) were included in the study.
  • Twelve patients completed the protocol. Five patients dropped out of the study due to unresponsiveness to STELARA (n=3), withdrawal of informed consent for psychological reasons (n=1), and an adverse event (AE) of urticaria (n=1).
  • The mean age was 35 years (range, 20-53), mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.3 kg/m2, and mean disease duration was 18 years.
Efficacy
  • At week 40, of the 17 patients, improvement of the mSS was deemed marked in 6 (35%), moderate in 8 (47%), and mild in 1 (6%); there was no change in or worsening of the mSS in 2 patients (12%).
  • The mean mSS of the intent-to-treat population significantly reduced from 112.12 at baseline to 60.18 at week 40 (46.33% improvement; P<0.01).
  • The mean reported pain on the VAS (0-10) was 5.8 at the start of treatment and 4.6 at week 40.
  • At week 40, of the 17 patients, there was a clinically meaningful improvement on the Skindex-29 overall domain (score decrease by at least 1 compared with week 0) in 6 (35%), on the functioning domain in 8 (47%), on the emotions domain in 4 (24%), and on the symptoms domain in 3 (18%).
  • At baseline, the DLQI indicated that HS had a very large (score of 11-20) or extremely large (score of 21-30) effect on daily life in 71% of patients; at week 40, this had reduced to 59%. At week 40, clinically meaningful improvement of the DLQI (reduction of ≥5 points) was observed in 7 patients (41%).
  • Resorcinol 15% cream was used by 4 patients for troublesome inflammatory lesions and for incision and drainage by 1 patient.
  • The protocol was violated for 2 patients: they received intralesional corticosteroids for painful lesions that were not suitable for incision and drainage.
Safety
  • The most common AEs were headache, fatigue, and upper respiratory tract infections.
  • All AEs were considered mild and temporary.

Retrospective Studies

Hollywood et al (2022)3 conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the response, tolerability, and drug survival of STELARA in patients with HS.

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients with HS treated with STELARA who attended 1 follow-up appointment from January 2017 to September 2020 were included in this analysis.
  • A consultant dermatologist with a specialist interest in HS reviewed all patients.
  • Improvement was defined as reduced flare count (patient-reported based on increased symptoms and formation of new lesions) and improvement in quality of life (QoL), as measured by the DLQI.

Results

Patient Characteristics
  • The baseline demographics and clinical characteristics of the 16 patients included in this study are summarized in Table: Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics.
  • All patients had failed first-line treatments (outlined in the British Association of Dermatology [BAD] HS guidelines).
    • Prior treatments included the following: tetracycline, 100% (n=16); clindamycin and rifampicin, 69% (n=11); metformin, 69% (n=11); dapsone, 50% (n=8); liraglutide, 25% (n=4); anakinra, 25% (n=4); and spironolactone, 12.5% (n=2).
    • All patients (n=16) had failed adalimumab as monotherapy, and 56% (n=9) had failed infliximab.
    • Three patients were started on STELARA therapy for management of coexisting Crohn’s disease.

Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics3
Characteristic
STELARA
(N=16)

Age, mean (range), years
37 (22-70)
Female, n (%)
12 (75)
Body weight, mean (range), kg
102 (56-169)
HS severity
   Moderate (Hurley stage II), %
25
   Severe (Hurley stage III), %
75
Smoking, n
   Current
8
   History
4
Depression, n
5
Crohn’s disease, n
3
Pyoderma gangrenosum, n
2
Psoriasis, n
2
Abbreviation: HS, hidradenitis suppurativa.
Efficacy
  • Subjective clinical improvement was observed in 56% of patients (9/16), and no clinical improvement, in 25% of patients (4/16). Three of the 16 patients switched from adalimumab to STELARA for the management of Crohn’s disease, and all 3 patients maintained good control of HS symptoms.
    • Of the 9 patients with subjective clinical improvement, 8 had severe disease (Hurley stage III) and 1 had moderate disease (Hurley stage II).
  • The mean pretreatment DLQI was 16.6 (range, 1-25), and mean follow-up DLQI was 10.25 (range, 1-27).
  • The mean duration of treatment was 16 months.
  • Drug survival at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 94% (15/16), 61% (8/13), 50% (4/8), and 33% (2/6), respectively.
Safety
  • Eight patients discontinued treatment due to primary failure (n=3), secondary failure (n=1), suboptimal clinical improvement (n=2), recurrent infections (n=1), and quiescent Crohn’s disease (n=1).

Montero-Vinchez et al (2022)4 evaluated the outcomes of STELARA in a retrospective, multicenter series of patients with HS between November 2017 and December 2019.

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients with moderate to severe HS (Hurley stage II-III) who failed previous treatment were included.
  • Disease severity was assessed using the Physician’s Global Assessment (HS-PGA), and pain was assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).
  • The primary outcome was a ≥1-point reduction in HS-PGA, and the secondary outcome was a decrease of ≥20% in NPRS.
  • Safety was evaluated using clinical records.

Results

  • Ten patients were included; the median age was 44 years.
  • Four patients had concomitant components of the follicular occlusion tetrad, and 2 patients had Crohn’s disease.
  • Overall, 90% (9/10) of patients (adalimumab, 8; infliximab, 4) were biologic-experienced and 10% (1/10) of patient was biologic-naïve.
  • All patients received STELARA for psoriasis.
  • The median treatment duration was 48 weeks.
  • A reduction of at least 1 point in HS-PGA was reported in 70% (7/10) of patients, and a reduction of ≥2 points in NPRS was reported in 80% (8/10) of patients.
  • Among patients with no improvement, no worsening in HS severity or symptoms was reported.
  • No treatment-related AEs were reported.

Case Series

Jiang et al (2022)5 reported results of STELARA in the treatment of HS in 6 patients with Hurley stage III disease from January 2017 to June 2021.

  • The mean age was 53.5 years, and the mean BMI was 38.1 kg/m2.
  • All 6 patients were African American, 5 of whom were female.
  • All patients had been previously treated with adalimumab, and 4, with infliximab.
  • STELARA maintenance dose was 90 mg every 4 weeks for 5 patients and 90 mg every 8 weeks for 1 patient.
  • At weeks 8-12, compared with baseline, mean percentage change in IHS4 was -36.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], -70.9% to -1.3%), total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count change was -6.9 (95% CI, -13.6 to -0.2), and mean difference in VAS pain score was -2.5 (95% CI, -5.5 to 0.5).
  • Reductions in draining fistulae and AN count were observed with a decrease in IHS4.
  • An unadjusted regression analysis showed that IHS4 decreased by 0.43 per week and draining fistulae decreased by 0.09 per week.
  • No adverse reactions were reported.

Valenzuela-Ubina et al (2022)6 evaluated STELARA for the treatment of HS in a case series of 10 patients.

  • The mean age was 42.9 years, and 60% (6/10) were female.
  • Eight patients were previously treated with adalimumab.
  • Clinical severity was assessed using the Hurley staging system and HS-PGA scale.
  • Analytical parameters of systemic inflammation (APSI) included serum C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and leukocyte levels.
  • At baseline, 90% of patients had Hurley stage III disease and 1 patient had stage II disease.
  • HS-PGA scale was reported as moderate to severe in 2 patients, severe in 5 patients, and very severe in 1 patient.
  • STELARA 90 mg subcutaneously every 2 months was initiated for 9 patients. The remaining 1 patient received STELARA 45 mg subcutaneously every 3 months. The average treatment duration was 17.6 months (range, 4-29).
  • Nine patients responded to STELARA treatment and achieved a HiSCR therapeutic outcome.
  • Eight patients achieved a reduction of 1 Hurley stage, and 2 patients remained in stage III after finishing treatment.
  • All 9 responding patients achieved a reduction of ≥1 point in HS-PGA.
  • After STELARA initiation, 80% of patients continued treatment and reported mild
    HS-PGA.
  • Statistically significant mean APSI decrease was reported in all patients, with P values of 0.002, 0.015, and 0.0004 for leukocytes, ESR, and CRP, respectively.
  • One patient who received a lower STELARA dosage did not respond to treatment.
  • No treatment-related AEs were reported.

LITERATURE SEARCH

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 03 June 2024.

References

1 Sánchez‐Martínez EM, García‐Ruiz R, Moneva‐Léniz LM, et al. Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa using intravenous induction. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(6):e14054.  
2 Blok JL, Li K, Brodmerkel C, et al. Ustekinumab in hidradenitis suppurativa: clinical results and a search for potential biomarkers in serum. Brit J Dermatol. 2016;174(4):839-846.  
3 Hollywood A, Murray G, Fleming S, et al. Ustekinumab in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa: a retrospective study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(3):319-320.  
4 Montero-Vilchez T, Pozo-Román T, Sánchez-Velicia L, et al. Ustekinumab in the treatment of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: multicenter case series and systematic review. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(1):348-353.  
5 Jiang S, Kwock J, Liu B, et al. High-dose, high-frequency ustekinumab therapy for patients with severe hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol. 2022;187(3):417-419.  
6 Valenzuela-Ubiña S, Jiménez-Gallo D, Villegas-Romero I, et al. Effectiveness of ustekinumab for moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a case series. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(2):1159-1162.