This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

TALVEY - Drug Interactions in the MonumenTAL-1 Study

Last Updated: 09/11/2024

SUMMARY

  • No drug interaction studies have been performed with TALVEY.1
  • MonumenTAL-1 (MMY1001) is an ongoing, open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of TALVEY in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after ≥3 prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor (PI), an immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody.2-4
    • Per protocol, cytochrome P450 (CYP450) substrates with narrow therapeutic index should be used with caution when administered concomitantly with TALVEY.4
  • Willemin et al (2023)5 conducted a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling study to evaluate the potential impact of elevated interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels during cytokine release syndrome (CRS) on the exposure of CYP450 substrates coadministered with TALVEY. Drug-drug interaction (DDI) liability was predicted based on simulations of CYP450 substrate interaction at observed median and highest IL-6 levels in patients administered TALVEY at the recommended phase 2 doses (RP2Ds; 0.4 mg/kg weekly [QW] and 0.8 mg/kg every other week [Q2W]) in the MonumenTAL-1 study.

BACKGROUND

  • CRS occurs with TALVEY, consistent with its mechanism of action.5 Elevated IL-6 levels that occur during CRS can suppress CYP450 enzymes, potentially resulting in increased exposure of CYP substrates.1,5
  • Monitor for toxicity of concentrations of drugs that are CYP (eg, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4/5) substrates where minimal concentration changes may lead to serious adverse reactions. Adjust the dose of the concomitant CYP (eg, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4/5) substrate drugs as needed.1

CLINICAL DATA - Monumental-1 STUDY

MonumenTAL-1 (MMY1001; NCT03399799, NCT04634552) is a phase 1/2 study of TALVEY in patients with RRMM.6,7

The study was conducted in 3 parts; the primary objectives are listed below2:

  • Part 1 (phase 1; dose escalation): to characterize the safety of TALVEY and determine the RP2Ds and schedule.
  • Part 2 (phase 1; dose expansion): to further characterize the safety of TALVEY at the RP2Ds.
  • Part 3 (phase 2): to evaluate the efficacy of TALVEY at the RP2Ds.

Shown below is the summary of the study design and results from part 3 of the phase-2 portion of the MonumenTAL-1 study.

Study Design/Methods (Phase 2)

Patients were enrolled into 1 of the following 3 cohorts2,8:

  • T-cell redirection (TCR) therapy naive: 0.4 mg/kg subcutaneous (SC) QW, not previously exposed to TCR such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) or bispecific antibodies (BsAbs; prior B-cell maturation antigen [BCMA] antibody-drug conjugate [ADC] allowed).
  • TCR naive: 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W, not previously exposed to TCRs (prior BCMA ADC allowed).
  • Prior TCR: 0.4 mg/kg SC QW or 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W, have been previously exposed to TCRs.
    • Among the prior TCR-exposed cohort, patients were divided based on type of TCR (CAR-T, BsAb or CAR-T and BsAb).
  • Key eligibility criteria (Part 3; Phase 2):
    • Measurable multiple myeloma (MM).8
    • ≥3 prior lines of therapy including a PI, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody.8
    • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0-2.8
  • Key exclusion criteria (Part 3; Phase 2):
    • Prior grade 3 or higher CRS; per Lee criteria 20149 related to any TCR or any prior G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)-targeting therapy.4
    • Received cumulative dose of corticosteroids equivalent to ≥140 mg of prednisone within 14 days prior to study drug (not including premedication).4
  • Primary endpoint: overall response rate (ORR).2
  • Key secondary endpoints: duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics.2
  • Dosing
    • TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg SC QW and 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W treatment dose schedule is based on a 28-day cycle.4
    • Step-up dosing for 0.4 mg/kg SC QW4:
      • Week 1: step-up doses of TALVEY (0.01 mg/kg and 0.06 mg/kg SC).
      • Cycles 1+: TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg SC QW until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
    • Step-up dosing for 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W4:
      • Week 1: step-up doses of TALVEY (0.01 mg/kg, 0.06 mg/kg, and 0.3 mg/kg SC).
      • Cycles 1+: TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
    • Premedications: dexamethasone, acetaminophen, and diphenhydramine were required to be administered for each step-up dose, and for the first full treatment dose of TALVEY.4
    • Patients were required to be hospitalized for at least 48 hours from the start of the injection, for each step-up dose and the first full treatment dose of TALVEY.4

MonumenTAL-1 Study Protocol (Phase 2, Part 3) - Key Exclusion Criteria

  • Prior antitumor therapy prior to the first dose of study drug as follows4:
    • Gene modified adoptive cell therapy (eg, CAR-T, natural killer [NK] cells) within 3 months
    • Targeted therapy, epigenetic therapy, or treatment with an investigational drug or an invasive investigational medical device within 21 days or at least 5 half-lives, whichever is less
    • Monoclonal antibody treatment for MM within 21 days
    • Cytotoxic therapy within 21 days
    • Proteasome inhibitor therapy within 14 days
    • Immunomodulatory agent therapy within 7 days
    • Radiotherapy within 14 days. However, if palliative focal radiation is used, the patient is eligible irrespective of the end date of radiotherapy.
    • 0.4 mg/kg or 0.8 mg/kg dosing, not previously exposed to TCR therapies: exposed to a CAR-T or TCR at any time
    • 0.4 mg/kg or 0.8 mg/kg dosing, previously exposed to TCR therapies: TCR within 3 months

MonumenTAL-1 Study Protocol (Phase 2, Part 3) - Key Prohibited Medications Related to Drug Interactions

  • CYP substrates with narrow therapeutic index should be used with caution for the first 48 hours after administration of the first TALVEY dose and during any events of CRS.4
  • For patients receiving warfarin, investigators should consider switching from warfarin to a different anticoagulant. For patients who cannot switch to a different anticoagulant and who experience CRS, coagulation parameters should be monitored closely during a CRS event and until CRS symptoms resolve.4
  • The use of myeloid growth factors, particularly granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CF), should be avoided during CRS.1

physiologically based pharmacokinetic model - Monumental-1

Willemin et al (2023)5 applied PBPK modelling and simulations to analyze DDIs between TALVEY and other drugs that are substrates of CYP450.

Methods

  • SimCYP v21 was used to perform simulations and assess DDIs, which were verified using in vitro and in vivo literature data.
  • Selected CYP450 substrates were evaluated for the potential of DDIs based on the administration of a single dose of substrate and when minimum (or maximum for CYP1A2) enzymatic activity was reached.
  • Prospective simulations were performed using IL-6 profiles from patients administered TALVEY at the RP2Ds of 0.4 mg/kg QW and 0.8 mg/kg Q2W in the MonumenTAL-1 study either without or prior to administration of tocilizumab (anti-IL-6 receptor) or siltuximab (anti-IL-6).
  • The exposure of substrates of CYP450 enzymes were predicted for 2 IL-6 kinetic profiles by the model: one with a median observed IL-6 serum profile and the second with the highest IL-6 serum concentration (Cmax; to predict the highest DDI risk) measured in patients.
  • Additionally, the time to reach maximum change in CYP450 activity (due to elevated IL6) and return to 80% of CYP450 activity was evaluated using the start of cycle 1 (first full treatment dose) as reference. A cutoff of 80% baseline enzymatic activity was chosen due to low risk of DDI.

Results

PBPK Model Verification

  • The model successfully predicted the transient peak concentration and steady state IL-6 concentration (50 pg/mL). DDIs for CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 substrates observed from literature in the presence of 50 pg/mL IL-6 concentration were well predicted, which provided confidence in the application of the model to assess IL-6 as the perpetrator of these substrates.

PBPK Model Application to Talquetamab RP2Ds

  • In patients who experienced CRS after TALVEY administration, the observed median IL-6 Cmax was 18.4 pg/mL and highest IL-6 Cmax was 213 pg/mL for 0.4 mg/kg QW dosing, and 7.1 pg/mL and 3503 pg/mL for 0.8 mg/kg Q2W dosing, respectively.
  • Predicted exposures of CYP450 substrates at median and highest IL-6 levels are presented in the Table: MonumenTAL-1 Study: Simulated Changes in CYP450 Substrate Exposure and DDI Liability at Observed Systemic Median and Highest Cmax IL-6 Profiles.
    • The model predicted no interaction between IL-6 and CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 substrates at the median IL-6 Cmax for both RP2Ds.
    • The model predicted minimal interaction between IL-6 and CYP1A2 and weak-to-moderate inhibition of CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 substrates at the highest IL-6 Cmax for both RP2Ds.
  • At median IL-6 concentrations, maximum change in exposure of CYP450 substrates occurred in 2-3 days (0.4 mg/kg QW) and in 3 days (0.8 mg/kg Q2W) after the first full treatment dose of TALVEY.
  • The time to return to 80% of baseline CYP450 activity was predicted to be 7 days (0.4 mg/kg QW) and 9 days (0.8 mg/kg Q2W) after the first full treatment dose of TALVEY.

MonumenTAL-1 Study: Simulated Changes in CYP450 Substrate Exposure and DDI Liability at Observed Systemic Median and Highest Cmax IL-6 Profiles5
TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg SC QW Dosea
CYP Substrate
With median IL-6 profileb
With IL-6 profile of patient with highest IL-6 Cmaxc
Cmax ratio,
mean
AUC ratio,
mean
DDI liability
Cmax ratio,
mean
AUC ratio,
mean
DDI liability
Caffeine
(CYP1A2)
0.97
0.89
No interaction
0.95
0.83
No interaction
S-warfarind (CYP2C9)
1.00
1.03
No interaction
1.01
1.21
No interaction
Omeprazole (CYP2C19)
1.07
1.13
No interaction
1.43
2.14
Weak-moderate inhibition
Midazolam (CYP3A4/CYP3A5)
1.07
1.11
No interaction
1.43
1.82
Weak inhibition
Simvastatin (CYP3A4)
1.11
1.13
No interaction
1.80
2.00
Weak-moderate inhibition
Cyclosporined (CYP3A4/CYP3A5)
1.06
1.11
No interaction
1.33
1.83
Weak inhibition
TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W Dosea
CYP Substrate
With median IL-6 profileb
With IL-6 profile of patient
with highest IL-6 Cmaxc

Cmax ratio,
mean
AUC ratio,
mean
DDI liability
Cmax ratio,
mean
AUC ratio,
mean
DDI liability
Caffeine
(CYP1A2)
0.98
0.91
No interaction
0.95
0.82
No interaction
S-warfarind (CYP2C9)
1.00
1.02
No interaction
1.02
1.46
Minimal-weak inhibition
Omeprazole (CYP2C19)
1.04
1.08
No interaction
1.68
3.41
Weak-moderate inhibition
Midazolam (CYP3A4/CYP3A5)
1.04
1.07
No interaction
1.66
2.49
Weak-moderate inhibition
Simvastatin (CYP3A4)
1.07
1.08
No interaction
2.35
2.84
Moderate inhibition
Cyclosporined (CYP3A4/CYP3A5)
1.04
1.07
No interaction
1.49
2.51
Weak-moderate inhibition
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; Cmax, maximum serum concentration; CYP450, cytochrome P450; DDI, drug-drug interaction; IL-6, interleukin-6; QW, once weekly; Q2W, every other week; SC, subcutaneous.
aWith 2–3 step-up doses; 0.01 mg/kg and 0.06 mg/kg (0.4 mg/kg QW), and 0.01 mg/kg, 0.06 mg/kg, and 0.3 mg/kg (0.8 mg/kg Q2W).
bMedian Cmax is 18.4 pg/mL (0.4 mg/kg QW) and 7.07 pg/mL (0.8 mg/kg Q2W).
cHighest Cmax is 213 pg/mL (0.4 mg/kg QW) and 3503 pg/mL (0.8 mg/kg Q2W).
dNarrow therapeutic index.

literature search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File databases (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 09 September 2024.

 

References

1 Data on File. Talquetamab. CCDS. Janssen Research & Development, LLC. EDMS-RIM-620984; version 002; 2023.  
2 Schinke CD, Touzeau C, Minnema MC, et al. Pivotal phase 2 MonumenTAL-1 results of talquetamab, a GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody, for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting; June 2-6, 2023; Chicago, IL/Virtual.  
3 Chari A, Minnema MC, Berdeja JG, et al. Talquetamab, a T-cell-redirecting GPRC5D bispecific antibody for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(24):2232-2244.  
4 Data on File. Talquetamab. Protocol 64407564MMY1001. Janssen Research & Development, LLC. EDMS-RIM-856432; version 22.0; 2021.  
5 Willemin ME, Gong J, Hilder BW, et al. Evaluation of talquetamab drug–drug interaction potential as a result of cytokine release syndrome in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in MonumenTAL-1, using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. Poster presented at: American College of Clinical Pharmacology (ACCP) 2023 Congress; September 10–12, 2023; Bellevue, WA, USA.  
6 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A phase 1, first-in-human, open-label, dose escalation study of talquetamab, a humanized GPRC5D x CD3 bispecific antibody, in subjects with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2024 September 9]. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03399799 NLM Identifier: NCT03399799.  
7 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A phase 1/2, first-in-human, open-label, dose escalation study of talquetamab, a humanized GPRC5D x CD3 bispecific antibody, in subjects with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2024 September 9]. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04634552 NLM Identifier: NCT04634552.  
8 Jakubowiak AJ, Anguille S, Karlin L, et al. Updated results of talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with prior exposure to T-cell redirecting therapies: results of the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 study. Poster presented at: 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 9-12, 2023; San Diego, CA/Virtual.  
9 Lee DW, Gardner R, Porter DL, et al. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome. Blood. 2014;124(2):188-195.