This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

TALVEY - Occurrence and Management of Oral Toxicities and Weight Loss

Last Updated: 02/05/2025

SUMMARY

  • Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.
  • Oral toxicities and weight loss have been reported as adverse events (AEs) in the MonumenTAL-1, MonumenTAL-2, TRIMM-2, and RedirecTT-1 studies.1-6
  • MonumenTAL-1 (MMY1001) is an ongoing, open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of TALVEY in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after ≥3 prior lines of therapy (LOTs), including a proteasome inhibitor (PI), an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody.1,5,7
    • Schinke et al (2024)8 presented efficacy and safety results from a subgroup analysis in Black patients who received TALVEY at the recommended phase 2 doses (RP2Ds) of 0.4 mg/kg subcutaneous (SC) weekly (QW) or 0.8 mg/kg SC every other week (Q2W). Oral AEs and weight loss were reported in Black patients.
    • Rasche et al (2024)9 presented the long-term follow-up efficacy and safety results from the MonumenTAL-1 study at a median follow-up of 29.8 months for the 0.4 mg/kg SC QW cohort, 23.4 months for the 0.8 mg/kg SC once Q2W cohort, and 20.5 months for the prior T-cell redirection (TCR) therapy exposed cohort. Taste-related AEs and taste disorder were reported in the QW, Q2W, and TCR cohorts.
    • Chari et al (2024)10 published the clinical management of AEs in patients with RRMM treated with TALVEY in the MonumenTAL-1 study. Oral AEs were reported in the QW, Q2W, and TCR cohorts.
    • Jakubiak et al (2023)11presented the updated efficacy and safety results in patients with prior TCR, including an additional 19 patients enrolled in the MonumenTAL-1 study since the prior analysis, at a median follow-up of 18.4 months for the overall prior TCR cohort, 18.4 months for the prior chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell cohort, and 16.3 months for the prior bispecific antibody (Bab) cohorts, respectively. Oral AEs and taste disorders were reported in all cohorts.
    • Chari et al (2023)12 presented efficacy and safety results in patients from MonumenTAL-1 who switched to reduced or less frequent dosing with TALVEY. Oral toxicities and weight loss reported in the Prospective Dose Intensity Reduction Cohorts at a median follow-up of 13.2 months are described below.
    • Krishnan et al (2023)13 evaluated the efficacy and safety of TALVEY in key high-risk and prior B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) therapy subgroups of patients from the MonumenTAL-1 study. Oral AEs were reported.
    • Chari et al (2022)5,6 published the safety and efficacy results of TALVEY in the phase 1 portion of the MonumenTAL-1 study. Patients received TALVEY at the first RP2D of 0.405 mg/kg SC QW (median follow-up, 11.7 months), or at the second RP2D of 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W (median follow-up, 4.2 months). Oral AEs and decreased weight were reported in both cohorts.
    • Per MonumenTAL-1 protocol, please see below for management strategies for oral toxicities including dysgeusia, dry mouth and dysphagia.7
  • MonumenTAL-2 (MMY1004) is an ongoing, phase 1b, multi-arm, open-label study evaluating TALVEY in combination with other anticancer therapies in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).14-17 Janssen does not recommend the use of TALVEY in a manner that is inconsistent with the approved labeling.
    • Cohort D is evaluating the efficacy and safety of TALVEY in combination with DARZALEX FASPRO® and lenalidomide in 34 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).
      • Nooka et al (2024)16 presented the initial efficacy and safety results of TALVEY 0.6 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO + lenalidomide cohort at a median follow-up of 13.2 months (range, 10.0-14.6) and TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W) + DARZALEX FASPRO + lenalidomide cohort at a median follow-up of 5.8 months (range, 1.7 [denotes patients who died]-12.0). Taste-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), dry mouth, and weight loss were reported in both cohorts.
    • Cohort E is evaluating the safety and efficacy of TALVEY in combination with pomalidomide in patients with RRMM.17
      • Searle et al (2024)17 presented the updated efficacy and safety results of TALVEY in combination with pomalidomide from the MonumenTAL-2 study at a median follow-up of 16.8 months (range, 1.2-25.1). Taste-related AEs, dry mouth, and weight loss were reported.
  • TRIMM-2 (MMY1002) is an ongoing, phase 1b, multicohort open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of DARZALEX FASPRO in combination with TECVAYLI® or TALVEY with or without pomalidomide in patients with RRMM.3,18,19 Janssen does not recommend the use of TECVAYLI, TALVEY, or DARZALEX FASPRO in a manner that is inconsistent with the approved labeling.
    • Ballis et al (2024)19 presented the efficacy and safety results of the TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg QW + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide and TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide cohorts at a median follow-up of 15.8 months (range, 3.2-37.9) and 17.5 months (range, 0.2-37.7), respectively. Oral AEs and decreased weight were reported in both TALVEY + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide cohorts.
    • Dholaria et al (2023)3 presented the updated efficacy and safety results from the TALVEY + DARZALEX FASPRO cohorts at a median follow-up of 16.8 months for the TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg QW + DARZALEX FASPRO cohort and 15.0 months for the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO cohort. Oral AEs, decreased appetite, and decreased weight were reported in all cohorts.
  • RedirecTT-1 (MMY1003) is an ongoing, open-label, phase 1b/2 evaluating the safety and efficacy of TALVEY and TECVAYLI in patients with RRMM.4,20,21 Janssen does not recommend the use of TALVEY and TECVAYLI in a manner that is inconsistent with the approved labeling.
    • Cohen et al (2024)21 presented the updated efficacy and safety results in the evaluated cohorts, including in patients with extramedullary disease (EMD), at a median follow-up of 20.3 months for the all dose levels cohort and 18.2 months (range, 0.7-27.0) for the TALVEY and TECVAYLI recommended phase 2 regimen (RP2R) cohort. Oral AEs were reported in the all dose levels and RP2R cohorts.
  • Other relevant literature has been identified in addition to the data summarized above.2,22-26
    • Health care provider's considerations for management of oral toxicities.2,25,26 
    • Retrospective descriptive study reported oral toxicities.22 
    • Prospective observational study quantifying the incidence and severity of dysgeusia and xerostomia.23 
    • Retrospective descriptive study reported oral toxicities.24 
    • Patient reported outcomes of oral toxicities.27

PRODUCT LABELING

BACKGROUND

  • G protein-coupled receptor, class C, group 5, member D (GPRC5D) is a 7-segment transmembrane orphan receptor protein that belongs to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors.28 It is predominantly expressed in cells with a plasma-cell phenotype, with higher expression levels on the surface of malignant plasma cells in patients with MM, thereby making it a potential immunotherapeutic target.29-31 It is found to be expressed both as a protein and mRNA in the hard keratinized tissues of the tongue (ie, filiform papillae),32,33 and residential or interstitial plasma cells within the salivary glands and tonsils.32
  • Taste disturbances can be categorized into hypogeusia, ageusia, phantogeusia and dysgeusia. Dysgeusia is commonly used as a general term for any type of taste disorder.34
  • Oral toxicities/taste evaluation can be assessed using the following criteria:
    • National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Per CTCAE, the maximum possible grade of dysgeusia is 2.35
    • Subjective total taste acuity (STTA).36 

CLINICAL DATA - Monumental-1 Study

MonumenTAL-1 (MMY1001; NCT03399799, NCT04634552) is a phase 1/2 study of TALVEY in patients with RRMM.37,38

The study was conducted in 3 parts; the primary objectives are listed below1:

  • Part 1 (phase 1; dose escalation): to characterize the safety of TALVEY and determine the RP2Ds and schedule.
  • Part 2 (phase 1; dose expansion): to further characterize the safety of TALVEY at the RP2Ds.
  • Part 3 (phase 2): to evaluate the efficacy of TALVEY at the RP2Ds.

Study Design/Methods (Phase 2)

Patients were enrolled into 1 of the following 3 cohorts1,11:

  • TCR naïve: 0.4 mg/kg SC QW, not previously exposed to TCR such as Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy or bispecific antibodies (BsAbs; prior BCMA antibody-drug conjugate [ADC] allowed).
  • TCR naïve: 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W, not previously exposed to TCRs (prior BCMA ADC allowed).
  • Prior TCR: 0.4 mg/kg SC QW or 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W, have been previously exposed to TCRs.
    • Among the prior TCR-exposed cohort, patients were divided based on the type of TCR (CAR-T, BsAb or CAR-T and BsAb).
  • Key eligibility criteria (Part 3; Phase 2):
    • Measurable MM.11
    • ≥3 prior LOTs including a PI, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody.11
    • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0-2.11
  • Key exclusion criteria (Part 3; Phase 2):
    • Prior grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome (CRS; per Lee criteria 201439) related to any TCR or any prior GPRC5D-targeting therapy.7
    • Received cumulative dose of corticosteroids equivalent to ≥140 mg of prednisone within 14 days prior to study drug (not including premedication).7
  • Primary endpoint: overall response rate (ORR).1
  • Key secondary endpoints: duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics.1
  • Dosing
    • TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg SC QW and 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W treatment dose schedule is based on a 28-day cycle.7
    • Step-up dosing for 0.4 mg/kg SC QW7:
      • Week 1: step-up doses of TALVEY (0.01 mg/kg and 0.06 mg/kg SC).
      • Cycles 1+: TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg SC QW until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
    • Step-up dosing for 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W7:
      • Week 1: step-up doses of TALVEY (0.01 mg/kg, 0.06 mg/kg, and 0.3 mg/kg SC).
      • Cycles 1+: TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
    • Premedications: dexamethasone, acetaminophen, and diphenhydramine were required to be administered for each step-up dose and for the first full treatment dose of TALVEY.7
    • Patients were required to be hospitalized for at least 48 hours from the start of the injection for each step-up dose and the first full treatment dose of TALVEY.7

Schinke et al (2024)8 presented efficacy and safety results from a subgroup analysis in Black patients who received TALVEY at the RP2Ds of 0.4 mg/kg SC QW or 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W in phase 1/2 of the MonumenTAL-1 study. Results specific to oral-related and weight loss AEs are summarized below.

Results

Treatment Disposition

  • Overall, 29 (10%) Black patients and 254 (86%) White patients from the MonumenTAL-1 study were assessed.
  • The median follow-up was 26 months for the Black subgroup and 31 months for the White subgroup.

Safety


MonumenTAL-1 Study: Summary of Oral-Related and Weight Loss AEs in Black vs White Patients8
AE, n (%)
White
(N=254)

Black
(N=29)
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Dysgeusiaa
178 (70.1)
NA
26 (89.7)
NA
Weight decreased
100 (39.4)
10 (3.9)
15 (51.7)
2 (6.9)
Dry mouth
80 (31.5)
0
11 (37.9)
0
Decreased appetite
60 (23.6)
0
11 (37.9)
0
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; NA, not applicable.Clinical data cutoff date of June 20, 2024.
aIncludes dysgeusia, ageusia, taste disorder, and hypogeusia. Per CTCAE version 4.03, the maximum grade of dysgeusia is 2.


MonumenTAL-1 Study: Characterization of Dysgeusia-Related AEs in Black vs White patients4
AE
White (N=254)
Black (N=29)
Median durationa, days
147.0
183.0
Dose modificationsb, n (%)
14 (5.5)
6 (20.7)
Concomitant medicationsc,n (%)
25 (9.8)
3 (10.3)
Resolvedd, n (%)
123 (56.2)
10 (33.3)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event.
Clinical data cutoff date of June 20, 2024.
aMedian duration is based on events with both start and end time/dates available.
bDose modifications include cycle delays, dose reductions, and skipped doses.
cPatients could receive ≥1 concomitant medication.
dPatients could have ≥1 event. Percentages are calculated with the number of events as the denominator.

Rasche et al (2024)9 presented longer-term follow-up efficacy and safety results from the MonumenTAL-1 study in patients receiving TALVEY at a median follow-up of 29.8 months for the 0.4 mg/kg SC QW cohort, 23.4 months for the 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W cohort, and 20.5 months for the prior TCR cohort. Results specific to oral toxicities and weight loss are summarized below.

Results

Safety

MonumenTAL-1 Study: GPRC5D-Associated Oral AEs9
AE (Any Grade), n (%)
0.4 mg/kg SC QW (n=143)
0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W (n=154)
Prior TCR
(n=78)

Taste relateda
   Total
103 (72.0)
110 (71.4)
59 (75.6)
   Leading to dose reduction
10 (7.0)
6 (3.9)
4 (5.1)
   Leading to discontinuation
0 (0)
3 (1.9)
0 (0)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; GPRC5D, G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D; Q2W, once every other week; QW, weekly; SC, subcutaneous; TCR, T-cell redirection.
Clinical data cutoff date of January 29, 2024.
aIncluding ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, and taste disorder.

MonumenTAL-1 Study: Weight Loss in Patients With Oral Toxicitya in the QW and Q2W Cohorts9

A graph with numbers and lines

Description automatically generated

Abbreviations: C, cycle; D, day; No.; number; Pts, patients; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; SD, step-up dose; SE, standard error.
Clinical data cutoff date of January 29, 2024.
aIncluding dysgeusia, ageusia, taste disorder, hypogeusia, dry mouth, dysphagia, cheilitis, glossitis, glossodynia, mouth ulceration, oral discomfort, oral mucosal erythema, oral pain, stomatitis, swollen tongue, tongue discomfort, tongue erythema, tongue edema, tongue ulceration.

Chari et al (2024)10 published the clinical management of AEs in patients with RRMM treated with TALVEY in the MonumenTAL-1 study. Results specific to oral toxicities and weight loss are summarized below.

Study Design/Methods

  • In the MonumenTAL-1 study, dysgeusia, ageusia (loss of taste), hypogeusia (reduced ability to taste), and general taste disorders were included under the term dysgeusia.
  • Dysgeusia was graded by the CTCAE classification and has a maximum severity grade of 2.
  • Grade 1 is defined as altered taste with no change in diet and grade 2 is defined as altered taste with a change in diet and presence of noxious, unpleasant, or loss of taste.

Results

Safety

A summary of oral AEs associated with TALVEY in MonumenTAL-1 is presented in Table: MonumenTAL-1 Study: Oral AEs Associated With TALVEY.

Dysgeusia
  • Dysgeusia as an AE of any grade was reported in 245 (72%) patients.
    • Some events resolved completely or partially, defined as a reduction in severity from grade 2 to grade 1, while others did not resolve.
    • Dysgeusia can begin shortly after TALVEY dosing, sometimes on the first day or within a few days of step-up dosing.
  • The median duration of dysgeusia was 235.5 days (range, 1-870).
  • Two patients discontinued due to dysgeusia, both in the 0.8 mg/kg Q2W cohort.
Dry Mouth
  • Dry mouth as an AE of any grade was reported in 122 (36%) patients; grade 3/4 events were not observed in any patients.
  • The median total duration that patients experienced dry mouth across all events was 216 days (range, 4-628).
  • No patients discontinued treatment due to dry mouth.
Dysphagia
  • Dysphagia as an AE of any grade was reported in 82 (24%) patients, and grade 3/4 events were observed in 3 (1%) patients.
    • Most dysphagia cases were low grade.
    • Three (2.1%) patients, all in the 0.8 mg/kg Q2W cohort, had grade 3 dysphagia.
  • The median duration of dysphagia was 165.5 days (range, 20-572).
  • No patients discontinued treatment due to dysphagia.

MonumenTAL-1 Study: Oral AEs Associated With TALVEY10
AE (Any Grade)
0.4 mg/kg SC QW (n=143)
0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W (n=145)
Prior TCR
(n=51)

Dysgeusia
   Total events, n (%)
103 (72.0)
103 (71.0)
39 (76.5)
   Grade 1, %
59.2
58.3
66.7
   Concurrent events, %
      Decreased appetite
10.7
11.7
2.6
      Dry mouth
19.4
16.5
20.5
      Weight loss ≥10% from baseline
20.4
15.5
10.3
   Median time to onseta, days
20.0
15.0
12.5
   Median durationb, days
95.0
102.0
130.0
   Resolvedc, n (%)
58 (45.7)
36 (30.8)
17 (37.0)
Dry mouth
   Total events, n (%)
38 (26.6)
58 (40)
26 (51)
   Concurrent events, %
      Decreased appetite
7.9
12.1
15.4
      Dysgeusia
23.7
31.0
38.5
      Dysphagia
5.3
9.0
16.7
      Weight loss ≥10% from baseline
13.2
6.9
11.5
   Median time to onseta, days
26.0
22.0
18.5
   Median durationb, days
57.0
89.0
58.5
   Resolvedc, n (%)
20 (50.0)
20 (31.3)
13 (40.6)
Dysphagia
   Total events, n (%)
34 (23.8)
36 (24.8)
12 (23.5)
   Concurrent events, %
      Decreased appetite
14.7
19.4
8.3
      Dry mouth
17.6
16.7
25
      Weight loss ≥10% from baseline
17.6
19.4
8.3
   Median time to onseta, days
20.5
28.5
27.5
   Median durationb, days
109.0
73.0
174.0
   Resolvedc, n (%)
25 (69.4)
29 (72.5)
4 (33.3)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; TCR, T-cell redirection; SC, subcutaneous.
Clinical data cutoff date of January 17, 2023.
aMedian time to onset calculated relative to the most recent dose received.
bMedian duration is based on events with both start and end time/dates available.
cPatients could have more than 1 event. Percentages are calculated with the number of events as the denominator.

Supportive Measures/Management

  • The MonumenTAL-1 protocol specified that oral events should be managed with mouth rinses, such as salt water or liquid corticosteroids, pain medications, and short courses of oral corticosteroids.
  • Per investigator experience, dose modification was the most effective management strategy for dysphagia, dysgeusia and dry mouth as per the investigator’s experience. See Table: MonumenTAL-1 Study: Dose Modifications for Oral Events for additional details.
  • Concomitant medications were also used to manage dysphagia, dysgeusia and dry mouth in all 3 cohorts. The efficacy of these measures were not formally assessed. See Table: MonumenTAL-1 Study: Most Common Supportive Measures and Concomitant Treatments for Oral AEs for additional details.
Dysgeusia
  • Increased TALVEY exposure led to a higher incidence of dysgeusia.
  • Nutritional monitoring and appropriate supplementation were implemented.
  • High caloric shakes were advised to ensure adequate nutritional intake and prevent weight loss.
  • Increased TALVEY exposure led to a higher incidence of dysgeusia.
  • Patients experiencing weight loss may need adjustments to weight-based medications, including TALVEY, and other conditions like hypotension and diabetes mellitus should be monitored closely.
Dry mouth
  • Increased hydration, intraoral topical agents, and sodium lauryl sulfate-free toothpastes were suggested by investigators to manage dry mouth.
Dysphagia
  • Tramadol and oxycodone were used for pain, while corticosteroids were used to control inflammation.
  • “Magic mouthwash” containing at least 3 of an antihistamine, anesthetic, antacid, antifungal, corticosteroid, or antibiotic was used to manage pain and inflammation.
  • Frequent liquids and artificial saliva were administered for dry mouth-induced dysphagia.

MonumenTAL-1 Study: Dose Modifications for Oral Events10
AE, n (%)
0.4 mg/kg SC QW (n=143)
0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W (n=145)
Prior TCR
(n=51)

Dysgeusia
   Dose modification
12 (8.4)
8 (5.5)
6 (11.8)
      Delayed
0
0 (0)
0 (0)
      Skippeda
7 (4.9)
4 (2.8)
5 (9.8)
      Reducedb
10 (7.0)
5 (3.4)
4 (7.8)
Dry mouth
   Dose modification
2 (1.4)
4 (2.8)
3 (5.9)
      Delayed
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
      Skippeda
2 (1.4)
2 (1.4)
2 (3.9)
      Reducedb
1 (0.7)
3 (2.1)
2 (3.9)
Dysphagia
   Dose modification
2 (1.4)
2 (1.4)
3 (5.9)
      Delayed
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
      Skippeda
2 (1.4)
1 (0.7)
1 (2.0)
      Reducedb
0 (0)
1 (0.7)
2 (3.9)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; TCR, T-cell redirection; SC, subcutaneous.
Clinical data cutoff date of January 17, 2023.
aDefined as patients who had at least 1 dose skip before resuming on the same dosing level and schedule thereafter.
bDefined as changes to either a reduced dose or a less frequent dosing schedule.


MonumenTAL-1 Study: Most Common Supportive Measures and Concomitant Treatments for Oral AEs10
AE, n (%)
0.4 mg/kg SC QW (n=143)
0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W (n=145)
Prior TCR
(n=51)

Dysgeusia
   Local oral concomitant
   medications (≥3 patients in any cohort)a

15 (10.5)
13 (9.0)
5 (9.8)
      Dexamethasone
1 (0.7)
4 (2.8)
2 (3.9)
      Triamcinolone
4 (2.8)
0
0
      Nystatin
0
3 (2.1)
1 (2.0)
Dry mouth
   Local oral concomitant medications
   (≥4 patients in any cohort)a

18 (12.6)
18 (12.4)
11 (21.6)
      Xylitol
6 (4.2)
1 (0.7)
3 (5.9)
      Glycerol
4 (2.8)
0
3 (5.9)
      Glucose oxidase
1 (0.7)
4 (2.8)
2 (3.9)
      Lactoferrin
1 (0.7)
4 (2.8)
2 (3.9)
      Lactoperoxidase
1 (0.7)
4 (2.8)
2 (3.9)
      Lysozyme
1 (0.7)
4 (2.8)
2 (3.9)
      Sorbitol
3 (2.1)
0
4 (7.8)
      Artificial saliva
0
4 (2.8)
0
Dysphagia
   Concomitant medications (≥2 patients
   in any cohort)a

9 (6.3)
11 (7.6)
4 (7.8)
      Sodium bicarbonate
0
4 (2.8)
0
      Sodium chloride
1 (0.7)
2 (1.4)
1 (2.0)
      Fluconazole
1 (0.7)
2 (1.4)
0
      Nutrients
0
2 (1.4)
0
      Omeprazole
0
2 (1.4)
0
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; TCR, T-cell redirection; SC, subcutaneous.
Clinical data cutoff date of January 17, 2023.
aPatients could receive ≥1 concomitant medication.

Jakubowiak et al (2023)11 presented the updated efficacy and safety results in patients with prior TCR, including an additional 19 patients enrolled in the MonumenTAL-1 study since the prior analysis. Results specific to oral toxicities are summarized below.

Results

Treatment Disposition

  • A total of 70 patients with prior TCR were enrolled; 67 patients (95.7%) were exposed to BCMA-targeting TCR.
  • The median duration of follow-up was 18.4 months for the overall prior TCR cohort and the prior CAR-T therapy cohort and 16.3 months for the prior BsAb cohort, respectively.

Safety


MonumenTAL-1 Study: Oral-Related AEs (Prior TCR)11
AE, n (%)
Overall Prior TCR (N=70)
Prior CAR-T Therapy (n=50)
Prior BsAb (n=25)
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Dysgeusiaa
53 (75.7)
NA
36 (72.0)
NA
20 (80.0)
NA
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; BsAb, bispecific antibody; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; NA, not applicable; TCR, T-cell redirection.
aIncluding ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, and taste disorder. Per CTCAE, the maximum possible grade of dysgeusia is 2.

Chari et al (2023)12 presented efficacy and safety results in patients from MonumenTAL-1 who switched to reduced or less frequent dosing with TALVEY. Results specific to oral toxicities and weight loss in Prospective Dose Intensity Reduction Cohorts are summarized below.

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients were divided into Responsive Dose Intensity Reduction Cohorts and Prospective Dose Intensity Reduction Cohorts.
    • Prospective Dose Intensity Reduction Cohorts (n=19):
      • TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W was reduced to 0.4 mg/kg Q2W in 9 patients who had at least partial response (≥PR).
      • TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W was reduced to 0.8 mg/kg once Q4W in 10 patients who had ≥PR.

Results

Treatment Disposition

  • Overall, 19 patients were included in the Prospective Dose Intensity Reduction Cohorts.
  • The median duration of follow-up for patients included in the Prospective Dose Intensity Reduction Cohorts was 13.2 months (range, 4.0±16.1).

Safety

MonumenTAL-1 Study: Prospective Cohorts With Change in Oral Toxicity and Weight Loss After Switch vs Matched Cohort Without Dose Reductiona,12

Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; DR, dose reduction; PR, partial response.
Clinical data cutoff date of October 2, 2023.
aPatients included had ≥PR before day 200 from the prospective dose intensity reduction cohorts (n=18) and from the MonumenTAL-1 cohort who did not dose reduce (n=206). Each category shows only patients who had a respective AE on day 100. Color signifies how that respective AE grade changed from day 100 to last day of follow-up (within 30 days of last treatment; capped at 500 days).

Krishnan et al (2023)13 evaluated the efficacy and safety of TALVEY in key high-risk and prior BCMA therapy subgroups of patients from the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 study. Results specific to oral-related AEs are summarized below.

Results

Treatment Disposition

  • Overall, 143 patients in the 0.4 mg/kg SC QW cohort and 145 patients in the 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W cohort were included in the subgroup analyses.
    • Subgroups of patients with high-risk features included ≥75 years of age, high-risk cytogenetics (del[17p], t[4;14], and/or t[14;16]), International Staging System (ISS) stage III, renal impairment (baseline function ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2), triple-class refractory (to a PI, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody), and EMD ≥1 (including soft tissue plasmacytomas).
    • Subgroups of patients with prior BCMA therapies included TCR-naïve BCMA ADC exposed in the 0.4 mg/kg SC QW TALVEY dose, TCR-naïve BCMA ADC exposed in the 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W TALVEY dose, and TCR-exposed (includes BCMA ADC, BCMA CAR-T, and BCMA BsAb) QW and Q2W dosing.

Safety


MonumenTAL-1 Study: Summary of Oral-related AEs in High-risk Subgroups13
TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg SC QW Dose
AE, n (%)
Overall (N=143)
Age ≥75 Years (n=21)
Renal Impairment (n=40)
High-Risk Cytogenetics (n=41)
ISS Stage III (n=28)
EMD (n=33)
Triple-Class Refractory (n=106)
Median follow-up
18.8
18.7
19.5
19.2
18.5
18.4
18.7
Dysgeusiaa
103 (72.0)
15 (71.4)
27 (67.5)
29 (70.7)
13 (46.4)
17 (51.5)
75 (70.8)
TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W Dose
AE, n (%)
Overall (N=145)
Age ≥75 Years (n=32)
Renal Impairment (n=45)
High-Risk Cytogenetics (n=37)
ISS Stage III (n=35)
EMD (n=37)
Triple-Class Refractory (n=100)
Median follow-up
12.7
11.9
13.0
12.5
13.3
12.1
12.8
Dysgeusiaa
103 (71.0)
25 (78.1)
30 (66.7)
25 (67.6)
22 (62.9)
25 (67.6)
66 (66.0)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; EMD, extramedullary disease; ISS, International Staging System; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; SC, subcutaneous.
Clinical data cutoff date of January 17, 2023.
aIncludes ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, and taste disorder.
Note: These AEs were assessed per CTCAE v4.03. Per CTCAE, the maximum possible grade of dysgeusia is 2.


MonumenTAL-1 Study: Summary of Oral-Related AEs in Prior BCMA Subgroups13
AE, n (%)
Prior BCMA
TCR Naïve (BCMA ADC Allowed) 0.4 mg/kg SC QW (n=22)
TCR Naïve (BCMA ADC Allowed) 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W (n=16)
TCR Exposed (BCMA ADC Allowed, CAR-T, BsAb)
QW & Q2W (n=48)
Dysgeusiaa
15 (68.2)
9 (56.3)
36 (75.0)
Abbreviations: ADC, antibody-drug conjugate; AE, adverse event; BCMA, B-cell maturation antigen; BsAb, bispecific antibody; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; SC, subcutaneous; TCR, T-cell redirection.
Clinical data cutoff date of January 17, 2023.
aIncludes ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, and taste disorder.
Note: These AEs were assessed per CTCAE v4.03. Per CTCAE, the maximum possible grade of dysgeusia is 2.

Chari et al (2022)5 published the efficacy and safety results from the phase 1 portion of the MonumenTAL-1 study. Results specific to oral toxicities and weight loss are summarized below.

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients received TALVEY at a dose of 0.0005-0.18 mg/kg intravenous (IV) QW or Q2W, at the first RP2D of 0.405 mg/kg SC QW, or at the second RP2D of 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W.
  • Additional IV and SC doses were evaluated in order to determine the RP2Ds.

Results

Treatment Disposition

  • Overall, 30 patients were included in the 0.405 mg/kg SC QW cohort and 44 patients in the 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W cohort.
  • The median duration of follow-up was 11.7 months (range, 1.0-21.2) for the 0.405 mg/kg SC QW cohort and 4.2 months (range, 0.7-13.7) for the 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W cohort.

Safety


MonumenTAL-1 (Phase 1) Study: Oral-Related and Weight Loss AEs5
AEa, n (%)
0.405 mg/kg SC QW (n=30)
0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W (n=44)
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Dysgeusia
19 (63)
NA
25 (57)
NA
Dry mouth
9 (30)
0
25 (57)
0
Decreased weight
9 (30)
0
14 (32)
1 (2)
Dysphagia
11 (37)
0
12 (27)
0
Decreased appetite
6 (20)
1 (3)
9 (20)
0
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; NA, not available; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; SC, subcutaneous.
aAny grade AEs reported in at least 15% of patients.
Note: These AEs were assessed per CTCAE v4.03.

MonumenTAL-1 Study Protocol (Part 3) - Description and Management of Oral Toxicities7

  • Oral toxicity can manifest as dysgeusia, dry mouth, and dysphagia.
  • Oral toxicities are often low grade, and weight loss can occur over time.
  • Initial workup may include evaluation for active infections (eg, herpes simplex virus [HSV], thrush) with appropriate treatment.
  • Symptomatic management can include mouth rinses (salt water, steroid liquid formulations), nutrition consult, pain management as indicated, and possibly a short course of oral steroids in consultation with sponsor.
  • Refractory symptoms may require further evaluation by an ear, nose and throat, or gastrointestinal specialist.

CLINICAL DATA - Monumental-2 study

MonumenTAL-2 (MMY1004; clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05050097) is an ongoing, phase 1b, multi-arm, open-label study evaluating TALVEY in combination with other anticancer therapies in patients with MM.14-17Summarized below are the oral toxicities and weight loss TEAEs in Cohorts D and Cohort E.

Study Design/Methods

  • Key eligibility criteria:
    • Cohort D: measurable MM, NDMM, ECOG PS of 0-1, and transplant ineligible or not intended for transplant.15,16
    • Cohort E: measurable MM, ≥2 prior LOTs, including a PI and an immunomodulatory drug, ECOG PS of 0-1, prior pomalidomide and prior TCR (CAR-T and BsAb) permitted, and no prior GPRC5D-targeted therapy.15,17
  • Primary endpoint for Cohort D and Cohort E: safety; AEs assessed per CTCAE v5.0, except for CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, which were graded per American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) guidelines.15-17

Cohort D

Nooka et al (2024)16 presented the initial efficacy and safety results of the TALVEY 0.6 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO + lenalidomide and TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q4W + DARZALEX FASPRO + lenalidomide cohorts from the MonumenTAL-2 study. Results specific to oral toxicities and weight loss TEAEs are summarized below.

Results

Treatment Disposition

  • A total of 8 patients were included in the TALVEY 0.6 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO + lenalidomide cohort and 26 patients were included in the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q4W + DARZALEX FASPRO + lenalidomide cohort.
  • The median follow-up was 13.2 months (range, 10.0-14.6) for the TALVEY 0.6 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO + lenalidomide cohort and 5.8 months (range, 1.7 [denotes patients who died]-12.0) for the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q4W + DARZALEX FASPRO + lenalidomide cohort.

Safety


MonumenTAL-2 Study (Cohort D): Summary of Oral Toxicities and Weight Loss TEAEs16
TEAE, n (%)
TALVEY 0.6 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO +
Lenalidomide
(n=8)

TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q4W +
DARZALEX FASPRO +
Lenalidomide
(n=26)

Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Taste-relateda
8 (100.0)
0
24 (92.3)
1 (3.8)
Dry mouth
5 (62.5)
0
12 (46.2)
0
Weight decreased
2 (25.0)
0
11 (42.3)
1 (3.8)
Abbreviations: CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; Q2W, every other week; Q4W, every 4 weeks; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.
Clinical data cutoff date of September 23, 2024.
aIncludes dysgeusia, ageusia, taste disorder, and hypogeusia. Per CTCAE version 5.0, the maximum grade of dysgeusia was 2.

Searle et al (2024)17 presented the updated efficacy and safety results of TALVEY in combination with pomalidomide from the MonumenTAL-2 study. Results specific to oral toxicities and weight loss are summarized below.

Results

Treatment Disposition

  • Overall, the median age was 65.0 years. High-risk cytogenetics were noted in 39.1% of patients and 14.3% of patients had EMD.
  • The median follow-up was 16.8 months (range, 1.2-25.1).
  • Prior treatments included the following: CAR-T (8.6%), BsAb (2.9%), anti-CD38 antibody (74.3%) and pomalidomide (22.9%).

Safety

  • Oral toxicity and weight loss reported at a data cutoff date of April 22, 2024, are summarized in Table: MonumenTAL-2 (Cohort E) Study: Summary of Oral Toxicity and Weight Loss.
  • In patients with or without oral toxicities, weight loss was evident early but stabilized and improved over time, with a gradual improvement noted in patients with oral toxicities.

MonumenTAL-2 (Cohort E) Study: Summary of Oral Toxicity and Weight Loss17
AE, n (%)
All Patients (N=35)
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Taste relateda
30 (85.7)
0
Dry mouth
19 (54.3)
0
Weight loss
9 (25.7)
2 (5.7)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
Clinical data cutoff date of April 22, 2024.
aIncludes dysgeusia, ageusia, taste disorder, and hypogeusia. Per CTCAE v5.0, the maximum grade of dysgeusia is 2.

CLINICAL DATA - TRIMM-2 STUDY

TRIMM-2 (MMY1002; clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04108195) is an ongoing, phase 1b, 2-part, multicohort, open-label study evaluating DARZALEX FASPRO regimens in combination with bispecific TCR antibodies with or without pomalidomide in patients with RRMM.3,18,19

Study Design/Methods

  • Key eligibility criteria3:
    • Double refractory to a PI and an immunomodulatory drug or received ≥3 prior lines of treatment (including a PI and an immunomodulatory drug).
    • Treatment with an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (>90 days prior allowed) including anti-CD38 refractory patients.
    • Prior BsAb and CAR-T were allowed.
  • Key primary endpoints3:
    • Part 1: identify the RP2D for each treatment combination.
    • Part 2: safety and tolerability at the selected RP2D of each treatment combination.
    • Antitumor activity.

Bahlis et al (2024)19 presented the efficacy and safety results of the TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg QW + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide and TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide cohorts at a median follow-up of 15.8 months (range, 3.2-37.9) and 17.5 months (range, 0.2-37.7), respectively. Results specific to oral toxicities and weight loss are summarized below.

Study Design/Methods

  • Dosing:
    • TALVEY: 2-3 SUDs before receiving the first full doses of either 0.4 mg/kg SC QW or 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W.
      • The dose frequency could be reduced from QW to Q2W after cycle 4 if patients achieved PR and from Q2W to Q4W after cycle 8 if they achieved very good partial response (VGPR).
    • DARZALEX FASPRO 1800 mg SC: cycles 1-2, QW; cycles 3-6, Q2W; cycles 7+, Q4W.
    • Pomalidomide 2 mg PO: Starting cycle 2. The dosage may be lowered due to hematologic AEs.

Results

Treatment Disposition

  • Overall, 18 patients were included in the TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg QW + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide cohort and 59 patients were included in the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide cohort.
  • The median duration of follow-up was 15.8 months (range, 3.2-37.9) for the TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg QW + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide cohort and 17.5 months (range, 0.2-37.7) for the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide cohort.

Safety


TRIMM-2 Study (TALVEY + DARZALEX FASPRO + Pomalidomide Cohort): Oral-Related and Weight Loss AEs19
AEa, n (%)
Tal 0.4 mg/kg QW + Dara + Pom (n=18)
Tal 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + Dara+ Pom (n=59)
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Oral AEsb
18 (100.0)
0 (0)
50 (84.7)
4 (6.8)
Weight decreased ≥ 10%
12 (66.7)
2 (11.1)
29 (49.2)
10 (16.9)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; Dara, DARZALEX FASPRO; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; Pom; pomalidomide; Tal, TALVEY.
Clinical data cutoff date of July 29, 2024.
aAEs were graded by CTCAE v5.0
bOral AEs include dysgeusia, ageusia, taste disorder, hypogeusia, dry mouth, dysphagia, cheilitis, glossitis, glossodynia, mouth ulceration, oral discomfort, oral mucosal erythema, oral pain, stomatitis, swollen tongue, tongue discomfort, tongue erythema, tongue edema, and tongue ulceration. As per CTCAE, the maximum grade for dysgeusia, which is a part of oral AEs, is 2. Dysgeusia (preferred term) occurred in 88.9% of patients in the TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg QW+ DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide and in 76.3% of patients in the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide cohort.

Dholaria et al (2023)3 presented the updated results of the TRIMM-2 study. Results specific to oral toxicities are summarized below.

Study Design/Methods

  • Dosing:
    • TALVEY: 1-3 SUDs within 1 week before receiving the full doses of either 0.4 mg/kg SC QW or 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W.
      • The dose frequency of TALVEY could be reduced from QW to Q2W after 4 cycles if patients achieved PR and further from Q2W to Q4W after 8 cycles if they achieved VGPR.
    • DARZALEX FASPRO 1800 mg SC: cycles 1-2, QW; cycles 3-6, Q2W; cycles 7+, Q4W.

Results

Treatment Disposition

  • Overall, 14 patients were included in the TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg QW + DARZALEX FASPRO 1800 mg Q4W cohort and 51 patients in the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO 1800 mg Q4W cohort.
  • The median duration of follow-up was 16.8 months (range, 1.9-31.0) for the TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg QW + DARZALEX FASPRO 1800 mg Q4W cohort and 15.0 months (range, 1.0-23.3) for the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO 1800 mg Q4W cohort.

Safety

  • AEs related to oral toxicities and weight loss are summarized in the Table: TRIMM-2 Study: Oral-Related and Weight Loss AEs.
  • Dysgeusia was reported in 76.9% of patients, 6.2% required TALVEY dose reduction.
  • Dysgeusia and dry mouth were managed with mouth washes, saliva stimulants, or dose modifications.

TRIMM-2 Study: Oral-Related and Weight Loss AEs3
AEa, n (%)
Tal 0.4 mg/kg SC QW + Dara
(n=14)

Tal 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W + Dara (n=51)
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Oral AEsb
12 (85.7)
0 (0)
46 (90.2)
2 (3.9)
Decreased appetite
4 (28.6)
1 (7.1)
17 (33.3)
1 (2.0)
Weight decreased
7 (50.0)
0 (0)
14 (27.5)
0 (0)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; Dara, DARZALEX FASPRO; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; SC, subcutaneous; Tal, TALVEY.
Clinical data cutoff date of April 6, 2023.
aAny grade AEs reported in at least 25% of patients.
bIncludes dysgeusia, dry mouth, stomatitis, ageusia, hypogeusia, and taste disorder.

CLINICAL DATA - redirectt-1 STUDY - tAlvey + tecvayli COHORT

RedirecTT-1 (MMY1003; clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04586426) is an ongoing, open-label, phase 1b/2 study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the combination of TALVEY and TECVAYLI in patients with RRMM.4,20,21

Study Design/Methods

  • Key inclusion criteria: relapsed or refractory or intolerant to established therapies including the last line of therapy; prior exposure to a PI, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody.4
  • Primary endpoints: safety, identify RP2R(s), and schedule.4
  • Dosing: eligible patients received varying dose levels of TALVEY and TECVAYLI to determine the RP2R dose and schedule of the combination.4
    • All dose levels: Five varying dose levels of TALVEY and TECVAYLI.
    • RP2R: TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W plus TECVAYLI 3.0 mg/kg SC Q2W.

Cohen et al (2024)21 presented the updated efficacy and safety results for the all dose levels cohort and the TALVEY and TECVAYLI RP2R cohort in the RedirecTT-1 study, including in patients with EMD. Results specific to oral toxicities are summarized below.

Results

Treatment Disposition

  • Overall, 94 patients were included in the all dose levels cohort and 44 patients were in the RP2R cohort.
  • The median duration of follow-up was 20.3 months for the all dose levels cohort and 18.2 months (range, 0.7-27.0) for the RP2R cohort.

Safety


RedirecTT-1 Study: Oral-Related AEs21
AEa, n (%)
All Dose Levels
(N=94)

RP2R
(n=44)

Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Taste changesb
61 (64.9)
NA
22 (50.0)
NA
Dry mouth
40 (42.6)
0 (0)
18 (40.9)
0 (0)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Clinical data cutoff date of March 15, 2024.
aAEs were graded per CTCAE v5.0.
bIncludes ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, and taste disorder per CTCAE; the maximum grade for taste changes is 2 per CTCAE.

literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File databases (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 09 January 2025.

 

References

1 Schinke CD, Touzeau C, Minnema MC, et al. Pivotal phase 2 MonumenTAL-1 results of talquetamab, a GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody, for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting; June 2-6, 2023; Chicago, IL/Virtual.  
2 Shenoy S, Leahey S, Catamero D, et al. Management considerations for oral toxicities associated with talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: experience in monumenTAL-1. Poster presented at: The 49th Annual Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) Congress; April 24-28, 2024; Washington, DC.  
3 Dholaria B, Weisel K, Mateos M, et al. Talquetamab + daratumumab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: updated TRIMM-2 results. Oral presentation presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting; June 2-6, 2023; Chicago, IL, USA & Virtual.  
4 Cohen Y, Morillo D, Gatt M, et al. First results from the RedirecTT-1 study with teclistamab + talquetamab simultaneously targeting BCMA and GPRC5D in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Oral presentation presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting; June 2-6, 2023; Chicago, IL, USA & Virtual.  
5 Chari A, Minnema MC, Berdeja JG, et al. Talquetamab, a T-cell-redirecting GPRC5D bispecific antibody for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(24):2232-2244.  
6 Chari A, Minnema MC, Berdeja JG, et al. Supplement to: Talquetamab, a T-cell-redirecting GPRC5D bispecific antibody for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(24):2232-2244.  
7 Data on File. Talquetamab. Protocol 64407564MMY1001. Janssen Research & Development, LLC. EDMS-RIM-856432; version 22.0; 2021.  
8 Schinke C, Morgan G, Costa LJ, et al. Clinical outcomes in Black patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma following talquetamab treatment: analyses from the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 study. Poster presented at: The 66th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 7-10, 2024; San Diego, CA.  
9 Rasche L, Schinke C, Touzeau C, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety results from the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 study of talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Poster presented at: The European Hematology Association (EHA) 2024 Hybrid Congress; June 13-16, 2024; Madrid, Spain.  
10 Chari A, Krishnan A, Rasche L, et al. Clinical management of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with talquetamab. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24(10):665-693.e14.  
11 Jakubowiak AJ, Anguille S, Karlin L, et al. Updated results of talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with prior exposure to T-cell redirecting therapies: results of the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 study. Poster presented at: The 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 9-12, 2023; San Diego, CA/Virtual.  
12 Chari A, Oriol A, Krishnan A, et al. Efficacy and safety of less frequent/lower intensity dosing of talquetamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results from the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 study. Oral Presentation presented at: The 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 9-12, 2023; San Diego, CA.  
13 Krishnan A, Costa L, Schinke C, et al. Talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: efficacy and safety of patient subgroups from MonumenTAL-1. Poster presented at: The 20th International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting and Exposition; September 27-30, 2023; Athens, Greece.  
14 Matous J, Biran N, Perrot A, et al. Talquetamab + pomalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: safety and preliminary efficacy results from the phase 1b MonumenTAL-2 study. Oral Presentation presented at: 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 9-12, 2023; San Diego, CA.  
15 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A multi-arm phase 1b study of talquetamab with other anticancer therapies in participants with multiple myeloma. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2025 January 9]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05050097 NLM Identifier: NCT05050097.  
16 Nooka AK, Cochrane T, D’Souza A, et al. Talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in combination with daratumumab and lenalidomide in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: safety and efficacy results from the phase 1b MonumenTAL-2 study. Poster presented at: The 66th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 7-10, 2024; San Diego, CA.  
17 Searle E, Quach H, Biran N, et al. Talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in combination with pomalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: efficacy and safety results from the phase 1b monumenTAL-2 study. Poster presented at: The European Hematology Association (EHA) Annual Meeting; June 13-16, 2024; Madrid, Spain.  
18 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A phase 1b study of subcutaneous daratumumab regimens in combination with bispecific T cell redirection antibodies for the treatment of subjects with multiple myeloma. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2025 January 9]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04108195 NLM Identifier: NCT04108195.  
19 Bahlis N, van de Donk NWCJ, Reece D, et al. Talquetamab + daratumumab + pomalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Results from the phase 1b TRIMM2 study. Oral Presentation presented at: 21st International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting; September 25-28, 2024; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.  
20 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A phase 1b/2 dose escalation and expansion study of the combination of the bispecific T cell redirection antibodies talquetamab and teclistamab in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2025 January 9]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04586426 NLM Identifier: NCT04586426.  
21 Cohen YC, Magen H, Gatt M, et al. Talquetamab + teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: updated phase 1b results from RedirecTT-1 with >1 year of follow-up. Oral Presentation presented at: 21st International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting; September 25-28, 2024; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.  
22 Lery M, Perrot A, Ortiz-Brugués A, et al. Dermatological toxicities induced by T-cell-redirecting G protein-coupled receptor family C class 5 member D bispecific antibody talquetamab [abstract]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;90(2):376-377.  
23 Laheij AMGA, Donk NWCJ van de. Characterization of dysgeusia and xerostomia in patients with multiple myeloma treated with the T-cell redirecting GPRC5D bispecific antibody talquetamab. Support Care Cancer. 2024;32(1):20.  
24 Naqvi S, Shrestha A, Alzubi M, et al. Weight loss and dysgeusia in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients treated with talquetamab. eJHaem. 2024.  
25 Catamero D, Purcell K, Ray C, et al. Practical management of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma receiving talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody: Experience in MonumenTAL-1. Poster presented at: The 20th International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting Nurse Symposium; September 27-30, 2023; Athens, Greece.  
26 Schinke C, Dhakal B, Mazzoni S, et al. Real-world experience with clinical management of talquetamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study of US healthcare providers. Curr Méd Res Opin. 2024;40(10):1705-1711.  
27 Popat R, Greenwood A, Wilson W, et al. Oral symptom assessment using patient reported outcomes (PRO) for relapsed multiple myeloma patients treated with Talquetamab. Abstract presented at: 21st International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting; September 25-28, 2024; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.  
28 Bräuner-Osborne H, Jensen A, Sheppard P, et al. Cloning and characterization of a human orphan family C G-protein coupled receptor GPRC5D. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1518(3):237-248.  
29 Kodama T, Kochi Y, Nakai W, et al. Anti-GPRC5D/CD3 bispecific T-cell-redirecting antibody for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2019;18(9):1555-1564.  
30 Atamaniuk J, Gleiss A, Porpaczy E, et al. Overexpression of G protein-coupled receptor 5D in the bone marrow is associated with poor prognosis in patients with multiple myeloma. Eur J Clin Invest. 2012;42(9):953-960.  
31 Verkleij C, Broekmans M, Duin M. Preclinical activity and determinants of response of the GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody talquetamab in multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2021;5(8):2196-2215.  
32 Goldsmith R, Cornax I, Ma J, et al. Normal human tissue expression of G protein–coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D), a promising novel target for multiple myeloma, is restricted to plasma cells and hard keratinized tissues. Poster presented at: 18th International Myeloma Workshop of the International Myeloma Society; September 8-11, 2021; Vienna, Austria.  
33 Inoue S, Nambu T, Shimomura T. The RAIG family member, GPRC5D, is associated with hard-keratinized structures. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;122(3):565-573.  
34 Epstein J, Silva S de AE, Epstein G, et al. Taste disorders following cancer treatment: report of a case series. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(12):4587-4595.  
35 National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. 2017 - [cited 2025 January 9]. Available from: https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_8.5x11.pdf
36 Epstein JB, Barasch A. Taste disorders in cancer patients: Pathogenesis, and approach to assessment and management. Oral Oncol. 2010;46(2):77-81.  
37 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A phase 1, first-in-human, open-label, dose escalation study of talquetamab, a humanized GPRC5D x CD3 bispecific antibody, in subjects with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2025 January 9]. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03399799 NLM Identifier: NCT03399799.  
38 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A phase 1/2, first-in-human, open-label, dose escalation study of talquetamab, a humanized GPRC5D x CD3 bispecific antibody, in subjects with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2025 January 9]. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04634552 NLM Identifier: NCT04634552.  
39 Lee DW, Gardner R, Porter DL, et al. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome. Blood. 2014;124(2):188-195.