This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.
SUMMARY
- Janssen does not recommend any practices, procedures or practice guidelines that deviate from the product labeling or are not approved the by regulatory agencies.
- MajesTEC-1 (MMY1001) is an ongoing, phase 1/2, multicohort study evaluating the safety and efficacy of TECVAYLI in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).1,2
- Cohort A (triple-class exposed) included 165 patients with RRMM who were triple-class exposed to a proteasome inhibitor (PI), an immunomodulatory drug and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody.1
- Cohort C included 40 patients with RRMM, previously treated with a PI, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. All patients enrolled in Cohort C had prior exposure to B-cell maturation (BCMA)-targeted therapies. Janssen does not recommend the use of TECVAYLI in a manner inconsistent with the approved labeling.2
- Willemin et al (2024)3 conducted a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) analysis to evaluate potential drug-drug interactions due to cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzyme inhibition by cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients administered TECVAYLI at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in the MajesTEC-1 study.
- The PBPK model suggested the risk of a drug-drug interaction was highest during step-up dosing up until about 7 days after the first treatment dose, and during/after CRS.
- At high IL-6 levels, a modest CYP450 inhibition for omeprazole and simvastatin, weak inhibition for midazolam and cyclosporine, and minimal inhibition for caffeine and s-warfarin was observed.
CLINICAL DATA - MAJESTEC-1 STUDY
MajesTEC-1 (MMY1001; clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT03145181; NCT04557098) is evaluating the safety and efficacy results of TECVAYLI in patients with RRMM after ≥3 prior lines of therapy, including triple-class exposure to a PI, an immunomodulatory drug and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody.1,2
Study Design/Methods
The main objectives are as follows: Part 1 (dose escalation) to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for TECVAYLI; Part 2 (dose expansion) to distinguish safety and tolerability of TECVAYLI at the RP2D; Part 3 (the phase 2 component) to evaluate the efficacy of TECVAYLI at the RP2D.1,2
- Key eligibility criteria for Cohort A (triple-class exposed): measurable multiple myeloma, RRMM, ≥3 prior lines of treatment including a PI, an immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, no prior B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted therapy use.1
- Key eligibility criteria for Cohort C: ≥3 prior lines of therapy, prior PI, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 antibody, enrolled patients who had prior exposure to BCMA-targeted treatment (chimeric antigen receptor [CAR]-T cell and/or antibody drug conjugate [ADC]).2
- Dosing: week 1: step-up doses of TECVAYLI (0.06 mg/kg and 0.3mg/kg subcutaneously [SC]). The step-up doses were administered 2-4 days apart and completed 2-4 days prior to the 1st full treatment dose of TECVAYLI (1.5 mg/kg SC). Cycle 1+: TECVAYLI 1.5mg/kg SC weekly until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, death or the end of study.1,2
- Primary endpoint: overall response rate.1,2
MajesTEC-1 Study Protocol - Key Prohibited Medications Related to Drug Interactions
The following medications were prohibited during the study:
- Cytochrome P450 substrates with a narrow therapeutic index should have been used with caution during a CRS event and from the start of step-up doses to 7 days after the first treatment dose of TECVAYLI was administered.4
- For patients who received warfarin (or other vitamin K antagonists), investigators should have considered switching from warfarin (or other vitamin K antagonists) to a different anticoagulant. For patients who could not be switched to a different anticoagulant and who experienced CRS, coagulation parameters should have been monitored closely during a CRS event and until CRS symptoms resolved.4
physiologically based pharmacokinetic model - Majestec-1 STUDY
Willemin et al (2024)3 applied PBPK modelling and simulations to analyze drug-drug interactions between TECVAYLI and other drugs that were substrates of CYP450.
Methods
- A literature-based PBPK model was developed using observed IL-6 plasma concentrations (Cmax). Prospective simulations were performed using observed IL-6 data from 112 patients administered TECVAYLI at the RP2D in the MajesTEC-1 study either without or prior to administration of tocilizumab (an anti-IL-6 agent).
- The exposure of substrates of CYP450 enzymes were predicted for 2 IL-6 kinetic profiles by the model: one with a mean IL-6 concentration per time event up to cycle 1 day 15 with mean Cmax=21 pg/mL, and the second with the highest individual observed concentration of IL-6 (288 pg/mL) among all patients occurring during cycle 1 before administration of any tocilizumab. Simulations for both scenarios included 10 trials of 75 subjects (aged 20-50 years, 50% female).
- The following CYP450 substrates were evaluated for the potential of drug-drug interactions:
- CYP1A2: caffeine
- CYP2C9: s-warfarin
- CYP2C19: omeprazole
- CYP3A4/CYP3A5: midazolam and cyclosporine
- CYP3A4: simvastatin
- Additionally, the time to reach maximum change in CYP450 activity (due to IL-6) and return to 80% of baseline enzymatic activity was estimated, with the start of step-up dosing in cycle 1 as the reference. A cut-off of 80% was chosen, since the impact on exposures was considered low.
Results
PBPK Model Verification
- The model captured the peak and steady state (50 pg/mL) plasma concentrations of IL-6. Drug-drug interactions of substrates were calculated at 50 pg/mL of IL-6 using data derived from literature. The predicted Cmax and AUC ratios for each of CYP substrates that were studied met the predefined success criteria.
PBPK Model Application to TECVAYLI RP2D
- Of the 112 patients who experienced CRS after administration of TECVAYLI at RP2D, the mean IL-6 Cmax was 21 pg/mL, with a highest IL-6 Cmax of 288 pg/mL before any administration of tocilizumab.
- Predicted exposures of CYP450 substrates at mean and maximum IL-6 levels are presented in the table: Simulated Change in CYP450 Substrate Exposure After Single Dose Administration of CYP450 Substrate in Presence of IL-6 Kinetics in MajesTEC-1.
- Using scenario 1 with the mean Cmax of 21 pg/mL, the model predicted limited changes in exposure for caffeine, s-warfarin, omeprazole, midazolam, cyclosporine, and simvastatin (mean area under the curve [AUC] ratio, 0.87-1.20) at the IL-6 Cmax of 21 pg/mL.
- Using scenario 2 with the highest IL-6 Cmax of 288 pg/mL, the impact on exposure was predicted to be moderate for omeprazole and simvastatin (mean AUC ratio= 2.23 and 2.09 respectively), weak for midazolam and cyclosporine (mean AUC ratio=1.90), and minimal for caffeine and s-warfarin (mean AUC ratio=0.82 and 1.25, respectively).
- Predicted enzyme activity for 2 IL-6 kinetic profiles are shown in the Table: Predicted Enzyme Activity for Two IL-6 Kinetic Profiles in MajesTEC-1 and Corresponding Time with Start of Cycle 1.
- Using scenario 1 (mean IL-6 profile), the highest maximum level of CYP activity was for caffeine (CYP1A2) at 118%, and the lowest was for omeprazole (CYP2C19) at 87%. After the start of cycle 1, the maximum difference was seen at 65-82 hours (3 days).
- Using scenario 2 (highest IL-6 profile), the highest maximum was for caffeine (CYP1A2) at 128% and the lowest was for omeprazole (CYP2C19) at 56%. After the start of cycle 1, the maximum difference was seen at 75-105 hours (3-4 days).
- In the profile with the highest IL-6 Cmax (288 pg/mL) CYP450 activity returned to 80% of the baseline enzymatic activity approximately 7-8 days after the start of cycle 1.
Simulated Change in CYP450 Substrate Exposure After Single Dose Administration of CYP450 Substrate in Presence of IL-6 Kinetics in MajesTEC-133
|
|
|
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---|
Caffeine (CYP1A2)
| 0.97 (0.96-0.97)
| 0.87 (0.84-0.90)
| No interaction
| 0.95 (0.94-0.96)
| 0.82 (0.79-0.85)
| No interaction
|
s-warfarin (CYP2C9)
| 1.00 (1.00-1.00)
| 1.05 (1.05-1.06)
| No inhibition
| 1.01 (1.01-1.02)
| 1.25 (1.22-1.29)
| Weak inhibition
|
Omeprazole (CYP2C19)
| 1.10 (1.09-1.12)
| 1.20 (1.17-1.30)
| No inhibition
| 1.45 (1.39-1.50)
| 2.23 (2.06-2.52)
| Moderate inhibition
|
Midazolam (CYP3A4/CYP3A5)
| 1.11 (1.10-1.11)
| 1.17 (1.15-1.18)
| No inhibition
| 1.46 (1.43-1.49)
| 1.90 (1.79-1.99)
| Weak inhibition
|
Simvastatin (CYP3A4)
| 1.17 (1.16-1.19)
| 1.20 (1.18-1.22)
| No inhibition
| 1.86 (1.78-1.92)
| 2.09 (1.95-2.18)
| Moderate inhibition
|
Cyclosporine (CYP3A4/CYP3A5)
| 1.09 (1.08-1.09)
| 1.17 (1.14-1.19)
| No inhibition
| 1.35 (1.32-1.37)
| 1.90 (1.73-2.02)
| Weak inhibition
|
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; Cmax, maximum serum concentration; CYP450, cytochrome P450; DI, drug interaction; IL-6, interleukin-6.aMean Cmax on cycle 1 day 3=21 pg/mL.bHighest Cmax on cycle 1 day 3=288 pg/mL.
|
Predicted Enzyme Activity for Two IL-6 Kinetic Profiles in MajesTEC-1 and Corresponding Time with Start of Cycle 13
|
|
|
|
---|
Mean Cmax IL-6 kinetic profile (21 pg/mL)
|
CYP1A2
| 118a
| 70 (3)
| -
|
CYP2C9
| 95
| 82 (3)
| -
|
CYP2C19
| 87
| 65 (3)
| -
|
CYP3A4
| 89
| 68 (3)
| -
|
CYP3A5
| 89
| 68 (3)
| -
|
IL-6 kinetic profile with the highest IL-6 Cmax (288 pg/mL)
|
CYP1A2
| 128a
| 86 (4)
| 202 (8)
|
CYP2C9
| 77
| 105 (4)
| 164 (7)
|
CYP2C19
| 56
| 75 (3)
| 187 (8)
|
CYP3A4
| 63
| 82 (3)
| 194 (8)
|
CYP3A5
| 63
| 82 (3)
| 194 (8)
|
Abbreviations: Cmax, maximum serum concentration; CYP450, cytochrome P450; IL-6, interleukin-6. aMaximum activity.
|
literature search
A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File databases (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 07 January 2025.
1 | Moreau P, Garfall AL, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(6):495-505. |
2 | Touzeau C, Krishnan AY, Moreau P, et al. Efficacy and safety of teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after exposure to other BCMA targeted agents. Poster presented at: 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting; June 3-7; Chicago, IL/Virtual Meeting. |
3 | Willemin ME, Lin S, Zwart LD, et al. Evaluating drug interaction potential from cytokine release syndrome using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model: A case study of teclistamab. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024;13:1117-1129. |
4 | Data on File. Teclistamab. MajesTEC-1 Clinical Protocol Amendment 16; Janssen Research & Development, LLC EDMS-ERI-123047689, 23.0; 2024. |