This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

TECVAYLI - Drug Interactions

Last Updated: 01/21/2025

SUMMARY

  • Janssen does not recommend any practices, procedures or practice guidelines that deviate from the product labeling or are not approved the by regulatory agencies.
  • MajesTEC-1 (MMY1001) is an ongoing, phase 1/2, multicohort study evaluating the safety and efficacy of TECVAYLI in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).1,2 
    • Cohort A (triple-class exposed) included 165 patients with RRMM who were triple-class exposed to a proteasome inhibitor (PI), an immunomodulatory drug and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody.1 
    • Cohort C included 40 patients with RRMM, previously treated with a PI, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. All patients enrolled in Cohort C had prior exposure to B-cell maturation (BCMA)-targeted therapies. Janssen does not recommend the use of TECVAYLI in a manner inconsistent with the approved labeling.2
  • Willemin et al (2024)3 conducted a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) analysis to evaluate potential drug-drug interactions due to cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzyme inhibition by cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients administered TECVAYLI at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in the MajesTEC-1 study.
    • The PBPK model suggested the risk of a drug-drug interaction was highest during step-up dosing up until about 7 days after the first treatment dose, and during/after CRS.
    • At high IL-6 levels, a modest CYP450 inhibition for omeprazole and simvastatin, weak inhibition for midazolam and cyclosporine, and minimal inhibition for caffeine and s-warfarin was observed.

CLINICAL DATA - MAJESTEC-1 STUDY

MajesTEC-1 (MMY1001; clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT03145181; NCT04557098) is evaluating the safety and efficacy results of TECVAYLI in patients with RRMM after ≥3 prior lines of therapy, including triple-class exposure to a PI, an immunomodulatory drug and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody.1,2

Study Design/Methods

The main objectives are as follows: Part 1 (dose escalation) to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for TECVAYLI; Part 2 (dose expansion) to distinguish safety and tolerability of TECVAYLI at the RP2D; Part 3 (the phase 2 component) to evaluate the efficacy of TECVAYLI at the RP2D.1,2

  • Key eligibility criteria for Cohort A (triple-class exposed): measurable multiple myeloma, RRMM, ≥3 prior lines of treatment including a PI, an immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, no prior B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted therapy use.1
  • Key eligibility criteria for Cohort C: ≥3 prior lines of therapy, prior PI, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 antibody, enrolled patients who had prior exposure to BCMA-targeted treatment (chimeric antigen receptor [CAR]-T cell and/or antibody drug conjugate [ADC]).2
  • Dosing: week 1: step-up doses of TECVAYLI (0.06 mg/kg and 0.3mg/kg subcutaneously [SC]). The step-up doses were administered 2-4 days apart and completed 2-4 days prior to the 1st full treatment dose of TECVAYLI (1.5 mg/kg SC). Cycle 1+: TECVAYLI 1.5mg/kg SC weekly until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, death or the end of study.1,2
  • Primary endpoint: overall response rate.1,2

MajesTEC-1 Study Protocol - Key Prohibited Medications Related to Drug Interactions

The following medications were prohibited during the study:

  • Cytochrome P450 substrates with a narrow therapeutic index should have been used with caution during a CRS event and from the start of step-up doses to 7 days after the first treatment dose of TECVAYLI was administered.4
  • For patients who received warfarin (or other vitamin K antagonists), investigators should have considered switching from warfarin (or other vitamin K antagonists) to a different anticoagulant. For patients who could not be switched to a different anticoagulant and who experienced CRS, coagulation parameters should have been monitored closely during a CRS event and until CRS symptoms resolved.4

physiologically based pharmacokinetic model - Majestec-1 STUDY

Willemin et al (2024)3 applied PBPK modelling and simulations to analyze drug-drug interactions between TECVAYLI and other drugs that were substrates of CYP450.

Methods

  • A literature-based PBPK model was developed using observed IL-6 plasma concentrations (Cmax). Prospective simulations were performed using observed IL-6 data from 112 patients administered TECVAYLI at the RP2D in the MajesTEC-1 study either without or prior to administration of tocilizumab (an anti-IL-6 agent).
  • The exposure of substrates of CYP450 enzymes were predicted for 2 IL-6 kinetic profiles by the model: one with a mean IL-6 concentration per time event up to cycle 1 day 15 with mean Cmax=21 pg/mL, and the second with the highest individual observed concentration of IL-6 (288 pg/mL) among all patients occurring during cycle 1 before administration of any tocilizumab. Simulations for both scenarios included 10 trials of 75 subjects (aged 20-50 years, 50% female).
  • The following CYP450 substrates were evaluated for the potential of drug-drug interactions:
    • CYP1A2: caffeine
    • CYP2C9: s-warfarin
    • CYP2C19: omeprazole
    • CYP3A4/CYP3A5: midazolam and cyclosporine
    • CYP3A4: simvastatin
  • Additionally, the time to reach maximum change in CYP450 activity (due to IL-6) and return to 80% of baseline enzymatic activity was estimated, with the start of step-up dosing in cycle 1 as the reference. A cut-off of 80% was chosen, since the impact on exposures was considered low.

Results

PBPK Model Verification

  • The model captured the peak and steady state (50 pg/mL) plasma concentrations of IL-6. Drug-drug interactions of substrates were calculated at 50 pg/mL of IL-6 using data derived from literature. The predicted Cmax and AUC ratios for each of CYP substrates that were studied met the predefined success criteria.

PBPK Model Application to TECVAYLI RP2D

  • Of the 112 patients who experienced CRS after administration of TECVAYLI at RP2D, the mean IL-6 Cmax was 21 pg/mL, with a highest IL-6 Cmax of 288 pg/mL before any administration of tocilizumab.
  • Predicted exposures of CYP450 substrates at mean and maximum IL-6 levels are presented in the table: Simulated Change in CYP450 Substrate Exposure After Single Dose Administration of CYP450 Substrate in Presence of IL-6 Kinetics in MajesTEC-1.
    • Using scenario 1 with the mean Cmax of 21 pg/mL, the model predicted limited changes in exposure for caffeine, s-warfarin, omeprazole, midazolam, cyclosporine, and simvastatin (mean area under the curve [AUC] ratio, 0.87-1.20) at the IL-6 Cmax of 21 pg/mL.
    • Using scenario 2 with the highest IL-6 Cmax of 288 pg/mL, the impact on exposure was predicted to be moderate for omeprazole and simvastatin (mean AUC ratio= 2.23 and 2.09 respectively), weak for midazolam and cyclosporine (mean AUC ratio=1.90), and minimal for caffeine and s-warfarin (mean AUC ratio=0.82 and 1.25, respectively).
  • Predicted enzyme activity for 2 IL-6 kinetic profiles are shown in the Table: Predicted Enzyme Activity for Two IL-6 Kinetic Profiles in MajesTEC-1 and Corresponding Time with Start of Cycle 1.
    • Using scenario 1 (mean IL-6 profile), the highest maximum level of CYP activity was for caffeine (CYP1A2) at 118%, and the lowest was for omeprazole (CYP2C19) at 87%. After the start of cycle 1, the maximum difference was seen at 65-82 hours (3 days).
    • Using scenario 2 (highest IL-6 profile), the highest maximum was for caffeine (CYP1A2) at 128% and the lowest was for omeprazole (CYP2C19) at 56%. After the start of cycle 1, the maximum difference was seen at 75-105 hours (3-4 days).
  • In the profile with the highest IL-6 Cmax (288 pg/mL) CYP450 activity returned to 80% of the baseline enzymatic activity approximately 7-8 days after the start of cycle 1.

Simulated Change in CYP450 Substrate Exposure After Single Dose Administration of CYP450 Substrate in Presence of IL-6 Kinetics in MajesTEC-133 
CYP Substrate
With mean IL-6 kinetics profilea
With IL-6 kinetics profile of patient presenting highest IL-6 Cmaxb
Cmax ratio,
Mean (min-max)
AUC ratio,
Mean (min-max)
DI liability
Cmax ratio,
Mean (min-max)
AUC ratio,
Mean (min-max)
DI liability
Caffeine
(CYP1A2)
0.97
(0.96-0.97)
0.87
(0.84-0.90)
No interaction
0.95
(0.94-0.96)
0.82
(0.79-0.85)
No interaction
s-warfarin (CYP2C9)
1.00
(1.00-1.00)
1.05
(1.05-1.06)
No inhibition
1.01
(1.01-1.02)
1.25
(1.22-1.29)
Weak inhibition
Omeprazole (CYP2C19)
1.10
(1.09-1.12)
1.20
(1.17-1.30)
No inhibition
1.45
(1.39-1.50)
2.23
(2.06-2.52)
Moderate inhibition
Midazolam (CYP3A4/CYP3A5)
1.11
(1.10-1.11)
1.17
(1.15-1.18)
No inhibition
1.46
(1.43-1.49)
1.90
(1.79-1.99)
Weak inhibition
Simvastatin (CYP3A4)
1.17
(1.16-1.19)
1.20
(1.18-1.22)
No inhibition
1.86
(1.78-1.92)
2.09
(1.95-2.18)
Moderate inhibition
Cyclosporine (CYP3A4/CYP3A5)
1.09
(1.08-1.09)
1.17
(1.14-1.19)
No inhibition
1.35
(1.32-1.37)
1.90
(1.73-2.02)
Weak inhibition
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; Cmax, maximum serum concentration; CYP450, cytochrome P450; DI, drug interaction; IL-6, interleukin-6.aMean Cmax on cycle 1 day 3=21 pg/mL.bHighest Cmax on cycle 1 day 3=288 pg/mL.

Predicted Enzyme Activity for Two IL-6 Kinetic Profiles in MajesTEC-1 and Corresponding Time with Start of Cycle 13 
CYP450 substrate
Minimum activity reached in liver due to IL-6, %
Corresponding time after start of cycle 1, hours (days)
Time to return to 80% of baseline enzymatic activity after the start of cycle 1, hours (days)
Mean Cmax IL-6 kinetic profile (21 pg/mL)
CYP1A2
118a
70 (3)
-
CYP2C9
95
82 (3)
-
CYP2C19
87
65 (3)
-
CYP3A4
89
68 (3)
-
CYP3A5
89
68 (3)
-
IL-6 kinetic profile with the highest IL-6 Cmax (288 pg/mL)
CYP1A2
128a
86 (4)
202 (8)
CYP2C9
77
105 (4)
164 (7)
CYP2C19
56
75 (3)
187 (8)
CYP3A4
63
82 (3)
194 (8)
CYP3A5
63
82 (3)
194 (8)
Abbreviations: Cmax, maximum serum concentration; CYP450, cytochrome P450; IL-6, interleukin-6. aMaximum activity.

literature search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File databases (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 07 January 2025.

 

References

1 Moreau P, Garfall AL, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(6):495-505.  
2 Touzeau C, Krishnan AY, Moreau P, et al. Efficacy and safety of teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after exposure to other BCMA targeted agents. Poster presented at: 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting; June 3-7; Chicago, IL/Virtual Meeting.  
3 Willemin ME, Lin S, Zwart LD, et al. Evaluating drug interaction potential from cytokine release syndrome using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model: A case study of teclistamab. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024;13:1117-1129.  
4 Data on File. Teclistamab. MajesTEC-1 Clinical Protocol Amendment 16; Janssen Research & Development,  LLC EDMS-ERI-123047689, 23.0; 2024.