This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

GULLIVER Study - Treatment of Facial Psoriasis and/or Genital Psoriasis

Last Updated: 01/04/2025

SUMMARY

  • The company cannot recommend any practices, procedures, or usage that deviate from the approved labeling.
  • Please refer to the local labeling on approved uses of TREMFYA.
  • Summarized in this response are the interim results of the GULLIVER study, evaluating the effectiveness and safety of TREMFYA in adult patients with facial and/or genital psoriasis (PsO) in real-world settings.1,2

CLINICAL DATA

Observational Study (GULLIVER)

Bonifati et al (2024)1 and Bonifati et al (2023)2 presented the 12- and 28-week interim results of the prospective GULLIVER study, evaluating the effectiveness and safety of TREMFYA in adult patients with facial and/or genital PsO in real-world settings in Italy.

Study Design/Methods

  • Inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years with confirmed PsO diagnosis requiring systemic treatment with significant involvement (static physician global assessment [sPGA] score ≥3) of the facial and/or genital regions; enrolled any time after the first injection of TREMFYA but before completion of the next scheduled visit at week 4 or 12 per common clinical practice.1
  • Exclusion criteria: contraindication to TREMFYA; received an investigational drug (including investigational vaccines); or used an invasive investigational medical device within 30 days before the start of TREMFYA treatment.1
  • Patients received TREMFYA 100 mg at weeks 0,4 and then every 8 weeks through Week 52.1
  • Effectiveness was evaluated through week 12 using sPGA score (clear, 0; almost clear, 1; mild, 2; moderate, 3; moderate to severe, 4; severe, 5) in the individual components (erythema, scaling, and thickness).1
  • The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving sPGA score 0/1 and ≥2 grade improvement for the facial or genital region at week 52.3
  • Select secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients achieving sPGA score 0/1 and ≥2 grade improvement for the facial or genital region at week 12 and 28, change in the score of individual facial or genital sPGA components (erythema, thickness and scaling) among patients with a score of ≥3 for each sPGA component at week 12, and the proportion of patients achieving psoriasis area severity index (PASI) 75, 90, and 100 at week 12, among patients with a baseline PASI score of above or below 10.1,3

Results

Baseline Patient Characteristics
  • A total of 351 patients (facial PsO, n=147; genital PsO, n=204) were included in the interim analysis. For baseline patient characteristics, see Table: Baseline Characteristics.
  • Results were evaluated at week 12 (n=344) and week 28 (n=331) in patients who completed 28 weeks of treatment.1,2

Baseline Characteristics1,2
Characteristic
Facial PsO
(n=147)
Genital PsO
(n=204)
Total
(n=351)
Sex, male, n (%)
83 (56.5)
121 (59.3)
204 (58.1)
Age, years, mean (SD)
41.9 (14.9)
47.4 (15.7)
45.1 (15.5)
BMI, mean, kg/m2
27.5
26.8
-
Time from diagnosis to first dose of TREMFYA, years, mean (SD)
17.0 (13.0)
15.0 (11.7)
-
Patients who received ≥1 prior therapy for PsO, n (%)
138 (93.9)
188 (92.2)
326 (92.9)
Patients with prior biologic therapy, n (%)
55 (37.4)
83 (40.7)
138 (39.3)
sPGA Score, n (%)
   Moderate
76 (51.7)
118 (57.8)
194 (55.3)
   Moderate to severe
57 (38.8)
62 (30.4)
119 (33.9)
   Severe
14 (9.5)
24 (11.8)
38 (10.8)
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; PsO, psoriasis; SD, standard deviation; sPGA score, static physician global assessment score.
Effectiveness at Weeks 12 and 28
  • At week 12, a total of 79.4% (273/344) (facial PsO, 83.3% [120/144]; genital PsO, 76.5% [153/200]) of patients had achieved an sPGA score of 0/1 and ≥2 grade improvement, respectively.1,2
  • At week 28, a total of 91.8% (facial PsO, 90.2%; genital PsO, 93.1%) of patients had achieved an sPGA score of 0/1 and ≥2 grade improvement, respectively.2
  • Among patients with a score ≥3 in each sPGA analyzed component at baseline, an improved score of 0/1 in terms of thickness, scaling, and erythema was achieved in both the subgroups; see Table: Proportion of Patients with a sPGA Score of 0/1 in the sPGA Individual Components.

Proportion of Patients with a sPGA Score of 0/1 in the sPGA Individual Components1,2,4,a
Components
Facial PsO
Genital PsO
Week 12
   Thickness, %
88.9
84.9
   Scaling, %
93.0
86.4
   Erythema, %
85.7
77.7
Week 28
   Thickness, %
91.0
94.0
   Scaling, %
93.5
96.7
   Erythema, %
91.4
93.7
Abbreviations: PsO, psoriasis; sPGA, static physician global assessment.
aCalculated in patients with a score ≥3 in each sPGA analyzed component at baseline.

  • The mean (standard deviation) PASI score in patients with PASI score above 10 was 19.0 (8.3) at baseline and 2.2 (4.8) at week 12, and the mean PASI score in patients with PASI ≤10 was 6.1 (2.3) at baseline and 1.1 (1.6) at week 12.1
  • The proportion of patients achieving PASI 75, 90, and 100 at week 12 among patients with a PASI score ≤10 and >10 at baseline is summarized in Table: Proportion of Patients Achieving PASI 75, 90, and 100 at Week 12 by Baseline PASI Score.

Proportion of Patients Achieving PASI 75, 90, and 100 at Week 12 by Baseline PASI Score1,4a
PASI response
Baseline PASI ≤10 (n=142)
Baseline PASI >10 (n=176)
PASI ≥75, n (%) [95% CI]
104 (73.2)
[65.4-79.8]

152 (86.4)
[80.5-90.7]

PASI ≥90, n (%) [95% CI]
75 (52.8)
[44.6-60.8]

122 (69.3)
[62.2-75.7]

PASI 100, n (%) [95% CI]
59 (41.5)
[33.8-49.8]

84 (47.7)
[40.5-55.1]

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; PASI, psoriasis area severity index.
aPASI 75, indicate a ≥75% reduction in the PASI score from baseline; PASI 90, indicate ≥90% reduction PASI score from baseline; PASI 100, indicate 100% reduction in the PASI score from baseline.

Safety
  • At week 12, 44 adverse events (AEs) were observed in 32 patients. One patient in the genital PsO group reported mild and transient treatment-related AEs which included fatigue and nausea. No serious AEs were reported, and no AEs led to discontinuation of the study.1

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 24 June 2024.

 

References

1 Bonifati C, Lembo S, Richetta AG, et al. Effectiveness of guselkumab in patients with facial and/or genital psoriasis: interim analysis results at week 12 from the GULLIVER study. [published online June 26, 2024]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. doi:10.1111/jdv.20187.  
2 Bonifati C, Romanelli M, Corazza M, et al. Effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in patients with facial and/or genital psoriasis: interim results up to week 28 from the GULLIVER study. Poster presented at: European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2023; October 11-14, 2023; Berlin, Germany.  
3 Janssen-Cilag S.p.A. A study of guselkumab in naive or bio-experienced participants with regional (facial and genital) psoriasis (GULLIVER). In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2023 August 22]. Available from: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04439526 NLM Identifier: NCT04439526.  
4 Bonifati C, Lembo S, Richetta AG. Supplement to: Effectiveness of guselkumab in patients with facial and/or genital psoriasis: interim analysis results at week 12 from the GULLIVER study. [published online June 26, 2024]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. doi:10.1111/jdv.20187.