This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

Real-World Evidence with TREMFYA in Adult Patients with Plaque Psoriasis - Retrospective Studies

Last Updated: 08/05/2024

Summary

  • Please refer to the local labeling for relevant information on the use of TREMFYA in plaque psoriasis (PsO).
  • Real-world retrospective1-13 (≥100 patients and a follow-up duration of ≥1 year) and registry-based studies that evaluated the use of TREMFYA in adult patients with plaque PsO are described below.14-33

Real world Evidence


Summary of Retrospective and Registry-Based Real-World Studies in Adult Patients with Plaque PsO
Retrospective Studies (Results specific to TREMFYA are summarized below)
Gargiulo et al (2024)1 evaluated the drug survival of interleukin (IL)-inhibitors, including TREMFYA, in 5300 patients with plaque PsO from January 01, 2012 to December 31, 2022 across 15 Italian Dermatology Units.
The follow-up period was 4 years and drug survival was assessed using the KM estimator at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months. A total of 849 patients with a mean±SD age of 51.84±14.98 years who received TREMFYA were included. At baseline, the mean±SD BMI was 27.26±5.46 kg/m2, the mean±SD PASI score was 12.50±7.54, and 30.15% of patients were biologic-naïve.
Drug Survival
Overall probability (95% CI) of drug survival for TREMFYA throughout the study period was:
  • Six months: 0.968 (0.954-0.978)
  • Twelve months: 0.933 (0.914-0.949)
  • Twenty-four months: 0.88 (0.854-0.902)
  • Thirty-six months: 0.868 (0.840-0.891)
  • Forty-eight months: 0.824 (0.774-0.865)

Overall probability (95% CI) of drug survival for TREMFYA analyzing only treatment discontinuations due to ineffectiveness throughout the study period was:
  • Six months: 0.980 (0.968-0.987)
  • Twelve months: 0.950 (0.932-0.963)
  • Twenty-four months: 0.918 (0.895-0.936)
  • Thirty-six months: 0.908 (0.883-0.928)
  • Forty-eight months: 0.863 (0.811-0.902)

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations.
Sullivan et al (2023)2 evaluated treatment persistence in adult patients (N=878) with chronic plaque psoriasis who were prescribed ≥1 biologic of interest (TREMFYA, adalimumab, secukinumab or ustekinumab) from September 01, 2015 to December 31, 2021 using data from the Australian Department of Human Services Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS) 10% sample.
The KM method was used to determine treatment persistence which was defined as the time from the index date to the time of treatment discontinuation or censoring. A total of 385 patients were treated with TREMFYA (bio-naive, n=201; bio-experienced, n=184) and the median follow-up time was 21 months.
Treatment Persistence
  • During the study period, the median persistence for TREMFYA was not reached (n=385; 75.8% persistence at 24 months).  
  • In an adjusted analysis, treatment persistence (median months; HR, 95% CI; P-value) to TREMFYA was significantly greater compared to:
    • Adalimumab (16; 2.71, 1.94-3.8; P<0.001)
    • Ustekinumab (19; 2.91, 2.22-3.82; P<0.001)
    • Secukinumab (30; 1.8, 1.36-2.38; P<0.001)
  • In a sensitivity analysis where the maximum allowable gap was 3 times the maintenance dosing interval for each biologic, treatment persistence (HR, 95% CI; P-value) to TREMFYA was significantly greater compared to:
    • Adalimumab (10.40, 7.65-14.1; P<0.001)
    • Ustekinumab (2.14, 1.63-2.81; P<0.001)
    • Secukinumab (3.10, 2.38-4.03; P<0.001)

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations.
Galluzzo et al (2023)3 evaluated the efficacy of TREMFYA in adult patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque PsO through 148 weeks in a cross-sectional, snapshot study in Italy.
Patients (N=122) who received ≥2 doses of TREMFYA for >12 weeks were included. At baseline, the mean±SD duration of disease was 24±15.9 years, the mean±SD BMI was 28.6±6.1 kg/m2, 11.5% of patients were affected by PsA, the mean±SD PASI score was 16.2±12.9, and 64.8% of patients had prior exposure to biologics.
Efficacy
  • At week 148, the mean±SD PASI score was 1.2±2.0.
  • PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 responses were achieved by 97.6%, 82.9%, and 63.4% of patients, respectively (analyzed using LOCF).
  • The mean±SD PASI score among patients with BMI ≥30 and <30 kg/m2 was 2.1±4.1 and 0.6±1.7, respectively.
  • PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses, respectively, were achieved by 72.2% and 38.9% of patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 and 95.5% and 86.4% of patients with BMI <30 kg/m2.
  • Among biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients, a PASI 100 response was achieved by 86.7% and 50%, respectively.

Drug Survival and Discontinuation
  • The probability of drug survival after 2 years was 96%.
  • Treatment was discontinued in the first, second, and third years in 4, 3, and 2 patients, respectively.
    • TREMFYA was discontinued at weeks 52, 79, and 108 in 3 male patients due to the loss of secondary effectiveness and at week 28 in a female patient due lymphoma diagnosis (unrelated to TREMFYA).
    • Two patients were lost to follow-up during COVID-19 lockdown.
  • No significant difference in drug survival was observed in males vs females, obese vs nonobese patients, or biologic-naïve vs biologic-experienced patients.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Bardazzi et al (2022)4 evaluated the effectiveness, safety, tolerability, and drug retention of TREMFYA among adult patients with moderate to severe PsO who received treatment between October 2018 and December 2020 in Italy.
Patients (N=141) who received ≥1 dose of TREMFYA and had a minimum follow-up of 12 weeks were included. At baseline, the mean±SD BMI was 28.90±6.09 kg/m2, 29.1% of patients were affected by PsA, 14.9% of patients were biologic-naïve, 61.0% of patients had prior exposure to ≥2 biologics, and the median (IQR) PASI and NAPSI scores were 13.3 (10-15) and 32.5 (25-40), respectively.
Efficacy
  • The mean PASI score decreased from 14.2 at baseline to 0.14 at week 60.
  • The following proportion of patients achieved:
    • PASI score of ≤3 was achieved: 63.6% at week 12 and 100% at week 60.
    • PASI 75 response: 62.1% at week 12 and 100% at week 60 (decrease from baseline to week 60 was statistically significant; P<0.0001).
    • PASI 90 response: 32.1% at week 12 and 96.8% at week 60 (decrease from baseline to week 60 was statistically significant; P<0.0001).
    • PASI 100 response: 24.3% at week 12 and 83.9% at week 60 (decrease from baseline to week 60 was statistically significant; P<0.0001).
  • The mean NAPSI score decreased from 31.68 at baseline to 4.17 at week 60.
    • The decrease from baseline in the mean NAPSI score at week 12 (n=20) was statistically significant (P<0.0001).
  • Based on multiple logistic regression analysis, BMI >30, smoking, ≥3 comorbidities, difficult-to-treat areas, previous systemic drugs, or failure of ≥2 prior biologic therapies did not have any significant effect on the decrease in PASI score during treatment with TREMFYA (P>0.05).
  • The reduction in PASI scores was significantly lower among patients with PsA vs those with exclusive skin involvement (P=0.003).
    • Among patients with PsA, 29 (70.7%) reported a mild to moderate improvement in joint symptoms.

Safety
  • No SAEs, malignancies, or cardiovascular events were reported. TREMFYA was well tolerated with 1 reported case each of oral candidiasis and cutaneous rash.
  • After a mean±SD duration of 16±5.7 weeks, 12 patients discontinued the study due to primary or secondary inefficacy (n=9) or mild side effects (n=3).

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Del Alcázar et al (2022)5 evaluated the persistence of TREMFYA at 52 weeks in an observational, multicenter study in Spain among adult patients with moderate to severe plaque PsO who received TREMFYA between February 01, 2019-November 30, 2021.
A total of 360 patients were included. At baseline, the mean±SD BMI was 29.2±6.5 kg/m2, 15.6% of patients were affected by PsA, 10.5% of patients were biologic-naïve, and mean±SD PASI score was 10.9±7.6.
Treatment Persistence and Drug Survival
  • At 52 weeks, the cumulative probability of persistence of TREMFYA treatment was 88.3%. Drug survival was lower among patients with exposure to ≥3 prior biologics (78.3%) compared with patients with exposure to 1, 2, or no prior biologics (P<0.05).
  • The risk of discontinuation of TREMFYA was lower among biologic-naïve patients and patients with exposure to 1 prior biologic vs greater number of biologics, (HR, 0.194; 95% CI, 0.050.83 vs HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.05-0.40).
  • No statistically significant differences were observed in the survival curves for BMI (<30 vs ≥30), PsA, or initial severity of PsO (PASI score ≤10 vs >10).
  • At 52 weeks, 42 (11.6%) patients had discontinued treatment due to lack of loss efficacy (n=21), AEs (n=4), joint failure (n=2), loss to follow-up (n=5), and patient’s decision (n=6).

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Galluzzo et al (2022)6 evaluated the efficacy and safety of TREMFYA among patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque PsO who received treatment for 12 months in a longitudinal study between September 2019 and February 2021 in Italy.
A total of 307 patients who received treatment for ≥12 weeks were included. At baseline, the mean±SD duration of disease was 20.1±13.6 years, the mean±SD PASI score was 14.9±9.1, 35.5% of patients were biologic-naïve, and 22.5% of patients were affected by PsA.
Efficacy
  • In the overall population, the mean PASI score was 1.4 at 6 months.
    • A PASI score of ≤3 was achieved by 85.3% of patients at 52 weeks.
    • PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 responses were achieved by 82.7%, 68.7%, and 51.1% of patients, respectively, at 52 weeks.
  • Among patients with a baseline PASI score of <10, the mean PASI score was 0.8 at 12 months (n=35).
    • A PASI score of ≤3 was achieved by 94.3% of patients at 12 months.
    • PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 responses were achieved by 80.7%, 63.6%, and 61.4% of patients, respectively, at 12 months.
  • Among patients with a baseline PASI score of ≥10 (n=92), the mean PASI score was 1.3 at 12 months.
    • A PASI score of ≤3 was achieved by 92.4% of patients at 12 months.
    • PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 responses were achieved by 83.6%, 70.8%, and 47.0% of patients, respectively, at 12 months.
  • Among patients without comorbidities (n=32) and those with comorbidities (n=95), PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 responses were achieved by 90% and 80%, 71% and 67%, and 59% and 49%, respectively, at 12 months.
  • Among biologic-naïve patients (n=19), PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 responses were achieved by 93%, 77%, and 58%, respectively, at 12 months.

Safety
  • AEs were observed in 10 patients and were mild, except for a transient ischemic attack in 1 patient that led to motor impairment and 2 AEs (erythroderma and general malaise with sudden sweating, fatigue, and muscle aches) that led to treatment discontinuation.
  • No reactivation of hepatitis B or C was reported during the study.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes
Jung et al (2022)7 compared the efficacy and safety of TREMFYA, secukinumab, and ustekinumab and also identified the factors independently affecting the survival rates of these drugs among patients with moderate to severe PsO who received treatment between August 2012-July 2021 in an observational, single-center cohort study in Korea.
Biologic-naïve adult patients with moderate to severe PsO (PASI ≥10 and BSA involvement ≥10%) refractory to nonbiologic systemic immunosuppressive therapies (cyclosporine or methotrexate) or phototherapy (narrow band ultraviolet B) for >6 months were included.
The primary outcomes included proportion of patients achieving PASI 75 or PASI 90 at week 16 for rapid response, PASI 90 response at week 56 for long-term response, and PASI 100 response at week 56 for complete remission.
A total of 23 patients who received TREMFYA were included. At baseline, the mean±SD PASI score was 20.0±9.2.
Efficacy
  • Among patients receiving TREMFYA, PASI 75 was achieved by 55.2% of patients at week 16.
  • PASI 90 response was achieved by 39.1% and 91.3% of patients at weeks 16 and 56, respectively.
  • PASI 100 response was achieved by 82.6% of patients at week 56.

Drug Survival
  • At week 56, patients who received TREMFYA had the longest overall drug survival rate (95.7% [22/23]).
    • The median duration of drug survival was 55.0 weeks (95% CI, 52.8-57.1).
    • One patient switched biologics due to loss of efficacy, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and none discontinued TREMFYA.
  • After initiation of TREMFYA, the change from other biologics to TREMFYA was significantly increased irrespective of the treatment that was administered, and drug survival was significantly decreased (HR, 3.42; 95% CI, 2.81-4.17; P=0.002).

Safety
  • Four patients receiving TREMFYA experienced ≥1 AE, including 1 case each of fungal infection, injection-site reaction, conjunctivitis, and arthralgia. No SAE affecting drug survival was reported.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Mälkönen et al (2022)8 evaluated the efficacy and persistence of TREMFYA among adult patients with moderate to severe plaque PsO who received treatment between December 01, 2017-December 01, 2019, in a nationwide, multicenter study (FINGUS) in Finland.
The primary objectives were exploration of persistence of TREMFYA treatment and clinical outcomes at 9-14 months after treatment initiation.
The secondary objectives included characterization of patients who received TREMFYA, assessment of TREMFYA dosing patterns, reasons for treatment discontinuation, and evaluation of clinical outcomes over short (3-6 months) and longer terms (15-18 months).
A total of 181 patients were included. At baseline, median (IQR) BMI was 30.3 (26-36.4) kg/m2, median (IQR) duration of disease was 18.8 (11.9-29.8) years, 21.6% of patients were affected by PsA, median (IQR) BSA involvement was 7% (5-11), median (IQR) PASI score was 7.0 (5.0-10.2), and median (IQR) DLQI score was 14 (7-18).
Efficacy
  • The median (IQR) absolute PASI values decreased significantly from baseline (7.0 [5.0-10.2]; n=133) to 3-6 (1.2 [0.0-3.0]; P<0.001; n=93) and 9-14 months (1.0 [0.0-1.8]; P<0.001; n=40).
    • The proportion of patients with PASI score of ≤2 was 7.5% (n=133) at baseline, 60.2% (n=93) at 3-6 months, and 80.0% (n=40) at 9-14 months.
    • The proportion of patients with PASI score of 2 to ≤4 was 9.8% (n=133) at baseline, 9.4% (n=93) at 3-6 months, and 20.0% (n=40) at 9-14 months.
    • The proportion of patients with PASI score of >4 was 82.7% (n=133) at baseline to 20.4% (n=93) at 3-6 months.
  • Significant improvements were also observed in BSA, DLQI, and PGA scores.8

Drug Persistence
  • Overall median (IQR) duration of treatment with TREMFYA was 10.9 months (biologic-experienced group, 9.6 months; biologic-naïve group, 11.7 months).
  • At 1 year, among 85 patients with a follow-up duration of ≥1 year, 73 continued to receive TREMFYA.
  • TREMFYA was permanently discontinued in 21 patients after induction (n=5) or during maintenance (n=16), of whom, 16 were initiated on either successive biologic therapy or apremilast.
  • Treatment discontinuation was significantly more common among biologic-experienced vs biologic-naïve patients (16.7% vs 5.1%; P=0.016).
    • Reasons for discontinuation included was primary nonresponse (n=9), and patient’s wish, tolerability, loss of response, nonadherence, or other reasons were reported in <5 patients each.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Ruiz-Villaverde et al (2022)9 evaluated the effectiveness, safety, and drug survival of TREMFYA among adult patients with moderate to severe plaque PsO who received treatment between February 2019 and February 2022 in a multicenter, observational cross-sectional study in Spain.
Patients who were diagnosed ≥1 year ago and experienced primary or secondary failure or had AEs due to previous biologics, including anti-TNFα, anti-IL17, and anti-IL12/23 agents were included.
Primary failure was defined as the inability to achieve PASI 90 response or PASI <3, and secondary failure was defined as the inability to achieve PASI 90 or PASI <3 after 12 weeks of treatment.
A total of 103 patients (prior treatment with anti-TNFα [n=29; 28.2%], anti-IL17 [n=29; 28.2%], and anti-IL12/23 [n=45; 43.7%]) were included. At baseline, mean±SD duration of PsO was 21.6±10.3 years, mean±SD BMI was 29.2±5.8 kg/m2, 20% of patients were affected by PsA, mean±SD PASI score was 13.5±7.7, mean±SD BSA (% involvement) was 20.2±15.9, mean±SD VAS score for pruritus was 5.7±2.7, mean±SD DLQI score was 14.2±6.9, and 46% of patients had prior exposure to ≥3 biologics.
Efficacy
  • Overall, PASI score, BSA involvement, and VAS and DLQI scores improved across all groups at week 12.
  • At baseline, PASI score was the lowest in the prior anti-IL12/23 group (vs prior anti-TNFα, P=0.00037; vs anti-IL17, P=0.0144).
    • At week 12, PASI score was significantly lower in the prior anti-TNFα vs prior anti-IL17 group (P=0.0051).
    • From weeks 24 to 76, no difference was observed between the groups, and PASI score was <3.
  • At baseline, BSA involvement was greater in the prior anti-TNFα vs prior anti-IL12/23 group (P=0.318).
    • At week 12, BSA involvement was lower in the prior anti-TNFα vs anti-IL17 group (P=0.015).
    • At week 76, BSA involvement in the prior anti-IL17 group reached its peak (mean±SD, 3.4±9.36; n=10).
  • At baseline, VAS score for pruritus was the lowest in the prior IL-12/23 group with statistically significant differences (vs anti-TNFα, P<0.0001; vs anti-IL17, P=0.0002).
    • No differences were observed between the groups from week 12 to week 76.
    • At week 76, the mean VAS score for pruritus was 0 in the prior anti-IL17 group (n=5).
  • At baseline, DLQI score was the lowest in the prior IL-12/23 group (vs prior anti-TNFα, P<0.0001; vs prior anti-IL17, P=0.0009).
    • At weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52, DLQI score was greater, however, nonsignificant, in the prior anti-IL-17 group.

Treatment Survival
  • The maximum follow-up durations in the prior anti-TNFα, anti-IL-17, and anti-IL12/23 groups were 152 weeks, 137 weeks, and 149 weeks, respectively.
  • At 130 weeks, treatment survival, including all discontinuations, for the prior anti-TNFα, anti-IL17, and anti-IL12/23 groups was 81.9%, 88.7%, and 79.3%, respectively.
    • Treatment survival, including discontinuations only due to lack of efficacy or safety, for the prior anti-TNFα, anti-IL17, and anti-IL12/23 groups was 100.0%, 92.7%, and 92.1%, respectively.
    • No differences were observed between the groups.
  • Discontinuations were reported in 12 patients:
    • Prior anti-TNFα group: 3 discontinuations due to other causes.
    • Prior anti-IL17 group: 2 discontinuations due to secondary failures and 1 due to other causes.
    • Prior anti-IL12/23 group: 1 discontinuation each due to primary failure, secondary failure, and AE and 3 due to other causes.

Safety
  • TREMFYA was well tolerated with a good risk/benefit profile.
  • One patient in the prior anti-IL12/23 group discontinued treatment due to intolerability.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Torres et al (2021)10 evaluated drug survival and identify the clinical predictors of drug survival for TREMFYA, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, tildrakizumab, and Risankizumab among patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque PsO who received treatment between February 01, 2015 and October 31, 2021 in an international multicentric study in Canada, Czech Republic, Italy, Greece, Portugal, Spain, and Switzerland. Results specific to TREMFYA are described below.
Drug survival was defined as the period during which a patient received a certain drug from its initiation to its definitive discontinuation (due to loss of effectiveness, safety, patient decision, loss of follow-up, or others) or last clinical observation.
Primary failure was defined as drug discontinuation due to lack of effectiveness at the end of the induction phase for the respective drug. Secondary failure was defined as definitive drug discontinuation due to loss of response during the maintenance phase of treatment.
A total of 879 patients who received TREMFYA were included. The time of exposure for TREMFYA was 1445 PY, the mean±SD duration of disease was 17.9±12.9 years, and 18.3% of patients were affected by PsA.
Drug Survival and Discontinuation
  • Cumulative probabilitya of drug survival for TREMFYA at 36 months due to any reason for drug discontinuation and especially due to ineffectiveness
    • Events due to all reasons=72
    • Events due to ineffectiveness=63
  • At 36 months, patients at risk=121
    • Drug survival (95% CI; all reasons), 0.88 (0.85-0.91); events, 5
    • Drug survival (95% CI; ineffectiveness), 0.90 (0.87-0.92); events, 4
  • Considering all reasons and ineffectiveness as the causes of drug discontinuation:
    • At 24 months, the cumulative probability of continuing with TREMFYA was approximately 0.90.
  • At 36 months, TREMFYA had the highest cumulative probability of drug survival.
  • Decision to intensify therapy (increasing the dose and/or shortening of dosing interval) due to an inadequate response was made in 65 (7.4%) patients receiving TREMFYA.
  • The causes of drug discontinuation were:
    • Loss of efficacy: n=63 (7.2%); primary failure, n=19 (2.2%); secondary failure, n=44 (5.0%)
    • Safety reasons: n=3 (0.3%); IBD, n=2 (0.2%); malignancy, n=1 (0.1%)
    • Loss of follow-up: n=2 (0.2%)
  • Patient decision: n=4 (0.5%)

Safety
  • Overall, 53 safety events were reported, and included any infection (n=39; any infection with hospitalization, n=8; Candida infection, n=8), MACE (n=1), IBD (n=1), depression (n=11), and cancer (n=1).

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Ghislain et al (2021)11 evaluated the long-term (up to week 88) effectiveness and tolerability of TREMFYA among adult patients with plaque PsO in a multicenter, observational study in Belgium.
A total of 308 patients were included. At baseline, the mean (range) duration of PsO was 18.5 (1-64) years, mean (range) PASI score was 17.7 (3.4-37), and 42.2% of patients were biologic-naïve.
Efficacy
  • At week 88, mean±SD absolute PASI score decreased from 17.7±6.4 at baseline to 0.6±1.7.
    • PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 were achieved in 95.5%, 91%, and 73% of patients, respectively.

Safety
  • Minor side effects were observed in <1% of patients and included fatigue (n=2) patients, headache (n=1), joint pain (n=1), bronchitis (n=1), flu-like symptoms (n=1), Koebner phenomenon on tattoo (n=1), and injection-site reaction (n=1).

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes
Lytvyn et al (2021)12 compared the drug survival of TREMFYA in biologic-naïve vs biologic-experienced patients with plaque PsO in a multicenter study in Canada.
Discontinuation was defined as the interruption of TREMFYA treatment due to any cause (nonresponder imputation).
A total of 264 patients were included. At baseline, mean±SD duration of PsO in total population was 17.3±11.7 years, 25.4% of the total population was affected by PsA, 67 patients were biologic-naïve, and 114 and 83 patients had previously failed 1 and ≥2 biologic therapies, respectively. The mean±SD PGA scores were 2.6±0.9, 3.1±0.7, 2.4±1.0, and 2.6±0.8 among total population, biologic-naïve, those with exposure to 1 previous biologic, and ≥2 previous biologics, respectively. The mean±SD PASI scores were 10.9±8.5, 16.7±8.4, 7.5±7.4, and 10.3±7.1 among total population, biologic-naïve (n=39), those with exposure to 1 previous biologic (n=55), and ≥2 previous biologics (n=34), respectively.
Drug Survival
  • The overall drug survival rate decreased from 0.989 at week 12 to 0.674 at week 104.
  • During the first 104 weeks of treatment, lack of efficacy (n=30; 11.4%) and incomplete lesion clearance or residual arthralgia (n=10; 3.8%) were the most common reasons for discontinuation of TREMFYA.
  • Over 104 weeks, drug survival was the highest among biologic-naïve patients and lowest among patients who had previously failed ≥2 biologics (P=0.0274).

Safety
  • Injection-site reactions were reported in 4 patients; arthralgia, lethargy, headache, and gastrointestinal upset were reported in 2 patients each.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Ruiz-Villaverde et al (2021)13 conducted an observational, longitudinal study to evaluate the efficacy of TREMFYA by baseline characteristics among patients with moderate to severe PsO who received treatment between February 2019 and February 2022 in Spain.
A total of 107 patients were included. At baseline, mean±SD PASI score was 14.73±6.95, mean±SD BSA (% involvement) was 21.76±15.71, mean±SD VAS score for pruritus was 6.18±2.25, and mean±SD DLQI score was 15.45±5.51.
Efficacy
  • In all patient groups (biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced), a significant decrease was observed in PASI and DLQI scores from weeks 0 to 12; however, no difference was observed between the groups at different time points (weeks 0, 12, 24, 36, and 52).
  • Over 52 weeks, in the BMI subgroups of 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, 25.0-29.9 kg/m2, and ≥30 kg/m2, no difference was observed in the baseline PASI or DLQI scores, except in the baseline PASI scores between the subgroups 25.0-29.9 kg/m2 and ≥30 kg/m2 (P=0.0187).
  • Similar results were observed for absolute PASI scores by gender, age, and PsO evolution.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Registry-Based Studies (Results specific to TREMFYA are summarized below)
Australasian Psoriasis Registry
Ismail et al (2023)14 evaluated the effectiveness and drug survival of TREMFYA among specific subgroups of patients with severe PsO who received treatment between 2019 and October 1, 2022.
At baseline, the median (IQR) BMI was 31.3 (26.1-36.2) kg/m2, the median (IQR) duration of disease was 26.0 (17.0-34.0) years, 27.5% of patients were affected by PsA, the median (IQR) PASI score was 24.0 (17.9-32.2), 12.7% of patients were biologic-naïve, and 87.3% of patients were biologic-experienced.
Efficacy
  • The effectiveness of TREMFYA was consistent across different subgroups of patients.
  • Univariable associations (HR [95% CI]) with achieving PASI 90 response across different subgroups were as follows:
    • Gender (male as reference): female, 1.56 (1.02-2.40), P=0.041.
    • BMI categories (18.5-24.9 kg/m2 as reference): 25-29.9 kg/m2, 1.53 (0.77-3.04), P=0.224; 30-34.9 kg/m2, 0.93 (0.47-1.85), P=0.839; 35-39.9 kg/m2, 1.05 (0.51-2.19), P=0.894; >40 kg/m2, 0.61 (0.25-1.47), P=0.270.
    • Smoking status (nonsmokers as reference): current smoker, 1.02 (0.64-1.63), P=0.940; former smoker, 1.11 (0.43-2.86), P=0.827.
    • Alcohol consumption (infrequent [≤6 times per year] as reference): intermediate (<3 days/week to 1-2 times/month), 0.96 (0.58-1.58), P=0.878; frequent (≥3 days/week), 0.71 (0.37-1.37), P=0.309.
    • Number of comorbidities (0 as reference): 1 comorbidity, 0.70 (0.31-1.60), P=0.397; 2 comorbidities, 0.86 (0.35-2.11), P=0.748; ≥3 comorbidities, 0.66 (0.28-1.58), P=0.355.
    • Presence of PsA: 0.91 (0.56-1.48), P=0.702.
    • Biologic-naïve: 0.81 (0.44-1.49), P=0.496.
    • Baseline PASI: 0.98 (0.96-1.01), P=0.220.

Drug Survival
  • The drug survival of TREMFYA was consistent across different subgroups of patients.
  • Univariable associations (HR [95% CI]) with drug survival across different subgroups were as follows:
    • Gender (male as reference): female, 0.49 (0.19-1.23), P=0.128.
    • BMI categories (18.5-24.9 kg/m2 as reference): 25-29.9 kg/m2, 1.19 (0.33-4.21), P=0.791;
      30-34.9 kg/m2, 1.18 (0.33-4.18), P=0.798; 35-39.9 kg/m2, 1.03 (0.26-4.14), P=0.962; >40 kg/m2, 1.20 (0.27-5.38), P=0.808.
    • Smoking status (nonsmokers as reference): current smoker, 0.73 (0.31-1.73), P=0.475; former smoker, 0.63 (0.08-4.79), P=0.657.
    • Alcohol consumption (infrequent [≤6 times per year] as reference): intermediate (<3 days/week to 1-2 times/month), 1.21 (0.48-3.06), P=0.691; frequent (≥3 days/week), 1.79 (0.62-5.17), P=0.281.
    • Number of comorbidities (0 as reference): 1 comorbidity, 0.14 (0.04-0.53), P=0.004; 2 comorbidities, 0.55 (0.17-1.81), P=0.323; 3+ comorbidities, 0.46 (0.15-1.41), P=0.175.
    • Presence of PsA, 0.88 (0.36-2.12), P=0.767.
    • Biologic-naïve, not applicable, P=0.046.
    • Baseline PASI, 1.02 (0.98-1.07), P=0.388.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
BADBIR
Savage et al (2022)15 evaluated the effectiveness of TREMFYA among adult patients with chronic plaque PsO after 1 year of treatment.
Efficacy
  • An absolute PASI score of ≤1, ≤2, ≤3, and ≤5 was achieved by 55.7% (n=68), 64.8% (n=79), 76.2% (n=93), and 83.6% (n=102) of patients, respectively.
    • The mean DLQI scores among these patients were 0.88 (1.80), 0.80 (1.00), 1.11 (2.37), and 1.26 (2.58), respectively.
  • A DLQI score of 0/1 and minimal clinically important difference of ≥4-point improvement was achieved by 63.1% (n=89) and 74.7% (n=68) of patients, respectively.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
BIOREP
Hugo et al (2023)16 evaluated the efficacy, impact on QoL, drug survival, and safety of TREMFYA among patients with moderate to severe PsO in the Czech Republic.
A total of 333 patients who received ≥1 dose of TREMFYA 100 mg SC were included. At baseline, the mean±SD duration of disease was 22.1±13.2 years, the mean±SD BMI was 30.3±6.6 kg/m2, 21.0% of patients were affected by PsA, the mean±SD PASI score was 16.0±7.7, 48.6% of patients were biologic-naïve, and the mean±SD DLQI score was 14.2±6.5.
Efficacy and Drug Survival
  • The mean±SD PASI score decreased from baseline to 0.8±1.2 at 36 months.
  • The absolute PASI scores of ≤3 and ≤1, respectively, were achieved by 81.8% (n=256) and 54.0% (n=169) of patients after 3 months and 94.8% (n=55) and 70.7% (n=41) of patients after 36 months.
  • PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses, respectively, were achieved by 61.7% (n=193) and 32.9% (n=103) of patients after 3 months and 75.9% (n=44) and 55.2% (n=32) of patients after 36 months.
  • PASI 90 and PASI 100 response rates at 36 months among different subgroups were as follows:
    • Biologic-naïve vs biologic-experienced patients: 81.3% vs 73.8% and 68.8% vs 50.0%, respectively.
    • Patients with BMI <25 vs ≥25 kg/m2: 100.0% vs 70.2% and 72.7% vs 51.1%, respectively.
    • Patients with vs without PsA: 80.0% vs 74.5% and 50.0% vs 55.3%, respectively.
  • The mean±SD DLQI score decreased from baseline to 0.7±1.4 at 36 months.
    • The mean DLQI scores among patients who achieved PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses were 1.08 and 0.00, respectively.
  • Overall cumulative drug survival after 36 months of therapy was 85.5%. Drug survival was not significantly affected by prior biologic treatment (P=0.39), BMI (P=0.48), or presence of PsA (P=0.35).

Safety
  • Twenty-six AEs were reported in 23 patients, including infections (n=17; COVID-19 [n=11]; other infections [n=6]), malignancy (n=3; endometrial carcinoma [n=1]; prostate adenocarcinoma [n=1]; colorectal carcinoma [n=1]), dermatological AEs (n=1), and others (n=5; exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [n=3; led to death in 1 patient]; transient ischemic attack [n=1]; total hip replacement after injury [n=1]).
  • Drug discontinuation or switching of TREMFYA therapy was reported in 41 patients, and the reasons included loss of effectiveness (n=24), patient noncooperation (n=5), AEs (n=2; worsening of atopic dermatitis [n=1]; transient ischemic attack [n=1]), surgical procedure (n=2), pregnancy (n=1), others (n=3), and death (n=4; acute gastric ulcer with bleeding and perforation [n=1]; cardiorespiratory failure [n=1]; respiratory failure [n=1]; heart failure [n=1]).

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
IBM MarketScan® Research Databases (Results specific to TREMFYA are summarized below)
Fitzgerald et al (2023)17 described the rates of real-world persistence, reinitiation, and possible remission in patients with PsO who initiated TREMFYA, adalimumab, secukinumab, and ixekizumab using data from the IBM MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases.
Patients were included in the study if they had ≥2 claims with a diagnosis of PsO (ICD-10-CM) during the most recent period of continuous eligibility, with ≥1 claim during the baseline period or on the index date (July 13, 2017); had ≥1 claim for TREMFYA, adalimumab, secukinumab, or ixekizumab, with the first observed claim on or after July 13, 2017; had ≥12 months of continuous health plan eligibility before the index date; and were ≥18 years old on the index date.
Therapy exposure gaps for TREMFYA per primary (exposure gap >2 times the per-label dosing frequency after the induction phase or mode of days of supply) and secondary definitions (exposure gap >1 time the per-label dosing frequency after the induction phase or mode of days of supply) were >120 days and >60 days, respectively.
Complete remission was defined as no claims for any PsO-related treatment after the index biologic discontinuation (per primary definition) among patients with ≥6 months of follow-up after discontinuation.
With remission of moderate to severe disease, patients were allowed to have claims for topical therapies after discontinuation of the index biologic.
Among 3408 patients who received TREMFYA, the mean follow-up duration was 16.5 months, 16.7% of patients were affected by PsA, and 47.8% of patients were biologic-experienced.
Efficacy
Overall population
  • Among patients who discontinued TREMFYA (per primary definition) and had ≥6 months of follow-up, complete remission (per proxy definition) was achieved by 17.2%.
    • Remission of moderate to severe disease was achieved by 28.3% of patients.

Biologic-naïve patients (n=1779)
  • The mean follow-up time was 14.4 months.
  • The median time to discontinuation was 29.0 months.17
  • Among patients who discontinued TREMFYA during the follow-up period, TREMFYA was reinitiated in 24.1%.
    • The mean time to reinitiation was 4.4 months.
  • Per the primary definition, the rates of complete remission and remission of moderate to severe disease were 25.6% and 42.5%, respectively.17

Biologic-experienced patients (n=1629)
  • The mean (median) follow-up time was 18.9 (18.1) months.
  • The median time to discontinuation was 24.4 months.17
  • Among patients who discontinued TREMFYA during the follow-up period, TREMFYA was reinitiated in 21.8%.
    • The mean (median) time to reinitiation was 3.6 (2.1) months.
  • Per the primary definition, the rates of complete remission and remission of moderate to severe disease were 10.7% and 17.3%, respectively.17

Drug Persistence
Discontinuation of index biologic based on the primary definition for therapy-exposure gap
  • At 24 months, the probability of discontinuation was 47.4%.
  • The median time to discontinuation was 26.2 months.
  • Among the patients who discontinued TREMFYA during the follow-up period, TREMFYA was reinitiated in 22.9%.
    • The mean (median) time to reinitiation was 4.0 (2.6) months.

Discontinuation of index biologic based on the secondary definition for therapy-exposure gap
  • At 24 months, the probability of discontinuation was 64.5%.
  • The median time to discontinuation was 13.3 months.
  • Among patients who discontinued TREMFYA during the follow-up period, TREMFYA was reinitiated in 43.1%.
    • The mean (median) time to reinitiation was 2.4 (1.1) months.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Zhdanava et al (2023)18 evaluated treatment persistence and switching with TREMFYA vs secukinumab and TREMFYA vs ixekizumab among adult bio-experienced patients with PsO.
Patients included were: patients with first observed claim (index date) for TREMFYA, secukinumab, or ixekizumab between July 13, 2017 - May 01, 2021; continuous health plan eligibility for ≥12 months before the index date; ICD-10-CM diagnoses of PsO on ≥2 dates during the baseline period or on the index date; no claims on the index date for other biologics indicated for PsO; and ≥1 claim during the baseline period for any other psoriasis-indicated biologic agent (bio-experienced).

Pairwise analyses comparing TREMFYA to each comparator were conducted using IBM MarketScan Research Databases from January 01, 2016, to October 31, 2021. Persistence was defined as the absence of treatment supply gaps of over twice the labeled dosing interval for TREMFYA (>120 days) or secukinumab and ixekizumab (>60 days). Probability of persistence was described by KM analysis.
Treatment Persistence
TREMFYA versus weighted secukinumab analysis
  • A total of 1314 patients received TREMFYA, with a mean±SD age of 49.3±12.4 years.
  • The median time of persistence for TREMFYA was 26.2 months.
  • The probability of persistence for TREMFYA at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months was 91.2%, 82.9%, 68.3%, 59.1%, and 53.1%, respectively.
  • The TREMFYA cohort was 1.96, 2.03, 2.00, 2.04, and 2.09 times more persistent than secukinumab at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, respectively (all P<0.001).

TREMFYA versus weighted ixekizumab analysis
  • A total of 1564 patients received TREMFYA, with a mean±SD age of 49.4±12.1 years.
  • The median time of persistence for TREMFYA was 25.9 months.
  • The probability of persistence for TREMFYA at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months was 91.8%, 82.5%, 67.7%, 58.4%, and 52.3%, respectively.
  • The TREMFYA cohort was 2.26, 1.91, 1.76, 1.67 and 1.67 times more persistent than ixekizumab at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, respectively (all P<0.001).

Switch to Non-Index Biologic
TREMFYA versus weighted secukinumab
  • The probability of switching for TREMFYA at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months was 1.8%, 5.3%, 13.9%, 19.2%, and 25.3%, respectively.

TREMFYA versus weighted ixekizumab
  • The probability of switching for TREMFYA at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months was 1.9%, 5.7%, 14.5% 20.7%, and 28.3%, respectively.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Blauvelt et al (2022)19 compared TREMFYA and ixekizumab in terms of adherence and persistence with therapy, days on monotherapy and concomitant therapy, and rates of discontinuation and switching of therapy among patients with PsO who received treatment between July 01, 2017 and December 31, 2018 (indexing period) in the US.
Patients with ≥1 claim for TREMFYA or ixekizumab after the first diagnosis of PsO
Treatment adherence was measured by PDC and MPR during follow-up. PDC and MPR were defined as the number of days’ supply divided by the total number of days during the follow-up period. When there was an overlap in the periods covered by consecutive fills, PDC considered the actual or concurrently covered days; MPR considered all days supplied. High adherence was defined as MPR or PDC ≥80%.
Treatment persistence was defined as a prescription refill within up to 60 or 90 days of the last day of supply. The end date of persistence was defined as the last day’s supply of the prescription before the permissible gap.
Drug discontinuation was defined as a treatment gap of ≥90 days, and reinitiation was defined as a new claim for the index drug after meeting the criteria for discontinuation and not switching to other therapies.
Switching from index therapy was defined as prescription of a new medication when the days’ supply of the new therapy (including biologics, systemic therapy, and phototherapy) extended beyond the last day supplied by the index medication.
A total of 740 patients were included. At baseline, 45.7% of patients were biologic-naïve and 53.2% of patients had prior exposure to 1 biologic.
Medication Adherence
  • Among patients in the weighted TREMFYA group with a 6-month preindex and 1-year follow-up period, the mean±SD PDC was 0.60±0.25, reflecting a mean±SD of 219±92 days covered for TREMFYA.
    • For TREMFYA monotherapy, the mean±SD PDC was 0.56±0.26, reflecting a mean±SD of 203±95 days covered.
  • For TREMFYA with concomitant therapy (including biologic, systemic therapy, or phototherapy), the mean±SD PDC was 0.05±0.09, reflecting a mean±SD of 16±33 days covered.

Treatment Persistence
  • Based on a permissible treatment gap of <60 days:
    • At 1-year follow-up, the proportion of patients who were persistent on TREMFYA (number of patients at risk [n]) were: 60 days, 83.2% (n=618); 120 days, 74.3% (n=552); 180 days, 64.3% (n=477); 240 days, 56.9% (n=422); 300 days, 49.7% (n=369); 360 days, 49.2% (n=284).
    • At ≥6 months follow-up, the proportion of patients who were persistent (number of patients at risk [n]) were: 200 days, 62.8% (n=507); 400 days, 42.4% (n=272); 600 days, 34.5% (n=113); 800 days, 28.2% (n=13).
  • Based on a permissible treatment gap of <90 days:
    • At 1-year follow-up, the proportion of patients who were persistent on TREMFYA (number of patients at risk [n]) were: 60 days, 89.5% (n=664); 120 days, 82.3% (n=610); 180 days, 74.7% (n=554); 240 days, 68.4% (n=508); 300 days, 64.3% (n=455).
  • At ≥6 months follow-up, the proportion of patients who were persistent on TREMFYA (number of patients at risk [n]) were: 100 days, 86.0% (n=706); 200 days, 73.9% (n=598); 300 days, 63.3% (n=478); 400 days, 55.5% (n=351); 500 days, 51.1% (n=254); 600 days, 49.0% (n=158); 700 days, 46.7% (n=65); 800 days, 45.1% (n=16).

Monotherapy, Discontinuation, Switching, and Concomitant Medications
  • At 1-year follow-up, 36.2% (reinitiated TREMFYA, 8.4%; switched, 12.9%; discontinued without switching to another drug; 14.9%) of patients met the criteria for discontinuation (>90-day gap) of TREMFYA.
  • At ≥6 months follow-up, 48.5% (reinitiated TREMFYA, 14.1%; switched, 16.9%; discontinued without switching to another drug; 17.5%) of patients met the criteria for discontinuation
    (>90-day gap) of TREMFYA.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Fitzgerald et al (2022)20 compared treatment persistence with TREMFYA vs apremilast among adult patients with PsO in the US.
Patients included were: adult patients with first observed claim for TREMFYA or apremilast (index therapy) between July 13, 2017 and May 01, 2021; continuous health plan eligibility for ≥12 months before the index date; ICD-10-CM diagnoses of PsO on ≥2 dates during the baseline period or on the index date; no claims on the index date for biologic agents indicated for PsO except the index therapy; and no claims on the preindex date for TREMFYA or apremilast within the most recent period of continuous eligibility.
Persistence was defined as absence of gaps in the supply of index therapy of over twice the labeled dosing interval for TREMFYA (>120 days) or more days of supply for apremilast (>60 days).
The discontinuation date was the last day with supply of index therapy before the gap.
Restart among patients who discontinued index therapy was defined as a new claim for the index therapy after the end of the therapy-exposure gap (subset of patients who discontinued was not reweighted).
Switch was defined as a claim for a biologic indicated for PsO that is different from the index therapy.
A total of 3379 patients were included. At baseline, 50.2% of patients were biologic-experienced.
Treatment Persistence
  • The median time to index therapy discontinuationb for TREMFYA was 27.5 months.
  • During follow-up, the probability (95% CI; number of patients at risk [n]c) of persistence for TREMFYA was: 3 months, 91.2% (88.6-93.3; n=2855); 6 months, 82.0% (79.4-84.2; n=2296); 12 months, 67.2% (64.6-69.7; n=1250); 18 months, 59.3% (56.4-62.1; n=756); 24 months, 54.1% (50.7-57.4; n=420).

Restart of Index Therapy
  • Among patients who discontinued index TREMFYA therapy, the probability (95% CI; number of patients at risk [n]c) to restartd was: 3 months, 16.7% (13.1-21.2; n=819); 6 months, 25.3% (21.5-29.7; n=615); 12 months, 32.2% (28.1-36.8; n=366); 18 months, 35.6% (31.1-40.4; n=234); 24 months, 36.5% (31.9-41.5; n=124).

Switch to Nonindex Biologic Therapy
  • During follow-up, the probability (95% CI; number of patients at risk [n]c) of switchinge from TREMFYA to other biologic therapy was: 3 months, 1.3% (0.2-6.2, n=3135); 6 months, 4.5% (2.7-7.5; n=2779); 12 months, 11.1% (9.0-13.8; n=1772); 18 months, 15.7% (13.4-18.4; n=1196); 24 months, 21.2% (18.5-24.2; n=695).

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Xu et al (2020)21 evaluated adherence and persistence of newly initiated biologic therapies, including TREMFYA in a cohort study who received treatment between January 01, 2014-June 30, 2019 in the US.
The following patients were included: patients indexed on biologics for PsO during the intake period; patients with ≥1 PsO diagnosis, patients ≥18 years (pregnant women were excluded); patients without the diagnoses of ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile chronic polyarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, hidradenitis suppurativa, CD, and UC; patients who had continuous enrollment for 6-month preindex and 9-month postindex.
Index date was defined as the claim date of the patient’s first observed biologic fill for PsO for the medication of interest.
The primary cohort consisted of patients with ≥9 months of continuous enrollment, and a 12-month subcohort consisted of a subset of this population with an additional 3 months of continuous enrollment.
PDC was defined as the total days covered during follow-up with respect to the fixed follow-up periods (ie, 3, 6, 9, or 12 months). Patients with PDC ≥80% were considered adherent.
Persistence was defined as being on the index biologic continuously for the first ≥80% of the follow-up period in the 3-, 6-, 9-, or 12-month follow-up time frames.
A total of 821 patients who received TREMFYA were included. At baseline, 15.3% of patients were affected by PsA.
Outcome Measures
  • In the TREMFYA group, the mean total healthcare costs over the 9-month follow-up period was $56,831.
    • The mean number of prescription fills and outpatient visits were 23.1 and 27.5, respectively, and the proportion of patients with ≥1 ER visit and ≥1 inpatient visit were 10.7% and 7.2%, respectively.
  • Label-recommended maintenance dosing interval as the maximum gap (1x gap)
    • Proportion of patients who switched from TREMFYA, discontinued and restarted TREMFYA, or discontinued and started another biologic were 6.2%, 10.0%, and 1.1%, respectively.
    • Proportion of patients who were persistent on TREMFYA at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up periods were 5.0%, 71.7%, 67.8%, and 66.9% of patients, respectively.
  • Twice the label-recommended dosing interval as the maximum gap (2x gap)
    • Proportion of patients who switched TREMFYA, discontinued and restarted TREMFYA, or discontinued and started another biologic were 7.3%, 1.5%, and 0.5%, respectively.
    • Proportion of patients who were persistent on TREMFYA at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up periods were 90.1%, 80.4%, 77.2%, and 76.6% of patients, respectively.
  • Fixed 90-day period as the maximum gap (90-day gap)
    • Proportion of patients who switched TREMFYA, discontinued and restarted TREMFYA, or discontinued and started another biologic were 7.2%, 3.0%, and 0.6%, respectively.
    • Proportion of patients who were persistent on TREMFYA at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12month follow-up periods, 89.3%, 78.6%, 75.2%, and 74.3% of patients were respectively.
  • Proportion of patients in the TREMFYA group with PDC ≥80% at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up periods were 76.9%, 65.2%, 56.9%, and 53.1%, respectively.
  • Outcome results in the 12-month subcohort were generally consistent with the primary 9-month cohort.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Xu et al (2020)22 evaluated healthcare utilization and costs of treatment with TREMFYA, ixekizumab, or secukinumab among patients with PsO who received treatment between January 01, 2014, and June 30, 2019.
The following patients were included: patients indexed on biologics for PsO during the intake period; patients with ≥1 PsO diagnosis; patients ≥18 years old (pregnant women excluded); patients without the diagnoses of ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile chronic polyarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, hidradenitis suppurativa, CD, and UC; and patients with continuous enrollment for 6-month preindex and 9-month postindex.
Index date: The claim date of the patient’s first observed biologic fill for PsO for the medication of interest.
The outcome variables included total healthcare cost (measured in the 9-month follow-up time frame), healthcare utilization (measured using average prescription fills for all medications for PsO, including biologics), average number of outpatient visits, proportion of patients with ≥1 ER visit, and proportion of patients with ≥1 inpatient visit in the 9-month follow-up time frame.
Outcome Measures
  • In the TREMFYA group at 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively:
    • The mean total healthcare costs were $40,824, $56,831, and $72,608.
    • The mean number of prescription refills were 15.5, 23.1, and 30.7.
    • The mean number of outpatient visits were 18.4, 27.5, and 37.3.
    • The proportion of patients with ER visits were 8.3%, 10.7%, and 13.8%.
    • The proportion of patients with inpatient visits were 4.4%, 7.2%, and 8.9%.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Japan Medical Data Center Payer-Based Database
Pinter et al (2022)23 evaluated above-label dosing for IL-inhibitor biologics, including TREMFYA among patients with PsO who received treatment between July 2014 and June 2021 in Japan.
The Japan Medical Data Center Payer-Based Database includes health insurance claims across the continuum of care (eg, inpatient, outpatient, outpatient pharmacy, carve-out behavioral healthcare) as well as enrollment data.
The following patients were included: patients with ≥1 medical claim for PsO based on ICD-10 L40.X codes for an IL inhibitor approved to treat patients with moderate to severe PsO in Japan; patients with ≥3 months of continuous eligibility prior to the earliest IL-inhibitor claim (baseline period); patients with ≥1 IL-inhibitor claim within 7 days following the induction period on each product’s label (earliest maintenance claim defined as the index date); patients with ≥6-12 months of continuous eligibility following the index date (follow-up period); patients who qualified for and were stratified as biologic-naïve or biologic-experienced based on observed preindex biologic claims.
Dose escalation was defined as a ≥20% increase in the observed average daily dose over the expected daily dose with ≥2 claims during the escalated period and was evaluated at 6 and 12 months following the index date.
The expected daily dose for TREMFYA was evaluated by dividing the label-recommended maintenance dose by the treatment interval. The maintenance strength was 100 mg with a maintenance interval of 56 days. The expected daily dose was 1.79 mg/day, and the 20% and 30% dose-escalation thresholds were 2.14 mg/day and 2.33 mg/day, respectively.
A total of 184 patients who received TREMFYA were included. At baseline, 52.9% of patients were biologic-naïve.
Dose Escalation
  • For ≥2 escalated dosing intervals at 6 and 12 months, 1% and 2% of TREMFYA-treated patients, respectively, experienced dose escalation in both >20% and >30% threshold sensitivities.
  • For ≥2 escalated dosing intervals at 6 and 12 months, among the biologic-naïve vs biologic-experienced patients, 1% vs 0% and 3% vs 2% of TREMFYA-treated patients, respectively, had a dose escalation.
  • For ≥1 escalated dosing interval at 6 months, 1% of TREMFYA-patients experienced dose escalation in both >20% and >30% threshold sensitivities.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Puig et al (2022)24 evaluated treatment switching and discontinuation of IL-inhibiting biologics, including TREMFYA among patients with PsO who received treatment between July 2014 through June 2021 in Japan.
The following patients were included: patients with ≥1 medical claim for PsO based on ICD-10 L40.X codes occurring on or before the date of the earliest claim for an IL-inhibitor approved to treat PsO in Japan; patients with ≥1 claim for an IL-inhibitor approved for treatment of PsO in Japan (earliest claim for each product was considered as the index date); and patients with ≥6 months of continuous eligibility prior to the earliest IL-inhibitor claim (baseline period). Patients were included in each treatment cohort for which they qualified.
Switching was defined as a claim for another biologic approved for PsO in Japan anytime after the index date.
Discontinuation was defined as a gap in treatment equal to 150% of the days’ supply of the last prescription fill.
A total of 263 patients were included. At baseline, 72.5% of patients were biologic-naïve.
Treatment Switch and Drug Discontinuation
  • In the TREMFYA group, at 12 and 24 months, rates of treatment switching were 16% and 21%, respectively, and rates of discontinuation were 32% and 45%, respectively.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Merative® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Research Databases (Results specific to TREMFYA are summarized below)
Zhdanava et al (2024)25 evaluated the real-world treatment persistence and remission rates with TREMFYA vs secukinumab and TREMFYA vs ixekizumab among patients with PsO and data available between January 1, 2016 - October 31, 2021.
Patients included in the persistence analysis were: adult patients with first observed claim for TREMFYA, secukinumab, or ixekizumab between July 13, 2017 and May 01, 2021; continuous health plan eligibility for ≥12 months before the index date; ICD-10-CM diagnoses of PsO on ≥2 dates during the baseline period or on the index date; no claims on the index date of biologic agents indicated for PsO except the index therapy; and no claims for index biologic during the most recent period of continuous eligibility and before index date.
  • In addition to the inclusion criteria for the persistence analysis, patients in adherence analysis were required to have ≥6, 12, 18, and 24 months of continuous health plan eligibility after the index date.
  • Patients in the remission analysis represented a subset of those in the persistence analysis.
    • Patients had discontinued the index biologic for ≥6 months and had ≥6 months of continuous health plan eligibility after the discontinuation date (new index).

Persistence Analysis
Persistence was based on the absence of gaps in index therapy supply of ≥2 times the labeled maintenance dosing interval for TREMFYA (>120 days) or secukinumab and ixekizumab (>60 days).
To analyze persistence, the index date was defined as the first observed claim for the index biologic. The discontinuation date was the last day with supply of index therapy before the gap.
A total of 3516 vs 6066 patients were included in the TREMFYA vs weighted secukinumab cohort and 3805 vs 4674 patients in the TREMFYA vs weighted ixekizumab cohort. At baseline, 37.4% of patients in the TREMFYA vs secukinumab cohort, and 41.1% of patients in the TREMFYA vs ixekizumab cohort, had prior biologic use.
  • When compared with the weighted secukinumab cohort, median time to discontinuationb for TREMFYA was 29.2 months.
    • During follow-up, the probability (95% CI; number of patients at risk [n]c) of persistence for TREMFYA was: 3 months, 91.2% (88.6-93.2; n=2980); 6 months, 82.7% (80.2-84.9; n=2430); 12 months, 69.1% (66.5-71.5; n=1371); 18 months, 61.5% (58.7-64.2; n=823); 24 months, 55.4% (52.0-58.6; n=431).26
  • When compared with the weighted ixekizumab cohort, the median time to discontinuationb for TREMFYA was 28.9 months.
    • During follow-up, the probability (95% CI; number of patients at risk [n]c) of persistence for TREMFYA was: 3 months, 91.5% (89.0-93.4; n=3236); 6 months, 82.5% (80.1-84.6; n=2626); 12 months, 68.6% (66.1-70.9; n=1454); 18 months, 60.7% (58.0-63.3; n=881); 24 months, 54.8% (51.5-57.9; n=471).26

Adherence Analysis
Adherence was defined as the PDC, which is the recommended measure for assessing adherence to chronic therapies. PDC is calculated as the sum of nonoverlapping days of supply of the index agent divided by a fixed period (ie, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months) among patients who were followed up for at least the same fixed duration.
To analyze adherence, a fixed follow-up period was established after the index date (i.e., 6, 12, 18, and 24 months), and only patients who were followed for at least the same duration were included in the analysis.
TREMFYA vs weighted secukinumab cohort:
  • During follow-up, PDC, mean±SD [median] for TREMFYA was: 6 months, 0.77±0.23 [0.84], n=3047; 12 months, 0.70±0.25 [0.79], n=2147; 18 months, 0.65±0.27 [0.74], n=1540; 24 months, 0.60±0.28 [0.69]; n=936.26

TREMFYA vs weighted ixekizumab cohort:
  • During follow-up, PDC, mean±SD [median] for TREMFYA was: 6 months, 0.77±0.22 [0.84], n=3304; 12 months, 0.70±0.26 [0.79], n=2310; 18 months, 0.64±0.28 [0.73], n=1676; 24 months, 0.60±0.29 [0.68]; n=1042.26

Remission Analysis
Remission was defined as the absence of any PsO-related inpatient admissions or claims for psoriasis-related topical, non-biologic systemic, or other biologic agents during the 6-month period following the discontinuation date of the index biologic.
Partial remission or remission of moderate-to-severe PsO was defined similarly but allowed patients to have claims for topical agents for milder disease.
To analyze remission, the index date was defined as the date when patients discontinued their index biologic for a period of ≥6 months.
A total of 915 vs 2694 patients were included in the TREMFYA vs weighted secukinumab cohort, and 1019 vs 1434 patients in the TREMFYA vs weighted ixekizumab cohort. Twelve months prior to index treatment, 41.3% of patients in both the TREMFYA and weighted secukinumab cohorts, and 45.9% of patients in both the TREMFYA and weighted ixekizumab cohorts, were biologic-experienced.
TREMFYA vs weighted secukinumab cohort:
  • At 6 months of follow-up, 45.8% and 34.9% of patients achieved remission, while 61.3% and 49.8% of patients achieved partial remission in the TREMFYA and secukinumab cohorts, respectively.
  • Patients receiving TREMFYA were 31% and 23% more likely to achieve remission and partial remission, respectively (P<0.001).

TREMFYA vs weighted ixekizumab cohort:
  • At 6 months of follow-up, 43.7% and 31.1% of patients achieved remission, while 58.6% and 47.9% of patients achieved partial remission in the TREMFYA and ixekizumab cohorts, respectively.
  • Patients receiving TREMFYA were 40% and 22% more likely to achieve remission and partial remission, respectively (P<0.001).

Switch to Nonindex Biologic Therapy27
Switch was defined as a claim for a biologic indicated for PsO that is different from the index therapy.
  • During follow-up, when compared with the weighted secukinumab cohort, the probability (95% CI; number of patients at risk [n]) of switchinge from TREMFYA to a nonindex biologic therapy was: 3 months, 0.9% (0.1-6.0; n=3285); 6 months, 3.6% (1.9-6.7; n=2934); 12 months, 9.0% (7.0-11.6; n=1929); 18 months, 12.9% (10.7-15.5; n=1290); 24 months, 17.8% (15.3-20.6; n=734).
  • When compared with the weighted ixekizumab cohort, the probability (95% CI; number of patients at risk [n]) of switchinge from TREMFYA to a nonindex biologic therapy was: 3 months, 1.0% (0.1-5.9; n=3551); 6 months, 3.9% (2.2-6.8; n=3171); 12 months, 9.6% (7.6-12.1; n=2051); 18 months, 14.1% (11.9-16.6; n=1378); 24 months, 19.8% (17.3-22.6; n=791).

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Armstrong et al (2023)28 evaluated the rates of switching to a new therapy and associated characteristics in adult patients with PsO who initiated biologics.
Switch rate was defined as the proportion of patients who switched to a new targeted immune modulator (biologic or apremilast) over the 24-month follow-up after treatment initiation. A total of 1400 patients who received TREMFYA were included.28
Treatment Switch Rates
  • At 12 months, the proportion of patients on TREMFYA who did not switch and those who switched was 91.8% (95% CI, 90.3-93.3) and 8.2%, respectively.
  • At 24 months, the proportion of patients on TREMFYA who did not switch and those who switched was 84.3% (95% CI, 81.9-86.8) and 15.7% (P<0.0001), respectively.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Wu et al (2023)29 evaluated dose-escalation rates during the maintenance period of biologics, including TREMFYA, among patients with moderate to severe PsO in the US who received treatment between April 23, 2019, and June 30, 2021.
Dose escalation was defined as ≥2 dosing intervals, with an average daily dose (total strength [mg] divided by days between subsequent doses) ≥30% higher than the expected daily dose (based on product-specific dosing per the FDA label) during the maintenance period.
A total of 719 patients on TREMFYA were included in the analysis, of whom 24.3% were biologic-experienced.
Dose Escalation
  • The mean duration of maintenance treatment for TREMFYA was 352.1 days.
  • The proportion of patients with dose escalation with TREMFYA during the full maintenance period, first 6 months, and first 12 months was 7.2%, 4.2%, and 7.3%, respectively.
  • The average number of dose-escalated claims above the 30% threshold in the full maintenance period, first 6 months, and first 12 months was 3.0, 2.5, and 3.0, respectively.
    • The average dose magnitude among dose escalated claims during the full maintenance period, first 6 months, and first 12 months was 55.7%, 54.0%, and 53.0%, respectively.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Modernizing Medicine Data Services Database
Fitzgerald et al (2022)30 described the demographic and clinical characteristics and prior treatments among adult patients with moderate to severe PsO who received treatment with TREMFYA, secukinumab, or ixekizumab between July 1, 2017, and March 31, 2019.
Patients included were adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis newly treated with TREMFYA, secukinumab, or ixekizumab. At baseline, the mean±SD BMI was 31.6±7.6 kg/m2 and mean±SD BSA involvement was 23.1%±20.2. The mean±SD PGA score was 3.1±0.7.
Patient Characteristics
  • A total of 461 patients receiving TREMFYA, 619 patients receiving secukinumab, and 375 patients receiving ixekizumab were included who had a mean age of 50.6 years (SD, 13.8), 50.7 years (SD, 14.8), and 50.7 years (SD, 15.1), respectively. Across groups, the proportion of male and female patients was comparable, and most patients were White (65.4–68.8%).
  • Across groups, >25% of patients had a BMI of 25-29.9 kg/m2 (both inclusive) and >50% of patients had a BMI of ≥30 kg/m2. Comorbidities included cardiovascular disease (39.3-41.4%), musculoskeletal disease (21.0-25.5%), metabolic disease (18.4-20.0%), and psychiatric disorders (20.8-24.2%). Current or past smokers comprised 39.7%, 48.6%, and 42.1% of patients receiving TREMFYA, secukinumab, and ixekizumab, respectively.
  • Median baseline BSA ranged from 15-20% and 16.1-29.3% of patients had a PGA score of 4.

Prior Treatments
  • Topical corticosteroids: 84.2% of patients.
  • Systemic corticosteroids: 22.3% of patients.
  • Prior biologics: 55.1% of patients (adalimumab, 28.2%; etanercept, 10.6%; ustekinumab, 32.5%).

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
PsoRA (Psoriasis Registry Austria)
Graier et al (2022)31 evaluated the effectiveness of IL23 inhibitors, including TREMFYA, among adult patients with chronic plaque PsO who received treatment between March 23, 2018, and February 04, 2021, in Austria.
The effectiveness of biologic therapy was evaluated in terms of change in absolute PASI score and reduction in PASI response (defined as categories ranging from complete remission [ie, PASI 100] to partial remission [ie, PASI 90, PASI 75, PASI 50, PASI <50] to worsening) by status of biologic exposure (biologic-naïve or nonnaïve) and by the class of previous biologic therapy.
For further analysis, irrespective of treatment discontinuation, change in PASI score was evaluated as observed and with respect to the LOCF worst-case scenario (ie, considering the last known PASI score or PASI reduction response to be continued or patients to be considered nonresponders [PASI <50 response]).
A total of 127 treatment cycles of TREMFYA were included. At baseline, mean±SD PASI scores were 9.63±6.59 and 7.80±7.52 in biologic naïve and biologic nonnaive patients, respectively; 42.5% of patients were biologic naïve; and 55.4%, 18.9%, and 25.7% of patients had previously received 1, 2, and 3 biologic therapies, respectively.
Efficacy
  • At treatment initiation, mean±SD PASI score was 8.42±7.13 in the TREMFYA group.
  • Over 12 months, mean±SD PASI score (as observed) decreased continuously (baseline, 8.42±7.13; 3 months, 1.82±3.34; 6 months, 1.93±3.90; 12 months, 1.22±2.84).32
  • The observed PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 (complete response) rates were 80.6%, 60.2%, 39.8%, and 27.8%, respectively, at 3 months and were 83.4%, 76.7%, 61.7%, and 46.7%, respectively, at 12 months.

Safety
  • Among patients receiving TREMFYA (n=127), 19 (14.96%) AEs were reported, including infections (n=16; 12.60%), gastrointestinal symptoms (n=1; 0.79%), neurological symptoms (n=1; 0.79%), and rash (n=1; 0.79%).
  • Within the first year, 12.6% of patients in the TREMFYA group discontinued treatment.

Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Symphony Health Claims Database
Fitzgerald et al (2021)33 described baseline characteristics of patients with PsO in the US who were initiated on TREMFYA in the first year after FDA approval.
The Symphony Health Claims database includes US pharmacy, diagnosis, and procedure claims collected through electronic claims processors, commercial sources, and government sources.
The following patients were included: patients with ≥2 PsO diagnoses separated by ≥30 days between October 01, 2012 and August 31, 2018; patients with ≥1 approved claim for TREMFYA not coded as a pharmacy refill between July 13, 2017 and July 02, 2018; patients with index date ≥60 days before the end of study period; patients with age ≥18 years at index; patients who met proxy, ie, ≥1 claim more than 365 days before index date and ≥1 claim during the 365 days before index date; patients who met proxy, ie, ≥1 pharmacy claim of any kind after the index date; excluded patients with potential claim issues such as multiple claims for different biologics on index date, inconsistent pharmacy-entered day supplies, or uninterpretable quantities; index date: defined as date of first pharmacy claim for TREMFYA
The baseline period was defined as the 365-day period prior to the index date.
A total of 1520 patients were included; 63.9% of patients had ≥1 biologic drug claim during baseline period; 66.9% were prescribed topical corticosteroid/combinations during baseline period; most common non-PsO diagnoses among patients with ≥1 medical claim were hypertension (25.1%), type-2 diabetes (13.4%), and hyperlipidemia (13.4%).
Note: Click on Abbreviations to view all abbreviations and footnotes.
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; BADBIR, British Association of Dermatologists’ Biologic Interventions Register; BMI, body mass index; BSA, body surface area; CD, Crohn’s disease; CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; ER, emergency room; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; HR, hazard ratio; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; ICD-10-CM, International Classification of Diseases-10 Clinical Modification; ICD-10 L40, International Classification of Diseases-10 code for psoriasis; IL17, interleukin-17; IL12/23, interleukin-12/23; IQR, interquartile range; KM, Kaplan Meier; LOCF, last observation carried forward; MPR, medication possession ratio; NAPSI, Nail Psoriasis Severity Index; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI 100, 100% improvement in PASI from baseline; PASI 75, ≥75% improvement in PASI from baseline; PASI 90, ≥90% improvement in PASI from baseline; PDC, proportion of days covered; PGA, Physician’s Global Assessment; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; PsO, psoriasis; PY, patient year; QoL, quality of life; SAE, serious adverse event; SC, subcutaneously; SD, standard deviation; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; UC, ulcerative colitis; US, United States; VAS, visual analog scale.
aData shown only for time points when ≥40 patients were at risk for drug discontinuation.
bTime to treatment discontinuation (or persistence end) was measured from the index date until the discontinuation date. Patients who did not discontinue during the follow-up period were censored on the last day of index agent supply before the end of follow-up.
cPatients at risk of having the event are the patients who have not had the event and have not been lost to follow-up at that point in time.
dTime to restart was measured from the end of therapy-exposure gap until the restart date. Patients without restart during the follow-up period were censored at the end of follow-up.
eTime to switch was measured from the index date until the switch date. Patients without switch during the follow-up period were censored at the end of follow-up.

LITERATURE SEARCH

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 17 May 2024.

Summarized in this response are plaque PsO-specific data available from real world retrospective (≥100 patients and a follow-up duration of ≥1 year) and registry-based studies that evaluated the use of TREMFYA in adult patients with plaque PsO.

 

References

1 Gargiulo L, Ibba L, Malagoli P, et al. Drug survival of IL-12/23, IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a retrospective multicenter real-world experience on 5932 treatment courses – IL PSO (Italian landscape psoriasis). Front Immunol. 2024;14:1341708.  
2 Sullivan J, Hannam S, Puig A, et al. Real‐world treatment persistence of four commonly prescribed biologic therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis in Australia. Australas J Dermatol. 2023;64(4):504-513.  
3 Galluzzo M, Marcelli L, Velluci L, et al. Guselkumab for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: real-life effectiveness and drug-survival for up to 148 weeks. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2023;23(4):371-381.  
4 Bardazzi F, Viviani F, Merli Y, et al. Guselkumab for the treatment of psoriasis: a 60-week real-life multicenter retrospective experience. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2022;22(12):1561-1566.  
5 Del Alcázar E, López-Ferrer A, Martínez-Doménech A, et al. Survival of guselkumab therapy in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis at 52 weeks in a real-world clinical setting: observational, retrospective, multicentre study by the Spanish Psoriasis Group. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(6):2878-2880.  
6 Galluzzo M, Talamonti M, Bernardini N, et al. Real-world outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with guselkumab for up to 1 year. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2022;22(12):1585-1592.  
7 Jung SW, Lim SH, Jeon JJ, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of biologics (secukinumab, ustekinumab, and guselkumab) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: real-world data from a single Korean center. Biomedicines. 2022;10(5):1058.  
8 Mälkönen T, Nuutinen P, Hallinen T, et al. Supplement to: Guselkumab treatment outcomes and persistence in a nationwide real-world cohort of patients with plaque psoriasis. Acta Derm-Venereol. 2022;102:adv00631.  
9 Ruiz-Villaverde R, Rodriguez-Fernandez-Freire L, Armario-Hita JC, et al. Guselkumab as a switching strategy after anti-TNFα, anti-IL17,or anti-IL12/23 therapies in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(10):e15760.  
10 Torres T, Puig L, Vender R, et al. Drug survival of IL-12/23, IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors for psoriasis treatment: a retrospective multi-country, multicentric cohort study. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021;22(4):567-579.  
11 Ghislain PD, Failla V, Lambert J, et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis: A longitudinal Belgian retrospective multicenter study. JAAD Int. 2021;4:15-17.  
12 Lytvyn Y, Zaaroura H, Mufti A, et al. Drug survival of guselkumab in patients with plaque psoriasis: a 2 year retrospective, multicenter study. JAAD Int. 2021;4:49-51.  
13 Ruiz-Villaverde R. Efficiency and survival of guselkumab attending to demographic characteristics and comorbidities in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Oral presentation presented at: European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology; September 29-October 02, 2021; Virtual.  
14 Ismail F, Armstrong J, Vogrin S, et al. Real-world evidence for guselkumab treatment of severe psoriasis: a sub-group analysis of efficacy and drug survival from the Australasian Psoriasis Registry. Poster presented at: Australasian College of Dermatologists (ACD) Annual Scientific Meeting (ASM); May 27-29, 2023; Sydney, Australia.  
15 Savage L, Wang X, Johnson D, et al. One-year real-world effectiveness of guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: analysis from the BADBIR [abstract]. Br J Dermatol. 2022;187(S1, Suppl. 1)(S1):76. Abstract P88.  
16 Hugo J, Kojanova M, Turkova B, et al. Long-term efficacy, safety, and drug survival of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis: real-world data from the Czech Republic BIOREP registry. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023;13(3):787-801.  
17 Fitzgerald T, Zhdanava M, Pilon D, et al. Long-term psoriasis control with guselkumab, adalimumab, secukinumab, or ixekizumab in the USA. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023;13(4):1053-1068.  
18 Zhdanava M, Fitzgerald T, Pilon D, et al. Long term psoriasis control with guselkumab versus secukinumab and ixekizumab among bio- experienced patients: analysis of drug persistence in large claims database. Poster presented at: European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Congress; October 11-14, 2023; Berlin, Germany.  
19 Blauvelt A, Burge R, Gallo G, et al. A retrospective cohort analysis of treatment patterns over 1 year in patients with psoriasis treated with ixekizumab or guselkumab. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022;12(3):701-714.  
20 Fitzgerald T, Zhdanava M, Pilon D, et al. Long term psoriasis control with guselkumab versus apremilast: analysis of drug persistence and other treatment patterns in large claims database. Poster presented at: European Academy of Dermatology and Venereolgy (EADV) Congress; September 7-11, 2022; Milano, Italy.  
21 Xu C, Teeple A, Wu B, et al. Adherence/persistence of seven commonly prescribed medications for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in a US commercial population. Poster presented at: Annual Research Meeting (ARM); July 28-August 06, 2020; Virtual.  
22 Xu C, Teeple A, Wu B, et al. Healthcare utilization and cost of three psoriasis treatments in a US commercial population. Poster presented at: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Nexus; October 29-November 01, 2020; Virtual.  
23 Pinter A, Soliman AM, Davis M, et al. Dose escalation of biologic treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Japan. Poster presented at: European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Congress; September 7-10, 2022; Milan, Italy.  
24 Puig L, Soliman AM, Davis M, et al. Real-world switching and discontinuation patterns for interleukin-inhibitor treatments in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis in Japan. Poster presented at: European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Congress; September 07-10, 2022; Milan, Italy.  
25 Zhdanava M, Fitzgerald T, Pilon D, et al. Comparative analysis of persistence and remission with guselkumab versus secukinumab and ixekizumab in the United States. J Dermatolog Treat. 2024;35(1):2349658.  
26 Zhdanava M, Fitzgerald T, Pilon D, et al. Supplement to: Comparative analysis of persistence and remission with guselkumab versus secukinumab and ixekizumab in the United States. J Dermatolog Treat. 2024;35(1):2349658.  
27 Zhdanava M, Fitzgerald T, Pilon D, et al. Long term psoriasis control with guselkumab versus secukinumab and ixekizumab: analysis of drug persistence in large claims database. Poster presented at: European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Congress; September 7-11, 2022; Milano, Italy.  
28 Armstrong AW, Patel M, Li C, et al. Real-world switching patterns and associated characteristics in patients with psoriasis treated with biologics in the United States. J Dermatolog Treat. 2023;34(1):2200870.  
29 Wu JJ, Patel M, Zeng F, et al. Real-world dose escalation of biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the United States. J Dermatolog Treat. 2023;34(1):2200869.  
30 Fitzgerald T, Near AM, Kim H, et al. Characteristics of new biologic users among the moderate-to-severe psoriasis population-retrospective cohort study leveraging the Modernizing Medicine Data Services Database. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022;12(3):741-752.  
31 Graier T, Weger W, Jonak C, et al. Real-world effectiveness of anti-interleukin-23 antibodies in chronic plaque-type psoriasis of patients from the Austrian Psoriasis Registry (PsoRA). Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):15078.  
32 Graier T, Weger W, Jonak C, et al. Supplement to: Real-world effectiveness of anti-interleukin-23 antibodies in chronic plaque-type psoriasis of patients from the Austrian Psoriasis Registry (PsoRA). Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):15078.  
33 Fitzgerald T, Teeple A, Slaton T, et al. Characteristics of Patients Initiating Guselkumab for Plaque Psoriasis in the Symphony Health Claims Database. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(10):1127-1131.