This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

TREMFYA – Treatment of Genital Psoriasis

Last Updated: 04/30/2024

SUMMARY  

  • The company cannot recommend any practices, procedures or usage that deviate from the approved labeling.
  • Please refer to the local labeling on approved uses of TREMFYA.
  • Interim results of the GULLIVER study summarized the effectiveness and safety of TREMFYA in adult patients with facial and/or genital psoriasis (PsO) in real-world settings.1
  • Additional observational studies and a case report have reported on the use of TREMFYA for the treatment of genital PsO.2-4

CLINICAL DATA

Observational Study (GULLIVER)

Bonifati et al (2023)1 presented the 12- and 28-week interim results of the GULLIVER study, evaluating the effectiveness and safety of TREMFYA in adult patients with genital and/or facial PsO in real-world settings in Italy.

Study Design/Methods

  • Adult patients with PsO requiring systemic treatment with a significant involvement (static physician global assessment [sPGA] score of ≥3) of the genital and/or facial area receiving TREMFYA were included in the study.
  • Select inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years with confirmed PsO, requiring systemic treatment with significant involvement of the facial and/or genital regions; enrolled any time after the first injection of TREMFYA but before completion of the next scheduled visit at week 4 or 12 per common clinical practice.5
  • Select exclusion criteria: contraindication to the use of TREMFYA, as stated in the current summary of product characteristics of the product approved in Italy; received an investigational drug (including investigational vaccines) or used an invasive investigational medical device within 30 days before the start of TREMFYA treatment.5
  • Effectiveness was evaluated using sPGA score (clear, 0; almost clear, 1; mild, 2; moderate to severe, 4; severe, 5) in the individual components (erythema, scaling, thickness).
  • The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients achieving sPGA score 0/1 and ≥2 grade improvement for the genital and facial regions at week 52.5
  • The select secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients achieving sPGA score 0/1 and ≥2 grade improvement for the genital region at weeks 12 and 28.5

Results

Baseline Patient Characteristics
  • A total of 204/351 patients with genital PsO were included in the interim analysis. See Table: Baseline Characteristics from GULLIVER.

Baseline Characteristics from GULLIVER1
Characteristic
Genital PsO
(n=204)
Sex, male, n (%)
121 (59.3)
Age, years, mean (SD)
47.4 (15.7)
BMI, mean, kg/m2
26.8
Time from diagnosis to first dose of TREMFYA, years, mean (SD)
15.0 (11.7)
Patients with ≥3 years of PsO, n (%)
182 (89.2)
Patients who received ≥1 prior therapy for PsO, n (%)
188 (92.2)
Patients with prior biologic therapy, n (%)
83 (40.7)
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; PsO, psoriasis; SD, standard deviation.
Effectiveness at Weeks 12 and 28

Proportion of Patients with an sPGA Score of 0/1 in the sPGA Individual Components1,a
Components
Genital PsO
Week 12
   Thickness, %
82.1
   Scaling, %
84.6
   Erythema, %
78.0
Week 28
   Thickness, %
94.0
   Scaling, %
96.7
   Erythema, %
93.7
Abbreviations: PsO, psoriasis; sPGA, static physician global assessment. aCalculated in patients with a moderate to severe score at baseline.
Safety

No new safety signals were identified at Week 12.6

Retrospective Study

Mastorino et al (2023)2 evaluated the effectiveness of anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 agents, including TREMFYA, in difficult-to-treat psoriasis areas in a retrospective, observational, real-world study.

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients with psoriasis who were treated with an anti-IL-17 (secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab) or anti-IL-23 (TREMFYA, risankizumab, tildrakizumab) agent were identified from the University of Turin Psocare SS-Dermo-20 registry during January 2017 to June 2022.
  • Included patients presented with at least one of the difficult-to-treat areas of genital, scalp, and palmoplantar sites.
  • Patients with missing data at baseline were not included.
  • All patients received anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 agents at the approved local labeling dosage and underwent a washout period of previous biologic treatment.
  • For patients with genital psoriasis, static Physician’s Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) was observed.

Results


Baseline Characteristics of Anti-IL-17 and Anti-IL-23 Agents2
SEC
(n=32)
IXE
(n=30)
BRO
(n=47)
TREMFYA
(n=13)
RIS
(n=9)
TIL
(n=5)
P-value
Age, years, medium ± SD
55 ± 17.7
55 ± 14.1
48 ± 14
41 ± 11.7
52 ± 14.7
58 ± 22
0.072
Age at diagnosis, years, medium ± SD
33 ± 22.1
33 ± 17.8
29 ± 12
28 ± 13.1
33 ± 16.9
49 ± 19.9
0.306
Male, %
62.5
76.7
70
50
77.8
60
0.588
PsA, %
40.6
36.7
26
20
22.2
20
0.785
BMI ≥30, %
18.8
30
24
10
11.1
0
0.096
Bio-naïve, %
59.3
73.3
66
100
66.7
80
0.245
sPGA-Ga, mean ± SD
3 ± 0.8
3 ± 0.8
2.2 ± 1
3 ± 1
3 ± 1
4 ± 1
0.001
Abbreviations: Bio-naïve, biologic naïve; BMI, body mass index; BRO, brodalumab; IXE, ixekizumab; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; RIS, risankizumab; SD, standard deviation; SEC, secukinumab; sPGA-G, static Physician’s Global Assessment of Genitalia; TIL, tildrakizumab.asPGA-G range of 0-5.

Mean sPGA-Ga and sPGA-G 0/1 Results at Weeks 16, 28, and 522
SEC
IXE
BRO
TREMFYA
RIS
TIL
P-value
Week 16
Mean sPGA-G ± SD
1 ± 0.8
1 ± 0.8
0.22 ± 1
1 ± 1
1 ± 1
1 ± 1
0.002
sPGA-G 0/1, n/N (%)
21/32
(65.6%)
20/25
(73.3%)
40/47
(85%)
7/13
(53.9%)
7/9
(77.8%)
5/5
(100%)
0.15
Week 28
Mean sPGA-G ± SD
1 ± 0.6
1 ± 0.7
0.15 ± 1
1 ± 1
1 ± 1
0 ± 1
0.012
sPGA-G 0/1, n/N (%)
30/32
(93.8%)
23/25
(93.3%)
47/47
(100%)
12/13
(92.3%)
7/9
(77.8%)
5/5
(100%)
0.184
Week 52
Mean sPGA-G ± SD
0 ± 0.6
0 ± 0.6
0.13 ± 1
0 ± 1
1 ± 1
0 ± 1
0.32
sPGA-G 0/1, n/N (%)
31/32
(96.9%)
23/24
(95.8%)
47/47
(100%)
12/13
(92.3%)
8/9
(88.9%)
3/3
(100%)
0.55
Abbreviations: Bio-naïve, biologic naïve; BMI, body mass index; BRO, brodalumab; IXE, ixekizumab; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; RIS, risankizumab; SD, standard deviation; SEC, secukinumab; sPGA-G, static Physician’s Global Assessment of Genitalia; TIL, tildrakizumab.asPGA-G range of 0-5.

Prospective Study (PSoHO)

Piaserico et al (2023)3 reported week 12 results from Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO), an international, prospective, non-interventional study, that compared the effectiveness of biologics in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and special area involvement.

Study Design/Methods

  • The PSoHO study enrolled adult patients from 23 countries with a confirmed diagnosis of moderate to severe psoriasis (≥6 months from baseline) and with special area involvement of the scalp, genital, nails, face, and/or neck, or palms and/or soles. Patients initiated or switched biologic treatment during routine medical care.
  • Analysis for this study included treatment groups with more than 100 patients: ixekizumab, secukinumab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, TREMFYA, and risankizumab.
  • Analyses were completed for patients with special area involvement at baseline and a valid result at week 12.

Results


PSoHO Baseline Demographics and Diseases Characteristics3
IXE
(n=532)
SEC
(n=241)
TREMFYA
(n=303)
RIS
(n=259)
ADA
(n=284)
UST
(n=127)
Age, years, mean (SD)
47.4
(14.1)
45.4
(12.8)
44.2
(13.2)a
44.1
(13.7)b
45.1
(13.0)b
46.4
(14.5)
Disease duration, median years (Q1, Q3)
13.9
(6.7, 25.3)
14.9
(6.0, 21.8)
14.9
(7.8, 24.4)
13.7
(8.2, 23.5)
14.2
(6.3, 25.0)
12.1
(6.3, 23.7)
Male, n (%)
313
(58.8)
129
(53.5)
179
(59.1)
161
(62.2)
163
(57.4)
77
(60.6)
BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD)
29.4
(6.6)
28.9
(6.5)
29.0
(6.7)
28.6
(6.9)
29.3
(6.6)
28.0
(5.6)b
PASI, mean (SD)
14.4
(8.5)
15.0
(8.7)
14.6
(9.3)
15.4
(9.8)
13.3
(7.1)
14.4
(7.9)
sPGA, n (%)
Moderate
267
(50.6)
120
(50.8)
143
(47.7)
102
(40.8)b
170
(60.5)b
68
(54.8)
Severe
176
(33.3)
66
(28.0)
101
(33.7)
93
(37.2)
69
(24.6)b
37
(29.8)
Very severe
16
(3.0)
18
(7.6)b
14
(4.7)
15
(6.0)
5
(1.8)
2
(1.6)
Number of patients with baseline data for special area involvementc
n=532
n=241
n=302
n=258
n=284
n=126
Patients with baseline genital involvementd, n (%)
154
(28.9)
51
(21.2)b
82
(27.2)
47
(18.2)b
73
(25.7)
31
(24.6)
Abbreviations: ADA, adalimumab; BMI, body mass index; IXE, ixekizumab; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; RIS, risankizumab; SEC, secukinumab; SD, sPGA-G, static Physician’s Global Assessment of Genitalia; UST, ustekinumab.Note: In cases of n (%) not matching the total in the group, the remainder is attributable to missing data for patients. Pairwise comparisons performed using Fisher’s exact test or chi-square for categorical variables and analysis of variance (ANOVA) or exact P-value from the median test (Monte Carlo estimate) for continuous variables.aP<0.001 vs IXE.bP<0.05 vs IXE.cInformation about special area involvement missing for 3 patients.dSpecial area involvement was recorded as a yes/no question (investigator assessed).

Unadjusted Genital Clearance Response Rates and Comparative Adjusted Odds Ratios of Ixekizumab vs Other Biologics in Patients with Baseline Genital Involvement at Week 123
IXE
SEC
TREMFYA
RIS
ADA
UST
Genital clearance response, % (n/N)
82.5 (127/154)
86.3 (44/51)
74.4 (61/82)
80.9 (38/47)
78.1 (57/73)
61.3 (19/31)
Adjusted odds ratio comparison of IXE to biologics (95% CI)
-
0.8
(0.3-1.5)
1.7
(1.0a-3.3)
1.0
(0.6-2.2)
1.3
(0.7-2.9)
2.6
(1.1-6.4)
Abbreviations: ADA, adalimumab; CI, confidence interval; IXE, ixekizumab; RIS, risankizumab; SEC, secukinumab; UST, ustekinumab.Notes: Comparative results are statistically significant if 95% CIs of the odds ratios do not cover 1. Missing outcome data were imputed as non-response.aDenotes that the lower CI is <1.0: The lower CI for the IXE compared to TREMFYA odds ratio for genital clearance is 0.952.

Case Report

Galluzzo et al (2020)4 described a case of a male patient with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque PsO in the genital region from a retrospective longitudinal study of 52 patients.

Study Design/Methods

  • Data from patients with moderate-to-severe plaque PsO who were treated with TREMFYA for at least 12 weeks from November 2018 to March 2020 were reviewed retrospectively over a period of 12 months (52 weeks).
  • Fifty-two-week data were not available for all patients due to different time of treatment initiation during the study.
  • Patients with moderate-to-severe PsO (Psoriasis Area Severity Index [PASI] >10) who had treatment failure, had side effects or were contraindicated to at least one conventional treatment, including systemic therapy or phototherapy were included.
  • Patients with a baseline PASI <10 and involvement of sensitive areas (i.e., face, scalp, hands, or genital) were also included.
  • Patients with other autoimmune/inflammatory diseases (i.e., Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and ankylosing arthritis), patients who had less than 4 weeks of biologic treatment or had received systemic treatment or phototherapy in combination with biologic agent within 4 weeks of the first visit, and patients with guttate, erythrodermic, or pustular psoriasis were excluded.
  • TREMFYA 100 mg was administered subcutaneously at weeks 0 and 4, and every 8 weeks thereafter.
  • Measured outcomes included PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 at week 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52.
  • Safety, tolerability, clinical laboratory tests and vital signs were evaluated over the duration of the study.

Results

Efficacy in Difficult-to-Treat Locations
  • A male patient with psoriasis in the suprapubic area and penis foreskin, umbilicus/periumbilical, and perianal regions experienced complete clearance (PASI 100) of plaques after 12 weeks of treatment with TREMFYA.
Safety
  • Treatment with TREMFYA was well-tolerated among 52 patients with no evidence of cumulative toxicity or organ toxicity.
  • No discontinuation due to adverse events was reported.
  • Clinical laboratory tests and control of vital signs showed no alteration.

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 04 April 2024.

 

References

1 Bonifati C, Romanelli M, Corazza M, et al. Effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in patients with facial and/or genital psoriasis: interim results up to week 28 from the GULLIVER study. Poster presented at: European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2023; October 11-14, 2023; Berlin, Germany.  
2 Mastorino L, Burzi L, Frigatti G, et al. Clinical effectiveness of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors on difficult-to-treat psoriasis areas (scalp, genital, and palmoplantar sites): a retrospective, observational, single-center, real-life study. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2023;23(9):929-936.  
3 Piaserico S, Riedl E, Pavlovsky L, et al. Comparative effectiveness of biologics for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and special area involvement: week 12 results from the observational Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO). Front Med. 2023;10:no pagination.  
4 Galluzzo M, Tofani L, Lombardo P, et al. Use of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A 1 Year Real-Life Study. J Clin Medicine. 2020;9(7):2170.  
5 Janssen-Cilag S.p.A. A study of guselkumab in naive or bio-experienced participants with regional (facial and genital) psoriasis (GULLIVER). In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2023 August 22]. Available from: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04439526 NLM Identifier: NCT04439526.  
6 Bonifati C, Bardazzi F, Potenza C, et al. Effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in patients with facial and/or genital psoriasis: interim analysis results at week 12 from the GULLIVER study. Poster presented at: Maui Derm Hawaii 2023; January 23-27, 2023; Grand Wailea Maui, Hawaii.