This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

Rationale for Once-Daily Dosing of XARELTO for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Last Updated: 09/23/2024

Summary

  • The selection of the 20-mg once-daily dose for XARELTO in the ROCKET AF study was based primarily on the results of the 2 phase 2, dose-ranging studies evaluating XARELTO for the treatment of acute, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT).1-3
    • These studies demonstrated that once and twice-daily doses from 20 mg to 60 mg per day were comparable, based on efficacy and safety results. Based on this data, the lowest dose of 20 mg once daily was chosen for further assessment.
  • Since AF patients differ from the DVT treatment patient population (i.e., AF patients tend to be older and have decreased renal function), simulations using the population model developed for DVT treatment were conducted to predict the pharmacokinetics (PK) in patient with AF.4,5
    • Simulations showed that the plasma concentration-time profile for patients in the anticipated AF patient population with normal renal function who receive 20 mg once daily was similar to the estimated plasma concentration-time profile for patients in the DVT treatment population who receive the same dose.5
  • Dose selection for ROCKET AF was also supported by a phase 1 study demonstrating inhibition of XARELTO pharmacodynamic effects at 24 hours after dosing (i.e., inhibition of factor Xa activity).6
  • Additional citations identified during a literature search are included in the References section for your review.7-11

CLINICAL STUDIES

Phase 2, Dose-Ranging Studies

ROCKET AF trial

The ROCKET AF trial was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, event-driven, non-inferiority study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral, fixed-dose XARELTO 20 mg once daily (15 mg for patients with creatinine clearance [CrCl] of 30–49 mL/min) and dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio [INR]: 2.0 to 3.0) for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF at moderate-to-high risk for stroke.12

The selection of the 20 mg once-daily dose for XARELTO in the ROCKET AF study was based primarily on the results of 2 phase 2, dose-ranging studies evaluating XARELTO for the treatment of acute, symptomatic DVT, which are summarized below.1-3

  • These studies showed that the efficacy results with XARELTO once-daily or twice-daily were comparable to or better than the comparator for DVT treatment. The risk of bleeding was also similar, with no clear difference between once-daily or twice-daily dosing.
  • As a result of this data, the lowest dose of 20 mg once daily was chosen for further assessment. Additionally, based on a PK modeling study, 15 mg once daily was chosen to be used in patients with moderate renal impairment (CrCl of 30–49 mL/min).

Phase 2, dose-finding studies for DVT treatment were considered as the dose-finding studies for the phase 3 ROCKET AF study (for prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF) because the number of strokes in patients with AF would be too low in any phase 2 study to adequately select a dose for subsequent phase 3 studies.4,5

  • A model of DVT treatment was applied to studies of stroke prevention in patients with AF. This model measured thrombus regression after acute, proximal DVT.

ODIXa-DVT Study

The ODIXa-DVT study1 was a phase 2, dose-finding study to compare safety and efficacy between XARELTO and standard anticoagulation for treatment of acute, proximal DVT. Treatment groups included oral XARELTO (10 mg, 20 mg, or 30 mg twice daily or 40 mg once daily for 12 weeks) and subcutaneous (SC) enoxaparin 1 mg/kg twice daily (for at least 5 days) followed by vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for 12 weeks, dosed to an INR of 2.0 to 3.0. Complete compression ultrasound (CCUS) was performed at baseline to detect proximal DVT. Baseline perfusion lung scan was performed within 72 hours of CCUS and within 36 hours of initiation of study drug. CCUS and perfusion lung scans were performed at day 21 and again at day 84±14. Efficacy and safety results are presented in the tables below.

  • The primary efficacy endpoint was improvement in thrombotic burden (defined as ≥4-point reduction in the thrombus score, as measured by CCUS at day 21) in the absence of confirmed, symptomatic extension or recurrence of DVT, confirmed, symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), or venous thromboembolism-related death. Please see the table below for study results.
  • The primary safety outcome was the incidence of major bleeding, with onset no later than 2 days after the last dose of study drug. Please see the table below for results.

Incidence of Primary Efficacy Endpoint (Thrombus Regression at Day 21 [Days 18–26]) Without Recurrent, Symptomatic VTE or VTE-Related Death: Per-Protocol Population (n=528)1
 
XARELTO BID
XARELTO QD
Enoxaparin/VKA
10 mg
(n=100)
20 mg
(n=98)
30 mg
(n=109)
40 mg
(n=112)
(n=109)
Improved, n (%)
53 (53.0)
58 (59.2)
62 (56.9)
49 (43.8)
50 (45.9)
95% CI
42.8–63.1
48.8–69.0
47.0–66.3
34.4–53.4
36.3–55.7
Abbreviations: BID, twice daily; CI, confidence interval; QD, once daily; VKA, vitamin K antagonist; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Incidence of Bleeding Events Occurring ≤2 Days After Last Dose of Study Drug: Safety Population (n=604)1
 
XARELTO BID
XARELTO QD
Enoxaparin/VKA
10 mg
(n=119)
20 mg
(n=117)
30 mg
(n=121)
40 mg
(n=119)
(n=126)
Any bleeding, n (%)
6 (5.0)
11 (9.4)
13 (10.7)
14 (11.6)
8 (6.3)
Major bleedinga, n (%)
[95% CI]

2 (1.7) [0.2–5.9]
2 (1.7)
[0.2–6.0]
4 (3.3)
[0.9–8.3]
2 (1.7)
[0.2–5.8]
0 (0)
[0.0–2.9]
Minor bleeding, n (%)
4 (3.4)
9 (7.7)
11 (9.1)
12 (9.9)
8 (6.3)
Abbreviations: BID, twice daily; CI, confidence interval; QD, once daily; VKA, vitamin K antagonist.
aPrimary safety outcome.

XARELTO was determined to be safe and effective across all dosing groups (ranging from a total daily dose of 20 mg to 60 mg) in treating patients with acute, symptomatic, proximal DVT.

The EINSTEIN-DVT Dose-Ranging Study

The EINSTEIN-DVT Dose-Ranging Study2 was a phase 2, dose-ranging study that compared double-blinded, oral XARELTO 20, 30, or 40 mg once daily vs open-label, parenteral unfractionated heparin (started with 5000-IU bolus and 1250-IU/hour infusion) or low molecular weight heparin (SC tinzaparin 175 IU/kg once daily or SC enoxaparin 1.5 mg/kg once daily or SC enoxaparin 1 mg/kg twice daily) followed by an oral VKA (adjusted to target INR of 2.0 to 3.0) for treatment of acute, symptomatic DVT. Treatment was continued for 12 weeks. Compression ultrasound and perfusion lung scans were obtained at baseline and on day 84 (12 weeks). Efficacy and safety results are presented in the tables below.

  • The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of symptomatic recurrent DVT, symptomatic fatal or nonfatal PE, and asymptomatic deterioration in the burden of thrombosis at day 84 (12 weeks). Please see the table below for results.
  • The principal safety endpoint was the composite of major and clinically relevant, nonmajor bleeding up to 48 hours after treatment cessation. Secondary safety endpoints were any bleeding, all-cause mortality, and the individual components of the principal safety endpoint. Please see the table below for results.

Efficacy Outcomes: Per-Protocol Population (n=449)2
 
XARELTO QD
LMWH/VKA
(n=101)
20 mg
(n=115)
30 mg
(n=112)
40 mg
(n=121)
Primary efficacy outcome, n (%)
[95% CI]a
7 (6.1)
[2.5-12.1]
6 (5.4)
[2.0-11.3]
8 (6.6)
[2.9-12.6]
10 (9.9)
[4.9-17.5]
Symptomatic events, n (%)
3 (2.6)
4 (3.6)
2 (1.7)
7 (6.9)
 
Death (VTE-related)
0 (0.0)
2 (1.8)
1 (0.8)
0 (0.0)
 
PE, nonfatal
1 (0.9)
1 (0.9)
0 (0.0)
1 (1.0)
 
Recurrent DVT
2 (1.7)
1 (0.9)
1 (0.8)
7 (6.9)b
Asymptomatic deterioration on ultrasound and/or perfusion lung scanning, n (%)
4 (3.5)
2 (1.8)
6 (5.0)
3 (3.0)
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; LMWH, low molecular weight heparin; PE, pulmonary embolism; QD, once daily; VKA, vitamin K antagonist; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
aTwo-sided 95% CI are presented.
bOne patient presented with both DVT and PE.


Safety Endpoints: Safety Population (n=542)2
 
XARELTO QD
LMWH/VKA(n=137)
20 mg
(n=135)
30 mg
(n=134)
40 mg
(n=136)
Principal safety endpoint, n (%)[95% CI]
8 (5.9)
[2.6-11.3]

8 (6.0)
[2.6-11.4]
3 (2.2)
[0.5-6.3]
12 (8.8)
[4.6-14.8]
 
Major bleeding
1 (0.7)
2 (1.5)
0 (0.0)
2 (1.5)
 
Clinically relevant, nonmajor bleeding
7 (5.2)
6 (4.5)
3 (2.2)
10 (7.3)
Any bleeding, n (%)
31 (23.0)
29 (21.6)
29 (21.3)
38 (27.7)
Death (any cause), n (%)
4 (3.0)
8 (6.0)
2 (1.5)
5 (3.6)
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; LMWH, low molecular weight heparin; QD, once daily; VKA, vitamin K antagonist.

XARELTO was determined to be safe and effective in the 20-mg, 30-mg, and 40-mg fixed-dose treatment groups of patients with acute, symptomatic DVT, and a dose-dependent response was not apparent. The XARELTO 40-mg dose did not increase the risk for major bleeding or clinically relevant, nonmajor bleeding.

PHARMACOKINETIC MODELING

The patient population enrolled in the ROCKET AF study for stroke prevention in nonvalvular AF is recognized to be different than the population enrolled in the phase 2, dose-finding studies for DVT treatment. Patients with AF tend to be older and tend to have decreased renal function compared to those in the DVT treatment population. Therefore, a population PK model established from the phase 2, dose-finding studies for DVT treatment was used to simulate an AF population by modifying patient demographics to reflect those that would be expected for AF patients.4,5

  • Simulations showed that the plasma concentration-time profile for patients in the anticipated AF population with normal renal function who receive 20 mg once daily was similar to the estimated plasma concentration-time profile for patients in the DVT treatment population who receive the same dose.
  • PK simulations also demonstrated that lowering the dose of XARELTO to 15 mg once daily in patients with moderate renal impairment (CrCl ≤50 mL/min) would result in exposures similar to those seen in AF patients with normal renal function or mild renal impairment receiving 20 mg once daily.5

PHARMACODYNAMICS

Dose selection for ROCKET AF was also supported by a phase 1, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study that evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single doses of XARELTO (1.25, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 60, or 80 mg) in 108 healthy, white, male subjects.6 In this study, factor Xa activities had not completely returned to baseline at 24 hours for doses above 5 mg.

LITERATURE SEARCH

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) pertaining to this topic was conducted on 04 September 2024.

References

1 Agnelli G, Gallus A, Goldhaber SZ, et al. Treatment of proximal deep-vein thrombosis with the oral direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939): the ODIXa-DVT (Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor BAY 59-7939 in Patients With Acute Symptomatic Deep-Vein Thrombosis) study. Circulation. 2007;116(2):180-187.  
2 Buller HR, Lensing AW, Prins MH, et al. A dose-ranging study evaluating once-daily oral administration of the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban in the treatment of patients with acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: the Einstein-DVT Dose-Ranging Study. Blood. 2008;112(6):2242-2247.  
3 Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Supplement to: Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):883-891.  
4 Kubitza D, Berkowitz SD, Misselwitz F. Evidence-based development and rationale for once-daily rivaroxaban dosing regimens across multiple indications. Clin Appl ThrombHemost. 2016;22(5):412-422.  
5 Mueck W, Lensing AW, Agnelli G, et al. Rivaroxaban: population pharmacokinetic analyses in patients treated for acute deep-vein thrombosis and exposure simulations in patients with atrial fibrillation treated for stroke prevention. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011;50(10):675-686.  
6 Kubitza D, Becka M, Voith B, et al. Safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of single dose of rivaroxaban, An oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. Clin Pharmcol Ther. 2005;78(4):412-421.  
7 Girgis IG, Patel MR, Peters GR, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation: Results from ROCKET AF. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54(8):917-927.  
8 Trujillo T, Dobesh PP. Clinical use of rivaroxaban: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic rationale for dosing regimens in different indications. Drugs. 2014;74(14):1587-1603.  
9 Clemens A, Noack H, Brueckmann M, et al. Twice-or once-daily dosing of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention: a fixed-effects meta-analysis with predefined heterogeneity quality criteria. Plos One. 2014;9(6):e99276.  
10 Kreutz R. A clinical and pharmacologic assessment of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing for rivaroxaban. J Thromb Thrombolys. 2014;38(2):137-149.  
11 Brunner‐Ziegler S, Jilma B, Schörgenhofer C, et al. Comparison between the impact of morning and evening doses of rivaroxaban on the circadian endogenous coagulation rhythm in healthy subjects. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14(2):316-323.  
12 Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):883-891.